Legal Analysis Assignment : R V Levy

My spring internship with Charles L. Levy Law Firm introduced me to the complexities of children protective services (CPS) cases and contractual law. While working with Mr. Levy on CPS cases, I was able to observe over 30 civil cases at the Waco courthouse and help supervise child visits. I developed a more complete understanding of the importance of CPS cases through attending meetings with caseworkers, investigating suspect parents, and visiting children that had been placed in new homes. Mr. Levy also gave me the opportunity to collaborate on various insurance cases that exposed me to legal materials, such as depositions, that are common in many legal practices. Although tedious at times, helping Mr. Levy with insurance cases was interesting

Today I was able to have a quick interview with the honorable Mrs.Salvarez. I asked her a few questions about what she does in the government and if she could clarify some things.

They grabbed him off the stool, backward, out the doorway of the bamboo house, across a muddy yard to an even smaller outbuilding...Two more guards burst into the crowded little room and unleashed a cascade of kicks and clubbing, striking Gruters about the chest, belly, and arms.4

He stated , “I went up to Inmate Carter and request that he take a shower because he smelt bad.” After asking Inmate Carter to shower, Inmate Meyers stated, “Carter became angry and began yelling obscenities and inappropriate comments towards me, disrespecting me.” I then asked him what happened after Inmate Carter disrespected him. Inmate Meyers replied, “The only way to defend my honor was to fight him; so I hit him in the face which began the fight.”

In this brief, I am going to prove to you, the judges and the court, that Officer Raymond’s initial stop is objectively justified under the Fourth Amendment and the New Setonia Statute. Because the truck was old, Officer Raymond’s experience being a police officer, and Mr. Jackson’s making movements towards the glovebox while Officer Billy was approaching the car, this proved there was reasonable suspicion to stop the car. Additionally, even if Mr. Jackson’s car was not a commercial vehicle, there were enough other factors pertaining to search of the truck that made the mistake of law objectively reasonable. Based on all of the facts and the evidence listed in the case, the state of New Setonia is going to win.

At last the woman punched him straight in the jaw and he flew in the air five feet and landed hard, I heard a CRACK as his spine broke when he hit the floor.

and claimant’s boyfriend) arguing and inside her car. The security guard instructed the boyfriend to give

On June 21, 2016, members of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Sixth District were dispatched to a call for service for an “Assault in Progress”. Officers were met by the complainant who reported that the defendant invited her over to his residence and when she arrived the defendant already had another female companion at his home. The defendant began to insult the complainant at which point she tried to leave his home. The defendant grabbed the complainant by her hair and punched her in the face and body. The complainant refused medical treatment.

The parties involved; Mrs. Bieber (appellant’s mother), Mr. Gary Lee Cassidy (the appellant), and the two officers.

On January 13, 2015, the applicant was placed on probation for offences of injuring animals and trespass. These offences were committed on November 9, 2014, when the applicant was 12 years old. In this instance, the applicant caught and beat two sheep, later letting them be mauled by a dog. While there was no conviction recorded for these offences, the applicant was sentenced to three months probation.

The federal statute that has an extensive impact on state facilities and programs is Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871. These 1983 law suits can have an enormous impact on the day to day operation of the state and local prisons and jails. These 1983 suits are civil actions and not criminal actions. This means the prisoners can file a civil law suit in a federal court and challenge the conditions in the state and local prisons. These law suits that were filed by inmates claim that the prison official deprived the inmates of their constitutional rights. The inmates argue that they were deprived of adequate medical care, protection against excessive force by other inmates and the correctional officers and the inmates wanted access to

The report states that police were dispatched to a domestic violence assault in-progress. Upon arrival, a witness to the incident reported that she observed Mr. Nededog over the top of the victim as she was crouched in the back seat of a vehicle. The witness then saw the victim beating on the window of the car, indicating that she needed help. The witness opened the door to the vehicle and the victim left the car, “crying and very upset.” Mr. Nededog told the witness “you don’t have to call the cops, she’s leaving.” The victim was reluctant to tell the officers what had transpired. Mr. Nededog admitted to pushing the victim but not punching her. He told the officers he had been arrested for DV Assault in the past. Mr. Nededog was booked

After hearings on June 23rd and August 12th of 2015, Judge Richard Berman ruled to vacate Tom Brady’s four-game suspension on the morning of September 3rd . In his court document, Berman makes the following statement: For the reasons stated herein, the Management Council’s motion to confirm the arbitration award [ECF No. 4] is denied and the Player’s Association’s motion to vacate the arbitration award [ECF No. 28] is granted. Brady’s four-game suspension is vacated, effective immediately. The Clerk is respectfully requested to close cases 15 Civ. 5916 and 15 Civ. 5982. On October 27th, the NFL filed a 61-page brief in court that appealed Judge Berman’s decision in the Deflategate case. The NFL stated the Commissioner concluded that: “(1) Mr.

“Manslaughter - Recklessness or gross negligence - Assumption of duty of care for infirm person - Breach of duty amounting to recklessness - Negligence - Assumption of duty to care.”

1. Do you think that Levi’s was correct to keep the Levi Strauss name on its Signature line? Or would it have been better off creating a completely new brand name? Present both sides of the case. Take and justify a position.