Level Privacy Settings Should Be Good For Protect People From What They Say And Post

"We collect the content and other information you provide when you use our Services, including when you sign up for an account, create or share, and message or communicate with others” (Hachman). Each day people live with a false security that they are protected and maintain a sense of privacy. Citizens misplace their trust in social media and technology, and divulge their personal information in ignorance of the repercussions that may arise. Users say the advances in technology and social media will not affect their privacy; however, it is proven that these advances can be a harbinger of both danger and discontent.

This right has been introduced in order to stop others from commercially misusing his or her identity, be it either a celebrity or a normal person without their permission. A person can be forced to take down the content in question or pay monetary damages to the individual whose rights of publicity has been violated. By referring to the case of Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.[ 830 F. Supp. 2d 785 (N.D. Cal. 2011)] , which is about an action lawsuit that arose after some Facebook users discovered their names and photos have been arranged in the perimeter of news feeds. The plaintiffs were able to prove that “direct, linear relationship between the value of their endorsements of third-party products, companies, and brands to their Facebook friends,

Social media has become a world stage for many people to display and share their accomplishments, failures, and even their shenanigans. No one seems to care anymore if their boss, spouse, or conservative grandmother knows how wild that party they attended over the weekend was, or who their romantic fling was with that week. It’s a sad fact and even though most people do it, posting ones every day move can still affect their job and personal relationships.

Myspace contract required registrants to provide accurate information concerning themselves when opening an account and to refrain from using information obtained from Myspace services to harass other people. The prosecution would turn out into a criminal matter.

But to this day privacy is no longer private, social media has options to place posts on private to where no one else can see them but the person who had posted them. But does that stop people? No. People post whatever they don well pleased without any regard to the consequences of their actions, and people ask if they can have a little privacy. Again the answer is no. I would like to say that our society is in the webs of Pandora’s Box, Greek mythology taught us that Pandora’s Box, if open would release all evils upon your humanity. Instead of twisters, earthquakes, and hurricanes we have cyber terrorist bullies and the dreaded

I certainly agree with staying away from multiple social networking accounts. Not having multiple accounts will limit the chance of coming across an attacking online predator. People do not understand that whatever one posts, whether it is deleted or not, stays with you forever which can also affect job opportunities. With technology evolving, and people learning more about this world, staying far away from social media is a safe thing. Hacking is very big in this world. With certain networks as their friend, it helps hackers achieve their goal of committing identity theft. The growth of fake profiles posting false things is steadily rising and should be put to rest. Personally, I would rather put my page on private to only people I know. That would be a better and safer way to manage my

Although the Privacy Act and PIPEDA exist to regulate what personal information is collected in order to protect the employee, these legal means are not enough. The common thread between the two is that the information collected should be collected and used for the stated purposes. The Privacy Act applies to federal institutions, whereas PIPEDA applies to the private-sector, yet neither specifically state social media. As mentioned in this article, the person’s privacy rights should not end simply because the technological advancements are not incorporated into our legislation. However, privacy laws should be able to incorporate social media as it is one of society’s most common method of communication. As society changes, our laws should accommodate. I believe the current criteria are not specific enough, if just cause can be proven and if there is no discrimination, that is seen to be enough for termination. I think that the better option would be the proposal set in this article.

As I was writing this, I felt that it was less of a violation if the photo was of the backside, than of the front. Personal identifiers, I guess. However, you are right; the whole point of the website is to take away what little dignity that person had away from them. I would project my mentality about public appearance on to them. For example, if I go to Wal-Mart, I’ll wear what I deem appropriate to the store and my neighborhood, and even the time. I’ll be shabbier at 11:00pm Friday than 2:00 pm on Saturday. I am sure what people wear in Wal-Mart varies quite a bit from city to city, hell, even neighborhood to neighborhood. Taking a picture of someone that has acceptable attire for one neighborhood

Status Labs also recommends that clients change their privacy settings on social media to prevent other people from accessing private information. Unless someone is a public figure or uses social media for business marketing, Status Labs actually recommends that social media accounts get deleted. Additionally, they recommend that individuals change their passwords at least four times a year. Individuals can also search for their name online to make sure that only positive results

Social Media is a current way in which people are using to interact with one another daily. Since the launch of various Social Networking Sites (SNS) its been a huge attraction in a new way to share information with others and correspond with interests of your choice in many different forms. Although social media sites allow users to share information with friends and other sites on the internet, many people are unaware of how their privacy is getting out. Now that the expansion of global connection through these social media networking sites are so highly present in todays society, giving us easy access to information, the lack of one's privacy is being diminished. Everyday peoples privacy rights are

so if that person who posted it tries to delete it it’s still going to be on social

Furthermore if you don’t share info about yourself,  others will – you get tagged in photos, info will be posted in your wall and all this is influencing and creating persons image. You could also say that persons Facebook-image is a result of collective  collaboration. What is said or done as teenage could be found 30 years later and you can’t be sure that the viewer considers the time that has passed. Also it’s creepy to think that in future there is more and more literally dead people in social networks. Facebooks mortality arrangement

However, this practice has been noted to be beneficiary in understanding the character of an employee or student. Going through their profiles would reveal more on their relationships and interactions with other people. This would help organizations get the rightful applicants because an error in this could result in irreparable harm. Even so, as this practice becomes widespread, people would always clean their accounts before interviews to depict the needful and erase the undesired. This way, employers and schools would not gather useful information as the profile would have been customized to impress. Additionally, people could operate Facebook accounts to be used for interviews. Such accounts would contain what would be considered desirable for interviewers. They would have other accounts for normal socialization. Therefore, at the end of it, interviewers who access their Facebook accounts get wrong information on the interviewee.

When social media sites first started the users had lots of control over what others could see and how published information would be distributed, however as time and user numbers have increased companies found it profitable to sell certain information and demographics to paying companies. These companies are the ones paying to keep social media sites up and running. Someone must financially support the growing social media companies and since it is free to users, marketing companies are paying for our history and surfing information. While that may be the best solution for these social media companies it is not the best solution for users. There should be an option to pay for use instead of being tracked and stalked. After all what is the price of privacy? While not everyone would take advantage of this privacy ‘buyout’ the option should be available. Even without that option, it should be the user’s decision to either accept that data tracking is happening, or have it turned off for the general profile. Before you enter a site that tracks and sells browsing history there should be a warning label of sorts. As social media companies continue to increase both the size of their market, and

Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information