Legal Case Brief : Federal Communication Commission ( Fcc ) V. Fox Television Stations 567 U.s. Essay

The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, and the decision is described as follows:

Directions: write a 3-5 sentence summary for each court case. The court cases are Marbury vs Madison, Mcculloch vs Maryland, and the court case is Gibbons vs Ogden. This is due on Monday, January 09, 2017

Identification of Parties and Procedural Details: Who is the Plaintiff/Appellant? Who is the Defendant/Appealer? What is the cause of action? Who prevailed in lower court? Who is appealing to what court?

In the 1969 case of Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the fairness doctrine that the Federal Communication Commission imposed on them in relation to a specific broadcast. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. aired that program on November 27, 1964, which included a personal attack on one author Fred J. Cook. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. refused to give Fred J. Cook his requested free time on air for rebuttal. As a result, the FCC supported Cook and ordered the radio station to give Cook his time on air for the opportunity to refute the previous negative claims made against him. The D.C. Circuit of the Court of Appeals subsequently upheld the FCC’s decision. Another appeal made and this time it was put in the hands of the

Whether the circuit court erred in considering parol evidence to determine whether the B108 document was a contract.

Key Use: This article provides some basic facts of the case. The article would be helpful because it gives basic facts of the case, what the court’s decision was, and what the court was trying to answer in the case. This article would be helpful by providing quotes or information from the majority opinion on the case.

: In 1992, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act required cable companies to give a certain number of their channels to local broadcast programs. The Cable Act included several “must-carry” rules that limited the control of open channels by cable programmers and increased competition for the left over channels. Soon after the Act became law, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., the owner of several cable programming operations, brought this case against the FCC and challenged if the must-carry regulations were constitutional. A special three-judge U.S. District Court ruled in favor of Turner Broadcasting, granting the summary judgment that the requirements were consistent with the First Amendment and intermediate scrutiny

Meehan v. American Media International, LLC, 214 N.C.App 245, 260, 712 S.E.2d 904, 913 (N.C.App. 2011) (citations omitted).

At the end of the decade the FCC investigated a television scandal involving quiz show revealing how the shows were fixing the results of some shows and the hearings led to regulations that prevented fixing of television shows. As the country entered the 1960’s and 1970’s, the FCC entered into new decades with more advances in technology in the communication industry and had to decide whether to regulate the new technology, satellite and cable

3. Summarize the legal arguments raised by the (a) plaintiff and by the (b) defendant.

This lead to the passing of the 1912 radio act which required broadcasters to have a license. Where it was easy enough to get a license and without any restrictions on who was able to have a license, this led to the separation of classes in the licenses where a class B license would allow for larger stations to operate on less congested frequencies and reach more listeners. Class A license holders were on a more congested frequency where there was much overlap between broadcasters. After in-fighting between the growing partners of RCA and the acquisition of AT&T’s WEAF, this led to the formation of NBC. Under the NBC umbrella, there was a monopoly growing and fearing that NBC had too much power the Federal Radio Commission was formed. The Federal Radio Commission would go on to restructure the distribution of radio licenses and categorize radio stations based on signal strength and programming content. (Hilmes pg 14, 15)

Content regulation is what people most associate the Federal Communications Commission with and more specifically the rules on indecency, profanity, and obscenity. The radio station cutting out the curse words follows the rules from profanity. The Federal

Judicial Review Proceedings Introduction = == == == ==

We live in an ever-changing world where media is growing day by day. Rules must change to agree with the ever-changing media and the effects of it. With all this comes the question of how far and how much should media be regulated without neglecting them of their rights. Some would say that the government has put too much regulation on the media while others may think that media needs more regulation. We must also acknowledge the Citizens freedom of expression and what the people can do with those rights. In this paper, I will talk about Our Right to express, media Regulation in America, Court cases that helped us define the rules, and the yes and no’s.

The Appellant’s Statement of the Case and Statement of Facts are consistent with the evidence on the record, and therefore, not argumentative, speculative and do not contain irrelevant facts, but those contained on the record.