A. When dealing with Pablo Picasso’s pieces of work, either a person adores them or hates them. I began noticing Picasso’s art and style of art on the History Channel’s show Pawnstars. He always had a different way of seeing art, like if all the students in the classroom were drawing circles, he would be drawing squares and acute angles. His oil painting of Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, is one of his great forms of cubism. Also, a form of unfairness towards Africans at the time (Such as Disney’s film, Song of the South). Picasso did view Africa and Africans as savages at the time. Numerous historians would classify Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, as a piece from his “Nergo Period” due to France heavy trade with Africa at the time. Historians, scholars,
How does Pablo Picasso’s famous art “Guernica’ represents the history and society in his time?
The social state of France was the final reason for the French Revolution. The French social class was divided into three classes that included the clergy, nobles, ant the common people. The First estate was made of the higher and lower clergy. The higher clergy lived amongst luxury while the lower clergy were miserable. The Second Estate was made of the court nobles and provincial nobles, the court nobles also lived in luxury and the provincial nobles did not enjoy the same treatment. The Third estate was made of common people such as farmers, cobblers, and sweepers. In document 10 it presents a political carton that shows people of the upper-class standing on and crushing someone of lower class. This shows how the upper class were riding
I feel like in some of his work, people may be very offended by his work because of the message that it showing to people. Take Jillian Steinhauer’s critique for example, when she says “What does it mean to put a young black man on a horse and call him Napoleon? If it isn’t dangling a fantasy and false hope, then at least it implies that young urban blacks are in desperate need of uplift. You call that empowerment?” (Steinhauer 1). Steinhauer is explaining that many different people question and criticize Wiley’s work because they do not understand the message that Wiley is trying to show. Steinhauer wants to question the audience of what is the point of doing these kind of paintings. His paintings should not be based on just colored people, but more of the other races as well. I also think that he can do some black and white paintings as well as dark colored paintings for a change because most of his paintings are made with bold and bright colors. His paintings can also be expressed in different colors instead of just relying on bold colors to make his painting stand out. Another negative critique I have about him is that in most of his paintings uses either a floral and regal background, and it gets too repetitive and boring sometimes. Sometimes it doesn’t matches the aura of what the original painting. I feel like his
Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (The Young Ladies of Avignon, and originally titled The Brothel of Avignon) is a large oil painting of 1907 by the Spanish artist Pablo Ruiz Picasso (1881–1973). The work portrays five nude female prostitutes from a brothel on Avinyó Street in Barcelona. Each figure is depicted in a disconcerting confrontational manner and none are conventionally feminine. The women appear as slightly menacing and rendered with angular and disjointed body shapes. Two are shown with African mask-like faces and three more with faces in the Iberian style of Picasso's native Spain, giving them a savage aura. In this adaptation of Primitivism and abandonment of perspective in favor of a flat, two-dimensional
There were many early expeditions from Europe to North America, most in search of a
The Princesse de Lamballe (a close friend of Marie Antoinette), fled revolutionary France to rally foreign support for the monarchy. Despite being in the safety of the English court and knowing the dangers that awaited, she returned to France out of a deep sense of loyalty for her friend and queen. Before returning, she made sure to write out her last will and testament, knowing that in the midst of the revolution she would be presented with no other opportunity to do so.
The nobility of the Kingdom of France has been evaluated by various scholars of history. There is something to be said, however, for those who chronicled their impressions while living them in the 17th and 18th centuries. The excerpts of Charles Loyseau’s A Treatise on Orders, written in 1610, and Isabelle de Charriere’s The Nobleman, written in 1763 provide two very different glimpses on the French nobility from differing time periods. From these two accounts, it is clear that there was a marked shift in the way some viewed the nobility and their role in the operation of the French state. While Loyseau praises the nobility nearly wholeheartedly,
I believe that the view of ethicism is best for understanding the relationship between ethical and artistic value; therefore, I do agree with Eaton’s statements about Guernica and Rape of Europa. Eaton states that in terms of judging a painting ethically, it is how the artist represents the unethical action that determines its goodness. Therefore, Picasso representing the horrid actions in Guernica in a manner in which evokes a feeling of discomfort in the audience is a commendable artistic response. However, Rape of Europa is inappropriate because of the way Titian represents the horror of rape in a satisfying manner as if it is meant to be aesthetically pleasing. As a result, Eaton claims that Picasso’s painting is likely to be appreciated
The French Empire is the greatest empire in the world because at the peak of its reign, the French had conquered over 4.9 million square miles, which is 1/10 of the all the land on Earth. Because of this, architecture, cuisine, and culture got spread all over the world. The French Empire reigned for 428 years and that’s just another reason why it was the greatest of all time.
The lifestyle in France, just like in all other European countries, has changed dramatically since the early 1700’s. People went from farmers to factory owners to all of the professions of today’s society. The main reason for the great changes in lifestyle that occurred in France was the Industrial Revolution, which urbanized most of France. But the Industrial Revolution was not the only thing that changed France. The monarchy fell the church changed, and the role people had in their jobs and family life change drastically.
In eighteenth century France, the ambiguous terms of “public life” versus “private life” affected the everyday life of politicians, entertainers, and the private lives of many married couples. In Jeffery Merrick’s essay “Sexual Politics and Public Order in Late Eighteenth-Century France: The Mémoires secrets and the Correspondance secret” he endeavored to portray the public’s fixation with private dealings and affairs was partially due to the family being perceived as the model for relations between authority and their subordinates. The view of this family model being so crucial to public life in turn meant that anything that disrupted the family model and relationships was detrimental to society. Inappropriate sexual behavior within private life was publically believed to damage the stability of the authority-subordinate relationship model; therefore the French saw private activities as a concern of the public for the well being of society.
Hey Samantha, I agree with you on the shock value part. It seem like Picasso was inspired, but from other people’s stories (the travelers and merchants) coming back from Africa. I do agree, that he was breaking out of the norm, and trying it hand in painting African art. I do feel like, if he did travel to Africa, for himself, he may have got a better idea what Africa is. Even still to this day, some people picture Africa and Africans as savages and undeveloped society.
The world is filled with many forms of art. No matter if it’s paintings, animations, graphics, or photography. However, paintings contain back story and many more emotions. Pablo Picasso is a great example of a very skilled painter. He was able to plant all his emotions into a vacant canvas. Not only that, but he was also a very influential painter because he started at a young age, most of his painting skills were innovated, and he also created his own form of painting: Cubism.
There are several art movements that Pablo Picasso is associated with. Throughout his life, Picasso experimented with diverse styles and media in his art. An art movement that was invented and further developed was early 20th century by Pablo Picasso and his close friend Georges Braque, it’s known as Cubism. Ever since the renaissance, this art movement was just the beginning to the evolution of the way artists represented form and space. Cubism is known as a way artist used different views of subjects together in the same picture, resulting in paintings that appear fragmented and abstracted. Instead of creating illusion of depth, it really helped emphasize the two-dimensional flatness of the canvas. This art movement became the most influential style of the 20th century. A major component within Guernica is the use of symbolism. Picasso had an amazing imagination, he knew that by using grisaille technique in this painting, it would set a somber mood, expressing pain and chaos, resulting in displaying powerful imagery. In this art piece you can see various elements incorporated that displays a bold statement on political awareness to its audience so uniquely. In the history of 20th century art, Cubism is the greatest invention done by Picasso that was very influential.
The painting, Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, was painted by Picasso in the year 1907 and is the most famous example of cubism painting, as it is considered the first cubist piece of artwork. With this piece Picasso marked an extensive break from the traditional characteristics of painting, he abandoned all aspects of traditional art with this piece. He veered far from the representation and form often seen in traditional art at the time. He depicted five naked women prostitutes in a brothel, but the women were far from realistic. Picasso had drawn them nothing like the traditional paintings of women. Their bodies were made up of flat, splintered planes rather than rounded volumes, their eyes were drawn lopsided, and their faces were off putting. With this painting Picasso did things that no other artist had contemplated at the time. This visual violent piece evokes and liberates eroticism. This piece and its unbinding desire was unprecedented in art and in the culture of that