The Liberal Party has traditionally been known for its success in appealing to a range of different regional, social and ethnic groups. Since the establishment of the party, it has lacked a clear core principle and structure because the party was made up of diverse groups of interests. The party could sometime be seen as more supportive of social welfare spending than their Conservatives counterpart. However, it could also commonly be understood as a tactic to counteract the threat posed by the New Democratic Party. Although the Liberal Party is seen to be geared towards a pro-business orientation in the recent years and reduced its social policy commitments, the party has nevertheless stayed with their centre left position on issues such …show more content…
In a general sense, the “biggest challenge for the Liberal Party is determining and defining what [it] actually stands for." This indicates that the Liberal Party today has struggled to find the "ideological sweet spot, the ability to blend business-oriented liberalism with a version of social liberalism sympathetic to equality of opportunity." Therefore, when asked what the Liberals stood for, Liberal representatives often respond with vague generalities. In most cases, it could be seen that the Liberals hope to balance their economic and social policies so that they don’t favour one over the other. In reference back to the "Fairness for the Middle Class," it shouldn't be seen entirely as a support and benefit only in economic terms. In fact, the plan includes an aspect called Canada Child Benefit which "provides greater, tax-free, monthly support to low-income families." Therefore, the plan appears to be an economic policy but includes a social sector which benefits the lower class too in a deeper context. Seen in this light, the Liberal Party should not be seen as one that hopes to develop an economic-based identity. Social policy has always had a primitive role in the Liberal Party. For that reason, the move towards the economic side should be seen as an attempt to incorporate it alongside the social sector. However, it is not intended to give up on social policies since it could be seen that the Liberals always weigh themselves equal on both
The Liberal party was successful in the past due to its ability to reinvent itself in order to meet the changing circumstances and needs. The ‘proactive’ Liberal was strangely absent in the pre-2011 election campaign and turned themselves into a reactive and passive entity just to defend and respond to the opposition’s unscrupulous campaign of personal attacks and vilification. Liberals were always based firm on their political values and philosophy; however, these vital elements of the party were not seen to being used during the campaign for 2011 election as much as it was seen being caught in the mud-tossing against the Harper Government.
After 11 consecutive years of being in power, the Conservative Party led by Mr. steven harper which believed in individual responsibility economically have been defeated during the election. They were defeated by the Liberal Party led by Mr.Justin Trudeau The Liberal Party believe the government has responsibility for helping families, individuals, and communities who have economic difficulties. They also believe in creating social programs that support the communities such as the welfare system. It is a system that gives money to people
The Liberals main party platform has many benefits but it also has many disadvantages. The Liberals have proposed to raise taxes for the Canadian upper class. But lower the taxes of the Canadian middle class. I predict that the majority of the Liberal party’s supporters consist of middle class and working class citizens, as it most benefits them. Although lowering the taxes of the middle class and working class was an amazing idea to gain more supporters, raising taxes of the upper class was not such a good idea. The Liberal party is losing votes (and possibly the support, financial and otherwise) of the upper class. If the liberals were to lower the taxes of the middle and working class but keep the upper class taxes the same, I feel that the liberals would gain a significant amount of supporters.
In a recent interview in the Ottawa Citizen, Justin Trudeau spoke on his decision to increase taxation on the wealthy upper class in order to redistribute money to the middle and lower class. This is in response to the issue of stalled median household income where Canada’s GDP has doubled yet household income has only increased by 15% (Kennedy 2015). This hints at income inequality in Canada, as it sheds light at the struggle of middle class families to provide for their families. Parents are having to choose between their retirements or providing education for their child (Kennedy 2015). To Justin Trudeau, this means that “something isn’t working anymore” (Kennedy 2015). Most likely, he senses that the way money is earned and distributed in Canada is highly unbalanced, leading to a income gap between the rich and the poor. Trudeau’s solution to middle class worries is to increases taxation on upper class
The further development of industrialisation led to social and economic inequality. This led to a revision of classical liberal ideas to prevent the spread of ignorance and poverty. It is suggested that modern liberals have betrayed classical liberal ideas as they embrace collectivism and diverge from classical liberalism on issues such as freedom. However, it can be argued that modern liberals have simply built on classical liberal ideas such as its commitment to the individual.
Liberal beliefs on various issues. On terms of property, Liberals believe that the redistribution of wealth would cause for a more just society. They also believe that the government has the responsibility to take from some and give to others. They are more open and accepting of societal change, such as same-sex marriage. Unlike Conservatives, Liberals believe the primary cause of crime is poverty. Poorest neighborhoods have the highest crime rate because the people are hopeless and have no opportunities. The Second Amendment gives the right to bear arms. Liberals have a narrow interpretation. They believe Americans have too many guns, cause violence, and have access to guns too easily. on terms of Abortion, Liberals believe abortion is a
One of his first points he brings up is young people today not identifying with the party. While they may vote for the party, they don't identify themselves as liberal because the party has grown out of touch. After following the recent election, I can relate with that statement. Many people around me begrudgingly voted for Clinton just because the other option was much worse. From my standpoint Clinton represents the drift away from the idea of being a party for the people.
The Liberal Party's membership of Canada is committed to the fundamentals that have developed and sustained the Liberal Party from any other political party; individual freedom, responsibility and human dignity in the framework of a just society; political freedom in the framework of meaningful participation by all interested persons, and the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides the framework for both a democratic society and for the interaction of members within the party. It is also devoted to equal opportunity for every person, to the enhancement of our unique and diverse cultural community, to the recognition that English and French are the official languages of Canada, and to the preservation of the Canadian identity
Out of all the political parties in Canada, the Liberal party is the party that matches my beliefs and values the best. From their plans for the environment, to the economical agenda, up to social issues, their beliefs are quite similar to the ones I have.
As Canadians and individuals from around the globe progress toward the future, today’s world is plagued with a reoccurring theme of income disparity. Now more than ever, social welfare has become a vital asset in combating the thresholds placed on Canadians nationwide. Historically, such a theme has been prominent and each time the onus has been placed on the government to combat such situations through social welfare. With each individual holding a different idea of the ideology they find befitting, the chosen method can severely impact the trajectory in which these policies are implemented. With today’s society has continuously being dominated by corporatism and greed, a movement toward equality is critical in allowing Canada to grow and prosper collectivity. Based on current Canadian conditions and analysis of both
Assumptions about human nature in order to create social justice. According to Mill, social justice is “the idea that we can put in place a set of political institutions that will ensure the just distribution of benefits and costs throughout society.” In other words, social justice is in the hands of the government to create certain institutions that will greatly benefit everyone, and equally so. In order to do that, one must have an idea of the way human nature works so as to institute programs and such appropriately and properly.
The main thing that the classical liberals focus on is people’s freedoms which they didn’t have under feudalism. In the classical liberal tradition they also begin to focus more on using science to explain things rather than only using religion and god.
Liberal Perspective: For the liberal’s perspective they believe in equal opportunity and equal rights for everyone. Liberals are mainly democratic, which is why some of the things that democrats believe, they believe as well, mainly because both of those parties think the system should help more. For example, when it comes to homelessness from both a democratic and liberal stand view you can see that they both are in the interest of helping them. However, in a liberal’s eye, they believe that social issues happen because there should be more help from the system as far as funding goes.
With the myriad of philosophical differences that occur between the two sides, it is expected for people who belong to each school of thought to vote for, and against, certain measures. Liberals, for example, are more likely to vote for issues that grant more freedom to individuals in their personal lives. They are also more likely to allocate government money for support services for the needy. Wiggins clarifies this by adding that "The main focus of modern liberalism in the United States is voting right for all adult citizens, equal rights, separation of church and state, protection of the environment, and the provision by the government of social services”
Liberalism is a political philosophy that is founded on the ideas of liberty and equality and controls how a society functions. Since liberalism is expressed as a political ideology, it helps dictate how a nation can achieve its national security, its stable economy and the extent of control a government should possess. The perspective of the source illustrates how government intervention is needed during the threat of national security. Although, during times that national security is not being threatened, the collective society should have the freedom to break from the unnecessary government control. A philosopher such as Rousseau would have agreed with the position of the source as it gave an option of security to the people - but also gave them the choice to break the contract if they believed their rights were being violated. While a philosopher such as Hobbes would have disagreed with the source on the terms that he believed in a monarchy and believed that people needed government control at all times. Furthermore, as liberalism provides people their freedoms but also allows a certain extent of government control, the source should be taken to an full extent on the grounds that government control should only be emplaced considering national security, government control, and economic stability - which is shown through the internment of Japanese-Canadians, the New Deal, and the Patriotic Act.