Essay on Legalizing Drugs or Joining the Drug Addict Circle?

Proponents on the legalization of drugs believe if drugs were to become legal; the black market worth billions of dollars would become extinct, drug gangsters would disappear, addicts would stop committing crimes to support their habit and the prison system would not be overwhelmed with a problem they cannot defeat. The decriminalization of drugs will only make illegal drugs cheaper, easier to get and more acceptable to use. “The U.S. has 20 million alcoholics and alcohol misusers, but only around 6 million illegal drug addicts. If illegal drugs were easier to obtain, this figure would rise”(Should Drugs be decriminalized? No.November 09, 2007 Califano Joseph A, Jr).”

My team and I evaluated a case where legalizing drugs would bring a greater happiness to society and that a small population of drug users would get addicted. We believe that legalizations on hard drugs would lead to bad behavior and a spike in addiction rates. Specifically, on drugs like Alcohol, Cocaine, or Heroin, etc. As what Jeremy Bentham would say, “It is the greatest good to the greatest number”. We want everyone to be happy by having a healthy society and peaceful world. My group follows Bentham’s utilitarianism theory which it benefits the society. Making drugs illegal would benefit society as hole. Legalizing drugs would terminate families, increase crime, and money, health would take a sudden decline.

There is a lot of misconception about drug legalization. Uncertainty towards this concept is usually because of stigma surrounding drug use or confusing legalization with decriminalization. Decriminalising an illegal drug means taking away penalties for possessing that drug but leaving its distribution in the hands of criminals who can continue to contaminate the drug any way they see fit. Legalization by contrast brings narcotics entirely under government control. That means that when a drug is legalized, the government is the one in charge of regulating the sales, content, and distribution of the drug.

Usually kids and teenagers don't research the product they get so they don't know if it's high-quality or not, they are just interested in actually getting the drugs, legalizing drugs would benefit kids and keep them safe from the laced drugs and drug dealers. One of the guys Hari interviewed told a story about a kid approaching him and asking him to buy a bottle of liquor. At first he didn't understand why but then thinking about it he soon realized, "i'm saying to myself this kid needs me to get him a bottle of liquor, when he can go to get any drug he wants in the parking lot without me what was better regulated the liquor, or the drugs in the parking lot?"(267). If drugs became legalized it would be harder for kids to receive drugs because they would be selling in stores versus people selling it in parking lots. Of course you will get some dealer still trying to sell on the side but who would want to buy drugs that they don't know if it is laced are not versus buying it at a store where it would be higher quality and safer for them to use. So by legalizing drugs it stops the gangs and the dealers on the side selling them to kids teenagers and other people. An article about legalizing drugs called creating a market states, "International drug traffickers are spending a Normas amount of money to make sure the drugs are available to every American kid any schoolyard"(5). Legalizing drugs

The argument over drug reform and the current prohibition has been going on for years. It seems to be an argument between a wise parent and a young teenager, but as generations change more and more of the parents seem to switch sides. While prohibitionists say the mainstream drugs like cocaine, heroin, LSD, and marijuana are harmful and immoral, legalizers argue the opposite (Rachels 223). While they are both valid and interesting arguments the drugs named above still remain illegal. Many organizations and respected citizens have come to America’s attention in their support for drug reform or complete legalization of certain drugs. These people range from normal citizens who support the recreational use of marijuana to judges and ex- law

There are many differing viewpoints in the United States when dealing with drug policy. Within the political arena, drug policy is a platform that many politicians base their entire campaigns upon, thus showing its importance to our society in general. Some of these modes within which drug policy is studied are in terms of harm reduction, and supply reduction. When studying the harmful effects of drugs, we must first to attempt to determine if drug abuse harms on an individual level of if it is a major cause of many societal problems that we face today. In drawing a preliminary conclusion to this question we are then able to outline the avenues of approach in dealing

We should decriminalize drugs in the U.S. instead of legalizing them. Decriminalization refers to the lessening of criminal penalties of certain acts. According to De Marneffe, “… the legalization of drugs … [is] the removal of criminal penalties for the manufacture, sale, and possession of large quantities of recretational drugs, such as marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine” (346).

The current policy in use by the United States concerning illegal drugs is both outdated and unfair. This so-called war on drugs is a deeply rooted campaign of prohibition and unfair sentencing that is very controversial and has been debated for many years. The war on drugs is designed so that it will never end. This current drug was has very little impact on the overall supply of prohibited drugs and its impact on demand seems non-existent. United States’ taxpayers are spending billions of dollars on this failure of policy. They are spending billions to incarcerate drug users instead offering drug treatment which could help lower demand. Legalizing illicit would lower abuse and deaths from use and could have a positive economic impact on the United States. Certain industries are making massive sums of money by capitalizing on the drug war.

One of the author’s reasons to support his view is that the majority of society already does not use drugs regularly, so legalization would not dramatically increase the number of drug-dependent users. Another main reason is that most harms caused by illegalization of drugs are not only in effect in the United States, but also in less developed countries. Concerning regulations, one of his reasons to legalize drugs is that legalization can open more opportunities to enhance

Herbert Kleber , feels as though if drugs were to become legalized it would cause more people to want to use it and that legalizing it wouldn’t do anything. Author Gorman, feels as though that restricting drug use has been ineffective and that since the laws have become more stringent more people use the illegal substances.

Treatment is only a part of the price that we pay, we will also be paying for

Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. This issue embraces two positions: drugs should not be legalized and drugs should be legalized. These two positions contain an array of angles that supports each issue. This brief of the issues enables one to consider the strengths and weakness of each argument, become aware of the grounds of disagreement and agreement and ultimately form an opinion based upon the positions stated within the articles. In the article “Against the Legalization of Drugs”, by James Q. Wilson, the current status of drugs is supported. Wilson believes if a drug such as heroin were legalized there would be no financial or medical reason to avoid heroin usage;

and users can even become aggressive and violent. In few cases results in death, from

“ We realize that drug addiction is a sickness, but it is also a crime” according to Pam Bondi. As we all know drug abuse is a big problem that is not often discussed. The reason we do not discuss it because we tend to hide things that cause a mad image or problem in our society. But the issue is much bigger. The legalization of drugs would improve many things such as how the government would have control over its cost and sales, the decrease of crime rates and the way we treat the people in our community who seek help.

Anti-Legalization side makes some reasonable points. Some like if the drug is legal then the more users will appear. Along with this point, they make another good point, as in overdose. Anti-Legalization side claims that more people will overdose due to more legal the drug. I oppose that it is like Alcohol in a way. If a person drinks too much Alcohol they can die, and in fact, do. If drugs become legalize you could regulate it and oversee it. The more supervision the better I think too because that will keep a good watch on how much someone can buy. With all another Philosopher, who is on the Anti-legalization side, James Wilson makes a big argument against legalization. He uses the British vs. America addict’s growth with the drug being legal vs. legal. America didn’t grow any within the same amount of spread as Britain, the stats, so this means