Level 5 Health And Social Care Level 3 Unit 5 P1

In this essay I will be analysing the communication and interpersonal interaction that took place in various sectors such one to one interaction, group interaction and how effective these skills and other elements in the health and social care setting such as the environment was being demonstrated.

I was wondering if you could contact the residents in 1103 about their two dogs barking?

M1- Discuss how policies and procedures help children, young people and their families whilst the child is being looked after.

M3: Discuss the care strategies that can be used to support individuals with each physiological disorder.

In this report I will be describing different patterns of ill health and who and how they are monitored. I will also try to explain different factors that affect our health, not only now but I will try to discuss how different factors fight effect our health in the future, I will then evaluate the influence of the government have on factors that affect ill health.

A health service is a service that provides care and is under the NHS. For examples hospitals or a G.P. They provide treatments but also prevent illnesses through health promotions. A social care service is about providing support to individuals to help them get by and who ever needs it such as emotional support or practical support with daily living tasks.

I believe promoting and providing DIPPS is important in everything we do. I am working within a retirement home and the job of the health professionals is to provide a safe and comfortable environment where we try to help maintain their independence while allowing them to live a life as close to their original state. A lot of the residents who reside in this home is accompanied by some form a dementia, schizophrenia, frail bones, communication impairments, physical issues and sometimes it may be hard to complete daily tasks such as, eating, sleeping peacefully and maintaining the safety in the environment. As health care professionals working with individuals whose behaviour may never be certain, we try to work our way around

If I have computer or electric problem, I would not undertake to repair by myself but consult technicians. I always forward safeguarding issue for health and safety executive. I always set maintenance schedule help.

Reporting of Injuries,Diseases and dangerous occurrences regulations of 1995 requires the reporting of work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous occurrences. The Act applies to all work related activities, but not to all work related incidents. The objective of the regulations is to enable the enforcing authorities to identify where and how risks arise and to investigate serious accidents so as to prevent them from occurring in the future and thus providing a safer work environment. The enforcing authorities can then help and advise you on preventive action to reduce injury, ill health and accidental loss,the main points of our own policy that relate to this are:

Health and social care organisations increasingly need to work together in partnership to get better value from the available resources and improve services and outcomes for service users, by improving quality of support for service users. Good relationships between partners, a common vision and understanding of expected achievements and what outcomes need to be delivered are critical to the success of partnerships. This will enable a more responsive service, which is well co-ordinated approach to the service delivery, and better value for money by ensuring reduced duplication of services.

No Secrets – Guidance published by the Department of Health, builds upon the governments respects for human rights and highlights the need to protect vulnerable adults through effective multi-agency work.

Does Sports Bar Grill have a reasonable cause of action to sue Reliable Power and Energy due to poor maintenance of the utility lines?
 
                          Brief Answers

This matter has apparently been ongoing for a number of years (and well before it was reported in REO). Based on the last report by Altisource and Ocwen, Ocwen has approved repairs of the code violations for over $150,000 and the ETA to complete is the end of July, 2016. Our concerns relate to the economic analysis provided by Ocwen and managing the repair process through to completion, which is required to fully resolve the demo order. Based on the “Estimated Loss Severity” provided by Ocwen, the “worst case” scenario reflects a loss severity of 132.65%. Altisource indicated they felt comfortable with a repaired value of $198,000 (barring any drastic market changes). Altisource is also basing this off of an as-is value of

The electrician doing the removal examined the wiring from the switch and noted to the engineer that it was CT wiring. It was distinguished that it was one of the two CT circuits coming from 3652, one which was shorted and one that was not. The one that was not shorted was previously daisy chained from relay to relay in the previous protection scheme and work on that circuit was thought to be all removed two weeks prior when the engineer was on site for decommissioning. The cabinet in the field was examined and the cables were noted which CT was and what CT was not shorted. Upon returning to the control room the CT cable running to the test switch was determined incorrectly by the engineer to be the shorted CT and the A phase circuit was cut and opened by the electrician. Upon cutting of the wire the circuit was instantly noted to be live by the nature of the “buzzing” of the cut wire. North dispatch desk was contacted to see if PCB3652 could be opened so that the circuit may be examined safely while saving possible damage to the CT’s on PCB3652. When PCB3652 was opened the “buzzing” stopped further confirming the wrong circuit was opened. With the breaker open the cable was examined in the field and it was noted that where the cable came out of the conduit in the panel that the wire had burned the insulating jacket off. The circuit that was opened was a remaining leg of a daisy chain that supplied current for differential

The customer must be satisfied that a solution to his problem is found getting a secure, safe and continuous supply of good quality electrical power. The main concerns related to the supplied power were: that voltage levels were too low and variations too high (i.e. not within ±5% tolerance), regular power failures, and phase reversal issues on certain days. To address these concerns the initial plan was to determine if the claims made by the customer were true and then find ways in which to first address it without the least inconvenience to the customer. I sat down with the Head of Network and Plant Performance and worked out that I needed to arrange for: Voltage levels to be measured and adjusted it if possible (by adjusting tap positions on transformers, switching in of Capacitor banks or voltage regulators), remove unnecessary loading on supply feeders to the Taung Substation and reconfigure the network where possible to provide alternative paths for load to flow, measure the three phase load balance and reconfigure connected loads to provide an even spread of loads across the three phases. If these actions couldn’t resolve the problems then proceed with recruiting a team of subject matter experts to conduct more detailed investigation to ascertain the physical condition of the Taung Village 11kV feeder, then verify and record what hardware was used in the construction of the feeder and also the standard to which the structures were build and the hardware used.