Legal Writing Interoffice Memorandum

Like the defendant in Moore, Herrera is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law in this action, because she could not have known or realized that the rock towers on her property would pose an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury to Maria. Herrera’s private property is located in a remote location in Arizona where she allows adults to view her land art by appointment only. It is reasonably understandable that Herrera does not like uninvited or unwanted individuals on her property at anytime. Moreover, since the land art was for adults only to view, she never allowed children on her property to view her land art. As a result, no injuries were ever reported from the adults who visited and viewed her land art.

To determine Burov’s liability, two elements require further analysis: did Burov know or has a reason to know that children are likely to trespass and did the children realize the risks associated with meddling with the hot tub. If either element is met Burov will not be liable for Frank’s

Whether Sherman, under the attractive nuisance doctrine, will likely prevail against Carlisle for multiple injuries he sustained in a fall from wooden steps of a tree house in disrepair while trespassing upon Carlisle’s property when: (1) Carlisle was aware that the neighborhood surrounding his property was populated with children; (2) a severe storm had damaged Carlisle’s property and exposed the previously concealed tree house; (3) Sherman was six years of age at the time of his injury; (4) Carlisle had little incentive to make repairs to the tree house prior to the storm because of its concealment; (5) immediately following the storm, Carlisle made arrangements with a contractor at a higher than average rate to make

FACTS: In 1982, defendant purchased thirty-nine acres of land, consisting of woods, swamp, and meadows, in an isolated part of Lincoln, Vermont. He put up several "no trespassing" signs where the road turned into his driveway and posted his land with signs that said, "POSTED Private Property.

Trespass to land is defined as direct and intentional interference with land that belongs to the plaintiff, without the express or implied licence of the plaintiff. The issue here is whether or not the police officers entered the land without the express or implied licence of the plaintiff.

Adverse Possession or Squatters Rights share the same definition. These terms bear a similar legal right to abandoned land or property. A process that can be dated back as far as 1068 during the ear of Henry I in England. Building personal wealth began with property ownership, which created social value for the community. Today, this process still exists; however, the right to ownership may take more than just staking a claim or improving an abandoned piece of land. To correct any confusion, each state derived laws that protect the adverse possessor as well as the property owner.

According to Utah law, can a property owner be held liable for injuries sustained by trespassers while on their property?

A total Institution involves using internal or external means to enforce social norms.There are four characteristics of a controlled environment that are exemplified throughout the film “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” Status hierarchy, depersonalization, adjustment, and institutionalization are the four characteristics of a controlled environment.

B. Because being struck by a cyclist is an inherent risk of rollerblading, Alice owed no duty of reasonable care toward Pete to take precautions to avoid that risk. However, Alice has violated her duty not to act willfully or recklessly. Therefore, Alice will be fully liable for the harm she caused.

In this paragraph we’re going to discuss some of the property laws and why I believe they were fair. Law 21, “If a man has broken through

Work Completed: I have completed six weeks of the class, and I am not happy with my current grade but I am working on it. That is due to an LP3 assignment I did not turn in

I am Officer Jose Luis Alamo from the VA Police. I when to visit the Springfield CBOC and it gets to my attention that a veteran patient Mr. Sean Pelzer was calling to your office making threats to you and other VA personnel. I would like to know if you can give me more information about MR Pelzer threats , for example: when was the last time he called you?( Date and Time ). Are MR Pelzer continue to called you recently? I will deeply appreciated if any future incident with Mr. Pelzer or any other Patient occurred feel free to contact the VA Police to report it.

I do not agree with the Judge’s ruling about the area was an open fields and no warrant was required. According to the definition of the “open-fields doctrine”, “it generally refers to an open field, and is any space where the owner has not taken steps to physically exclude trespassers to the point of reasonably expecting privacy” (James,2014). When pertaining to the Judge’s ruling in this case, it states, “ the property had a locked gate and “No Trespassing” signs that were prominently placed. But according to the article written by James, 2014, “Excluding for privacy requires more than posting a "No Trespassing" sign. So the “No Trespassing” signs had no merit when dealing with the “open-fields doctrine”. I believe what the Judge should have

Trespass to the Person is a civil wrong causing direct and intentional interference with a person’s bodily integrity, or causing unlawful restraint. In order for someone to be convicted to trespass to the person, the trespass needs to be proven, but damages do not necessarily have needed to occur. Trespass to the person can be broken down into three categories; battery, assault, and false imprisonment. (65)

The common definition for a memorandum is a written document recorded for future use, something one can use in the present to see the message behind past actions. This Memorandum on Colonizing New France speaks of the plans in which the French intended to pursue their new land. Although we are not given any specific author we are able to decipher that this writer was in close proximity to the colony of New France. This shows us major insight into the mindset these newcomers had and more importantly, shows us the way they viewed the inhabitants and their land. Thus making this a very useful source when deciding if the French truly had good intentions.