Legal Considerations And Legal Law Essay

1) Since the injured plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt, why is Ford being sued for failing to test the seatbelt sleeve?

As Privy Council held in the case of "Wagon Mound (No 1)" that a party can only be held liable for damage that was reasonably foreseeable, the defendant should not be responsible for losses that are ‘too remote’ from the breach. It is obviously that the university could foresee that Brad have to quit his job to finish the degree and also need to pay for the fees.

1. Give an example of a case that would fall under diversity jurisdiction. Explain all of the key elements of such a case.

In the case of Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a law may not punish a status; i.e., one may not be punished to being an alcoholic or for being addicted to drugs. However, of course, one may be punished for actions such as abusing drugs. The question becomes; What if the status “forces” the action? What if a person, because of his/her addiction to drugs, is “forced” by the addiction to purchase and abuse the illegal drugs? Would punishing that person be unfairly punishing a status?

case brief---Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy hour and Wessel will pay $250 to Gregory. All performers could make $500 per appearance on the comedy hour. and when Wessel was scheduled to aper on the comedy hour, Gregory informed him that he was unable to provide the monologue, because last time Wessel was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs performance during the comedy hour. and Wessel bought lawsuit to Gregory for beach of contract and request damages of $1250.

3. For a crime to be committed, the prosecutor must be able to prove a criminal intent and an overt act to carry out that intent. Jack and Mary agreed to rob a series of banks. Prior to beginning their bank robbery spree, they were arrested and charged with criminal conspiracy. What act did Jack and Mary do that justifies a finding that they committed the crime? Explain.

Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Analysis Intro It has become a growing epidemic for company’s to regulate their ethical and legal standings. From the employee’s working within the company, to those consumers taking in the products and services that the company is shelling out, these specifics are things that just about everyone would like to know. Within each company whether they conduct their business exclusively online, if they are strictly brick and mortar, or even if they dabble a little bit into both to conduct their consumer base, they all have standards that need to be regulated, of which the most talked about are the ethical and legal standings of a company. Discussed below are the

A look at the concepts and science behind the substantive law as a significant practical factor in the operationalization of courts requires a shift of accent from the mere study of the legal doctrine to the study of an operation of an institution. Substantive law and procedural law work in tandem with each other to ensure that in all civil and criminal cases instated in courts, appropriate rules are

Formalists were legal theorists of the late 19th century. Formalism was regarded as a way of a mechanical interpretation of the law. Using syllogism, a logical process, judges selected an appropriate legal rule. This was applied rationally to the facts of the case and from this a conclusion was objectively deduced. This was regarded as a scientific process removing subjectivity where the correct decisions were inherent

There are a lot of different aspects of law. Although Mrs. Holt’s second period has only covered unit one of many, one can still see how complicated law is. From basic human rights, to lawmaking, to advocacy, from settling disputes and the court system, to lawyers themselves, just the tip of the Law-iceberg is enough to make someone want to freak out.

Here Dworkin takes the view that most judges are likely not highly idiosyncratic as they “will be like other people in their community” . Yet for the majority of citizens, they desire to take a deeper understanding into law to only avoid or get away with legal sanctions. A consensus of views, even a rough one, on what the law requires or how judges should interpret the rules is critical to the process for them attempting to predict the legal consequences of their deeds. This also assists in the law succeeding in coordinating the society’s behaviors, yet such a like-mindedness in interpretation is not easy to come by unless one knows what makes the texts of the legal rules better or

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Case No. 2, 1999, posted at www.itlos.org.

The law is a delicate yet malleable set of rules and principles that are formed to suite the needs of those deciding its purpose. The role of law for business and society is to provide set rules and procedures that fall within general functions which reflect the position of the people. In various types of governments the law is adjusted to suite the needs of the dictator, its citizens or its elected body as seen fit. In a republic, such as the United States of America, the laws are formed by elected leaders to suite the needs and concerns of the citizens (Republic, 2005). These laws are adjusted, changed and updated as needed in order to match the position of the voting majority.

The common law system of justice delivery has been adopted by India which owes its origins to British jurisprudence, the basis of which is the rule of law. According to Dicey, the Englishman does not need any form of written or administrative law to keep cheeks on the government but that the natural law and Rule of Law would be enough to ensure absence of excutive arbitrariness. While India also follows and accepts the concept of natural law, there are written and formal laws to ensure compliance.

The common law system of justice delivery has been adopted by India which owes its origins to British jurisprudence, the basis of which is the rule of law. According to Dicey, the Englishman does not need any form of written or administrative law to keep cheeks on the governmentbut that the natural law and Rule of Law would be enough to ensure absence of excutive arbitrariness. While India also follows and accepts the concept of natural law, there are written and formal laws to ensure compliance.