Legally Speaking Can Online Piracy Be Stopped By Laws

My reality was shattered as all my aspirations of making my life easier with the internet suddenly tumbled down into my stomach as it sank. I went back to working on my group project about an imaginary amendment being added to the constitution to strip the electoral college of its power. We were using google drive to streamline the work and I sank even lower to the ground. Google drive could be gone if a fat cat CEO decided something was wrong with google drive. This caused me to despise censorship. At this very moment I defined the scourge of humanity known as censorship as the denial of any piece of information or content to any person or persons who seek to find them. I was envigorated by this gut punch and starting to tell my family, friends, and teachers. I became so furious, but I also found out the rest of the internet was too. Huge companies such as Google, Wikipedia, and Mozilla were furious at the notion of limiting people's free speech and access to the internet. They organized an internet blackout out day where thousands of websites blacked out access to protest SOPA. This caused so much pressure and backlash on congress that they were forced to stop the bill. All my worries were washed away following this

If there is anything we know for sure, it is that the internet will never be the perfect virtual paradise we want it to be. Those who advocate regulating speech on the internet are trying to create an online utopia: a place where all expression is positive and building. But we are humans, and when we desire to

When discussing internet censorship, one of the major concerns is what children can see on the internet. Internet censorship was a huge deal during the 1990’s and early 2000’s and it still is to this very day. The internet back then was much different than it is today. Back then, we could only access the internet from a computer and most people didn’t own one back then. Nowadays, most people have multiple computers and a cell phone that can access the internet. It was easier for parents to control what their children could have access to back then. Now, parents can still put restrictions on the router settings and set a timer for when the internet shuts off but kids can always just go somewhere else that may have internet access to view any

The issue of censorship is not just an issue from the old times however. This controversial epidemic has been increasing in importance and mass, looming over the freedom of information as a cloud of darkness and uncertainty may in recent years.

In a world of ever evolving technology, it has become increasingly difficult for many leaders to censor and control the flow of information. The development of the Internet throughout the nineties has created a cosmopolitan world in which people from across the earth can communicate and share ideas and information. The development of Internet technology and social media web platforms have led to an increased desire for democracy in many areas of the world; however, some nations have worked to curtail the freedom of information flow by developing complex Internet censorship programs. While Internet censorship is a highly relevant topic in today’s society, it is mainly viewed as a problem in non-democratic countries. While at there is merit to this viewpoint, censorship is a much more universal obstacle than most people realize.

This paper addresses whether we should censor or block access to websites with controversial material. It looks at the issue from several sides: The relevant US laws that are in place, how censorship is used at the university and corporate levels, how other countries are attempting censorship, and finally what I feel about the topic.

ternet censorship is a great tool that groups can use to hide sensitive information, but can be easily abused. I learned that lots of companies are bullied into using Internet Censorship to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences. It has become such a normal idea of blocking any information that gets a minority group offended, that people don’t even think twice when they see it. Thankfully, total censorship of information is very difficult or impossible to achieve due to the underlying distributed technology of the Internet.

Digital piracy on music has been a majorly disputed affair for the last eighteen years, about whether or not it favors the musical artists or affects them in a negative fashion. One of the many sides of the Digital piracy controversy expounds that it benefits the artist(s) by giving them a great deal of exposure that they may not have received had they not downloaded it for free, which in turn makes for a very significant acquisition in terms of sales on their part.

In today’s society an innumerable amount of discussions, disputes, and altercations have begun based on the broad matter of censorship and its many components. Censorship is commonly described as the process of controlling the information and ideas that circulate throughout a society and its inhabitants. Much of the world’s censoring transpires through the world wide web, popularly known as the internet, and is generally inflicted by the government and other powerful corporations who “contend with the issue on numerous occasions” (“Topic Overview” 1). Due to the topic being so controversial, both proponents and opponents accompany the longstanding argument. Those in favor of censoring the usage of

Social media censorship has a big impact on American society where there's been a lot of control over what someone can post on the internet. The companies have created strict policies towards what people can post and a lot of the users are not happy.The big problem is that social media companies have too much power with censoring what people say and read, which is limiting people's freedom of speech and I don’t believe that companies should censor a lot of the things people post in social media unless is something bad that can harm someone. Companies find ways to censor people's media post either because they believe it can hurt a country's image or they believe others wouldn't like it.

In a country that has a long history of upholding the freedom of speech and advanced technologies, people in the United States have enjoyed the internet to the largest scale for many decades. The internet made it possible to spread information worldwide, and thus it would not be strange for most of the people to hear the phrase “Internet Censorship”. Many people are familiar with this phrase, and are aware that this kind of censorship is in almost every country. However, to what extent, and for what purpose, Internet censorship is used, is still a general obscurity with the public. In this paper, I would like to explore how this technology is used and its impact on the three strictest countries regarding freedom of Internet access to information:

Is not produced the same way as movies or video games: music comes from an artist, and you paying money for that music helps to support that artist. For every album you pirate you steal a dollar from the artist, which definitely hurts, but you're really hurting the business behind the artists more than the artists themselves. No one can deny that album sales are an important source of income for musicians; however, it's not nearly as big a money-maker as many people believe. In actuality bands make most of their money on tour or selling things like t-shirts and stickers. If you truly wanted to support that artist you should buy some merchandise or see them live; otherwise, you're just feeding money to iTunes and their record label. In an interview with the Times Online in the UK Lady Gaga explained how touring is more important than album sales. On the other hand, piracy and file sharing can also lead to popularity, if your music is good, people will pirate it, they'll listen to it, and they'll spread it, creating a fan

The simplest definition of censorship is the control or suppression of ideas and information released within a society. In the early 20th century, censorship was achieved for the purpose of altering offensive or objectionable information that may have brought negative attention to government or a political figure. However in recent times censorship has taken a more iron-fisted approached with suppressing information and it can be argued that nations across the world are stripping away our freedom of speech through the internet. This has become a pressing issue throughout different communities around the world and it has divided content creators and internet surfacers alike. Censorship has become such a talked about topic that news outlets such as The Washington Times and Huffington Post have taken a stance on the matter. Washington times took a biased stance posting an article titled “Blankly, we need censorship” while Huffington Post takes a more unbiased approach covering both sides of the argument. Finding multiple perspectives on the same issue is key when analyzing different news stories and it is important that one is able to see what information may be biased or not when taking it in.

Piracy is a big issue in the gaming industry and is happening all the time and companies are trying their best to get rid of this issue. The problem with trying to get rid of this issue is that there will always be people figuring out loopholes in the defense of piracy.

Internet censorship is developing far and wide and influences us, regardless that as United States citizens, we have additional technological opportunities than what many other nations do. Numerous Americans underestimate the opportunities that living in the United States permits us. Whether we are sending electronic mail, posting on our social media pages, or seeking out the latest news, we are ensured the opportunity of self-expression and an inexhaustible amount of information right at our fingertips. Censorship takes control of people's expression, and many countries, governments, and leaders support it for this reason. Internet Censorship in the United States in comparison to different nations brings to light the global and ethical issue regarding the basic human rights of education, communication, and freedom.