Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper And Jacopo Tintoretto's The Last Supper

The Purpose of the paintings of the “Last Supper,” by Ugolino di Nerio and Leonardo da Vinci, were to portray the betrayal of Jesus Christ by of one the twelve apostles, as they are having the last meal. Jesus Christ mentions to his apostles that there is going to be a betrayal amongst them. All twelve apostles had mixed feelings of anger, fear, and surprised. Later on, it turns out that Judas, one of the twelve apostles, had told the authorities about Jesus so he can be arrested then later crucified. The paintings show a dramatic scene after the claim by Jesus Christ. The paintings give us insight to get the reader interested in the painting of “The Last Supper,” how the cultures that produced those paintings change the way we paint today, and how both paintings influenced the Renaissance era.

Tintoretto’s portrayal of the Last Supper is one of dramatic Metaphysicalism. It features the dinning table diagonally along the left half of the work behind it Jesus and his Disciples before the table there is a woman cleaning and in the area above them are the angelic presence of cherubs. There are a number of smaller scenes present within the artwork and there are a number of focal points, which lead the viewer’s eyes over them. The work is full of emotion and is largely unbalanced this is reflective of the time in which the work was created when there was a lot of social outrage and anger. Tintoretto used fantasy, to the point of surrealism in this work; Cherubs and halos are used to emphasize the religious significance of the event. This work has the presence of women. There is a strong contrast in this work with very deep shadows and vibrant bright highlights due to the dramatic lighting. There is an extremely strong use of colour and chiaroscuro.

The Renaissance was a distinct time period from the middle ages, due to many factors. Some of the factors include, the artist's’ thinking, the style of art, and architecture, and the advancement of education.

Michelangelo “The Creation of Adam” can be compared and contrasted to Leonardo Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper”. The paintings are both similar and different. They are both high renaissance works by big time artists of the time period. Including, they are both religious and symbolize life. The last supper is a mural painted on a wall. Leonardo decided to use pigment on dry gesso technique and Michelangelo used. The fresco technique more aesthetically pleasing in the Sistine chapel were he painted “The Creation of Adam”. Plus Da Vinci’s painting consist of serval focal points. Michelangelo’s painting includes just one focal point which is the finger tips. Lastly, Da Vinci was painting history. He included a scene that was devoid of emotion and empathy.

The High Renaissance in Italy, although short lived, was extremely important on the influences of future Italian art. During the High Renaissance the main focus on Florence, for the arts, shifted to Rome due to the power and wealth from the popes. Because of the move from Florence to Rome, the two most important factors of this time, Classicism and Christianity, were merged into one. “Italian ideas were also brought northward through trade and commerce into Europe, where they had a tremendous amount of influence on the artistic traditions there as well” (Benton & DiYanni, 2008).

Most forms of Catholic Baroque art are assertive and, as intended, assault ones senses. The evolution of religious art from the uniform composition characteristic of the Italian Renaissance through the evolving Mannerism in to the bold and striking Baroque was striking to say the least. The stylistic changes from Da Vinci's The Last Supper to Tintoretto's version in the 1590's bear a perfect example of this transition. The point of view in Da Vinci's was central and allowed for a

Artists that concentrated on the Baroque style of painting had an uncanny ability to display their style more so than the artists of the Renaissance era. In respect to their different approach towards shape, room, and work of art, the differences in their styles resulted in dissimilar descriptions. Renaissance and Baroque seem to concentrate towards the treatment of space, appearance, and color. This uniqueness affects the description of a painting and therefore it cannot be seen. More so, than in comparing Perugino's Christ delivering the Keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter from the Early Renaissance to Caravaggio's exchange of St. Paul from the Baroque style.

The great thing about art, is that there are multiple portrayals of one idea but, the artist’s own personal style allows one to feel something that another may not. Early Renaissance painters, Giotto di Bondone and Duccio di Buoninsegna established their own unique style to depict a biblical scene known as, The Betrayal of Christ. Through a close analysis of each artist’s representation of, The Betrayal of Christ, one is able to compare and contrast the artists own understanding of the scene through their attention to detail, character, and space throughout the painting. When examining these two works, one will have a stronger emotional response towards Giotto’s interpretation rather Duccio’s, due to his methods of handling organization, figures, and space.

The works of Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo influenced the art of the 16th century in Italy and Europe in many ways. Three of Michelangelo’s works such as: The Last Judgment, Pieta, and David were great works during his time. Leonardo da Vinci also contributed great works to the 15st century such as: The Last Supper, St. James in the Wilderness, and The Mona Lisa. Although there were some similarities in Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo’s works, their differences and uniqueness is what made their works great masterpieces of the 15th and 16th century.

The introduction of perspective to the world of art has significantly changed the way art is created. Painting’s like Masaccio’s “The Holy Trinity and The Virgin” have “played a pivotal role in the history of art as both a definitive example of Early Renaissance linear perspective and as a kind of prophetic forerunner of the prospective method discussed nearly a century later by Leon Battista Alberti” (Aiken 171). According to Jane Andrew Aiken, Perspective hadn’t really been used much when the time “The Holy Trinity and The Virgin” had been revealed to the world. The painting had definitely received a notice by many connoisseurs of art for its different painting style and focus of topic. Religion was an obvious main focus during the time Masaccio had done this piece and the fact that he had drawn about the crucifixion of Jesus Christ had caught many people’s eyes. The use of perspective in Masaccio’s “The Holy Trinity and The Virgin” causes the depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ to be the main focus in the artwork and give a sense of depth to the painting to the viewers despite their point of view.

Art in the Medieval Times was dreary and bland. Many works of art were solely about God or holy figures. The most obvious change from the Renaissance to Medieval Times was the arts, according to Document A and also that “One begins to know the names of the artists ... feel stronger emotions in the subjects”. This shows that Renaissance art not only changed in style, in changed in how it made the viewer feel when seeing the art. Similarly, in Document A, Renaissance art is described as “new artistic styles would echo the broader movements and interests of the new age.…”. As compared to Medieval Times, the style of art became something similar to the time that people could relate to. In the Medieval Times, art was just meant to extol God’s many feats. People who viewed the painting were supposed to put that style of art on a pedestal. Medieval art was supposed to be worshipped, not so much understood. The individual in the Medieval Times was supposed to take away from the painting that the only thing that mattered in their life was the Roman Catholic church and God already had a plan for their lives. But in comparison, Renaissance art was supposed to empower and help people of the time to understand themselves and the fact that they can change their own lives.

Leonardo da Vinci was one of the stunning craftsmen back in the 1500's. He was a painter, stone carver, planner, builder, and a researcher. Amid the Renaissance, the depictions that he drew were colossal. He drew works of art like the Mona Lisa and the Last Dinner. He went to different spots to influence his fantasy to work out as expected. Leonardo began off as a collaborator, yet transformed into a pioneer and a craftsman later in his life. After Leonardo turned 15, his dad chose to take him to a renowned craftsman named Andrea del Verrocchio. A significant number of the painted assembling of Verrocchio's workshop wound up noticeably executed by method for his faculty. Concurring with Vasari, Leonardo cooperated with Verrocchio on his sanctification of Christ, demonstrating the more youthful holy messenger holding Jesus' robe in a way that was to date better than his lord's that Verrocchio put down his brush and not the slightest bit painted once more. This is most likely an exaggeration. On close exam, the show tells about a decent arrangement that has been painted or touched up finished the gum based paint the utilization of the new strategy for oil paint, the wide perspective of a nature scene, the stones that might be seen through the dark colored mountain stream and a significant part of the observing of Jesus demonstrating the veracity of the hand of Leonardo. Leonardo himself can likewise have been the form for 2 works by Verrocchio, which incorporate the bronze statue of David inside the Bargello and the Most elevated amount holy messenger Michael in Tobias and the Heavenly attendant. By the age of twenty, Leonardo confirmed as an ace inside the association of individuals of St Luke, the craftsmen and specialists of prescription, yet even after his dad set him up in his own workshop, his connection to Verrocchio turned out to be to such an extent that he kept on cooperating with him. Leonardo's soonest perceived dated depictions is an attracting pen and ink of the Arno valley, drawn on August 5,1473. Leonardo da Vinci is altogether different from alternate figures in World History. Leonardo da Vinci was an exclusive tyke until the point that he was mature enough to work for Andrea del Verrocchio. He

More than simple geometric composition style and use of linear perspective, The Last Supper reflects Da Vinci’s skills in conveying emotions through gestures

Leonardo's "Last Supper" is a priceless piece of art with much hidden meaning and obvious talents bestowed upon a wall. Under the study of Verrocchio as a painter and a sculptor, he was able to use his skills in creating a very detailed and a very naturalistic piece of work that would be remembered for hundreds of years. He was also able to create characters with amazing individuality. Not only was his portrayal of the characters magnificent, but the symbolism he used which emphasized the story being told in the "Last Supper".

I have been greatly impacted by all of the artists, styles, and types of art we have talked about so far in Art History I. We have looked at sculptors, paintings, architecture, and prints with varying styles, from a numerous amount of artists. While I am intrigued by mostly all of what we have studied, The Last Supper paintings catch my eye the most. Many artists have successfully completed paintings of The Last Supper including, Tintoretto, Paolo Veronese, and Leonardo da Vinci; however, da Vinci was the first, original painter of The Last Supper. My favorite Last Supper painting definitely has to be the one by Tintoretto. Tintoretto’s Last Supper painting truly represents various key aspects of art; from the usage of colors and shadows, all the way to the numerous groups of people taking on various different tasks.