Legal Analysis Of Lee P. Cao And Louann P

Complainant, a husband and a father of two minor children, 10 years old girl and 4 years old boy, alleges that Respondents refused to rent an available apartment to him based on his parental status.

Today I was able to have a quick interview with the honorable Mrs.Salvarez. I asked her a few questions about what she does in the government and if she could clarify some things.

When considering the facts of the Margolin’s lawsuit with the rules of jurisdiction, first one must understand when personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction would be applicable. As stated in the textbook, “Personal Jurisdiction is a court 's power to render a decision affecting the rights of the specific persons before the court. Generally, a court 's power to exercise in personam jurisdiction extends only over a specific geographic region.” (Kubasek, pg.42, 2009). Before a court can decide to implement control over a person, they require a minimum contact within the district in which the court is over. In this case, the minimum contact was established over the internet when Margolin inputted information over the internet that completed the business transaction. Since the contact is through the internet, and not within boundaries of the state of California or Florida, the court can exercise personal jurisdiction Margolin’s lawsuit over Funny Face and Novelty Now (Kubasek, 2009).

On June 19, 1982, Vincent Chin was murdered after his bachelor party in a hate crime driven by an outrage towards the Japanese auto industry misplaced onto himself (Embracing). Neither of his murderers ever spent a day in prison, despite appeals made in court (Embracing). Vincent Chin and his case still matters to Americans and should be made aware to the Wayne State faculty and students by the Filipino Student Society (FilSoc). Not necessarily every single person needs to be told directly by the FilSoc, but at least a small portion of the faculty and student body should become aware of the Vincent Chin case through FilSoc’s efforts.

David is a 17 year old Chinese-American and the only son of Cheng and Li-Hua Wang. He is currently in his sophomore year at a public high school and currently has a 3.98 GPA. In addition to his high academic standings David has a starting position on the junior varsity basketball team and is expected to move up to the varsity level before the end of the season. Aside from one minor traffic citation, David has no criminal record or disciplinary problems in or out of school. His parents, Cheng and Li-Hua, both emigrated from Taiwan and became naturalized citizens shortly before the birth of David. Neither Cheng nor Li-Hua has a college degree but both have been successful in working in the service industry. Cheng currently is a manager of a small Asian market located in their neighborhood and Li-Hua is a teacher’s aide for a small preschool.

The Defendants, Reverend Linwood Rooks, Reverend Harriet Yun, and Bald Mountain Community Church (BMCC), move to strike the Exhibit C to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Yun to Answer Deposition Questions. Reverend Yun places high importance on the confidentiality of her conversations with her congregants. All of her conversations with Esther Borzoi have been kept confidential until Ms. Borzoi decided to waive her privilege for one of their most recent conversations. Since Reverend Yun believes that it is important for her to maintain the confidences of those in her congregation, she has refused to waive privilege and has asserted her right of privilege under Alabama Rules of Evidence Rule 505. Reverend Yun has proven that she meets

To summarize the case of Kim v. Son, Jinsoo Kim invested in two of Stephen Son’s corporations, which eventually failed, and Kim lost his money. Son felt bad, he and Kim got together and became very intoxicated and signed a “contract” in blood, stating that Son promised to pay Kim the money he lost and Kim agreed not to sue him. As it turned out, when Son sobered up he refused to keep his promise to pay Kim, so Kim filed a lawsuit based on this bloody contract. The judge declared the contract void due to lack of consideration (Beatty, Samuelson, Bredeson, 2013).

Intentional misrepresentation of a pre-existing material fact by the defendant or the omission or concealment of a material fact if there is a duty to disclose; 2. reliance on the misrepresentation or concealment which induces the plaintiff to act, and 3. injury to the plaintiff resulting from the misrepresentation or concealment.(Exhibit “B”)” Generally, when a buyer is injured by a fraudulent misrepresentation by the seller, the liability may be based on the infringement of the fraud. It can be seen in this case that John constitutes a fraudulent act. Initially, before he began advertising his home for sale, he asked the librarian if the local paper would be destroyed.

Another asset in New Jersey has had numerous problems during the eviction. It had a lockout set in November 2015, when it was discovered it was multi-unit. It is unclear why this was not known earlier and while Altisource indicated this was not identified as 3 units originally, RMS indicated this was identified in October 2015. Many of the required notices prepared by counsel have been faulty and needed to be re-issued. It is not clear if Altisource or counsel is responsible for all the issues, but this has been an asset RMS follows up on every 2 or 3 weeks since it has been in eviction. The latest update was judgment was denied on one unit as the complaint was against unknown occupants and a PI needed to be hired. On another unit, the eviction is in the

While the Chinese system may incorporate some of the Western legal tradition, it does not solely influence the Chinese law. The western counterparts are tweaked into the Chinese legal system to create its own tradition – the Chinese legal system. China has a socialist market economy which co–exists with a larger part of the public sector in the economy. Moreover, the state, unlike other Western countries and legal traditions, is seen as both the policymaker and the regulator to an extent which may go beyond the law, putting into the question the sense of separation of powers. All this may distinguish the Chinese legal tradition from its Western counterparts. In this essay, the main distinctive features of the Chinese legal tradition shall be emphasized and discussed.

It is within the agent’s apparent authority to sell a property on behalf of the principal to make descriptions of the property to the buyer. However, if the representations made are false, the principal will be liable for the acts of that agent where the leading case is Aliotta v Broadmeadows Bus Service Ltd (1988) A.T.P.R. 40 – 873 which the court held that the agents has mislead the plaintiff by not revealing all the material information to the plaintiff.

We can find it in the old books, and can easy find it from the literal

The given case study revolves around the problems of the Lee and Li`s firm which appeared because of the rude interference in its traditional functioning of one of its workers. Being founded in 1953 in Taiwan as the law office, the firm managed to guarantee its blistering evolution and development. On the wave of success, in 1965 the firm was joined by C.N. Li and the new company continued its blistering rise. The founders of the company died and now it is headed by Paul Hsu, Kwan-Tao Li (C.N. Li’s son) and C.V. Chen. They managed to guarantee the extreme growth of the firm and made it one of the most significant companies in the given sector. The company was oriented on clear and open interaction with its clients, resulting in the high level of popularity and incomes. caring for people, excellence in quality and client service were taken as the main principles in accordance with which the functioning of the company was organized. Now, the company works with SanDisk Corporation which is one of it greatest clients. The fact

When we got to the house Staci was selling and hosting an open house at, we set up the wine and cheese bar to make people feel more comfortable and welcome, and waited for people to start coming. I like to think of the open house as one big sales call that lasted for a few hours. In this big sales call there were multiple smaller, but equally as important, sales calls. The prospects were pre-prioritized due to the fact that Staci had promoted the open house, and the only people who would come are people who are interested in the product she’s selling. The house is $750,000 house located in Southlake, Texas.

Such cases of fraud with the property buyers and breach of laws come popping up in our country every now and then. And in this trap, the burden of loss is heaviest on the buyers’ shoulders. Laws have been made but what requires more concern is the strict implementation of these rules and regulation. So it is your responsibility to know your rights and responsibilities.