Liberalism In Australia Essay

The United States and Australia’s conservative politicians and critics are more reluctant to accept climate change is a dire issue, unlike countries such as Great Britain and Germany. This is due to the factors of; the difference of perspective on conservatism, limitations due to parliamentary structure and environmental ideology viewed as a newer element to politics. The perspective of conservative politicians plays a key role in the influence they have over policy making and the public. Depending on their view on climate change, they can limit or expand exposure to the environmental crisis. Parliamentary structure, such as Australia’s two-party system can be restraining for smaller parties which support policy making for the environment. A country’s approach to newer ideology like climate change, can be resistant depending on their traditional values.

The Trump Presidency has lead to major changes in foreign policy, but none sparked as much shock and outcry as the removal of the United States from the Paris Climate Accord. Perhaps the underlying problem is that the accord, which trump described as “draconian”, was seen as a step in the right direction for so many others. At its core, the accord put restrictions on companies all over the world to help decrease the effect of global warming and climate change. More than anything else, it was a symbol of our country's commitment towards protecting the environment, along with it the lifestyle of generations to come. This change in policy shifts America away from international environmental cooperation, and signals Trump’s alignment with American freedom above all else.

With an increasing number of refugees from Syria and pressure from the international society, last year, the United States made a controversial decision of accepting Syrian Muslim refugees. Though this is considered a reasonable humanitarian act, I believe that it could cause terrorist attacks and financial problems.

In December 2015, almost 200 countries around the world, gathered in Paris to sign an accord to slow global warming. Only three developed countries did not agree with the accord. To most, it may seem that preventing global warming is necessary to protect future generations from heat waves, super storms, and extreme flooding. Classical liberalism can provide the best explanation of why some countries choose to ignore global warming.

The people of Syria are being killed by bombs, chemical weapons, starvation and dehydration (“What’s Happening”). The U.S has donated 4.5 billion dollars in aid since the conflict has begun (Long), but merely providing money does not suffice for proper aid. Syrian people's homes and livelihoods have become diminished into nothing but rubble. One million people have applied for asylum in Europe; however, the United States must rise up and offer resettlement opportunities to this war-torn community, as well. The benefits reaped from opening borders to Syrian borders are not just limited to maintaining America’s core purpose of freedom and opportunity for all, but they also extend to fulfilling economic and strategic interests.

The United Nations Security Council responded to growing threats posed by terrorism in Syria along with humanitarian concerns in the country with Resolutions 2150 and 2249, the first of which calls on member states to fight genocide and crimes against humanity. The latter resolution gives member states authority to fight terrorist groups and prevent terror acts. It specifically mentions ISIL, ANF, and Al Qaeda, but leaves intervention open to combat all other terrorist groups. This constitutes the authorization by the Council for the use of force in a non-member state, in the interest of international peace and security. Following these resolutions, Syria has seen worsening violence, ongoing civil war, and increased refugees resulting in an estimated eleven million displaced Syrians. Many scholars have sought to evaluate how this authorization affects the legitimacy of the UN Security Council, and most of the arguments made fall into one of three schools of thought: liberalism, constructivism, or realism. Liberal conceptualizations take as a given the inherent value of the institution and may seek reform of the procedural aspects. Constructivism views legitimacy as a product of perception and tries to consider the Syrian intervention in terms of how member states and non-member states viewed the Council and the extent to which they believe it was legitimate in the authorization. The realist interpretation evaluates legitimacy under the

The Siege of Aleppo and aerial bombardment by Bashar’s allies are ‘excused’ by the stories of Isis’s actions – despite the fact Bashar has magnitudes more to account for. The horrors of the genocide and ethnic cleansing in Burma/Myanmar, and the deathly silence from the ‘international community’. The conflict in Yemen – where the oppression by one faction is replaced by oppression from another. The Muslim refugees entering Europe risking life and limb on dangerous seas; exploited by racketeers; blamed by politicians, despite the images of their dead and orphaned children.

Breaking news! US strikes Syrian military airfield in first direct assault on Assad government (Vanden Brook paragraph 1.) Syria has been at war with itself for six years and dozens of countries are stepping in to “make a difference.” When Syria’s Civil War broke out in 2011, the U.S. aided the rebels with non lethal supplies but the assistance soon shifted to training, funding, and intelligence. The U.S. has a specific goal in Syria, to retain peace and veer away from the use of chemical weapons. Despite this “reasonable cause,” citizens are not responding well to the government 's action. The United States has been ineffectively involved in Syria’s civil war since the beginning and has

Balancing humanitarian concerns with U.S national interests is essential in determining a strategy for the refugee crisis in Syria. According to the UN Refugee Agency, there are approximately 2.5 million refugees, more than half of which are children. Not only do such atrocities conflict with the moral fiber of democracy, but also present serious risks to the economic well-being and security of the United States. Current research as well as historical reference illustrate that U.S foreign policy being implemented in the region is ineffective and at times counter-productive. If issues regarding the refugee crisis are not dealt with promptly, the potential for Syrian cooperation is greatly decreased, and the likelihood of civil war expanding to neighboring countries is significantly greater. Based on expert opinion, the following recommendations should be taken into consideration:

The Merits of Liberal and Realist Arguments: Explaining the decisions of all major states to sign the 2015 Paris Agreement to address climate change and global warming

Thesis: Millions of Syrian refugees are being hunted and displaced from their homes, while the majority of the world closes their blinds from this present day massacre. Resolving the Syrian refugee crisis is a complex and daunting task, but the future of their lives rest in the palms of our hands and it is our moral obligation to interfere and aid the innocent.

Foreign intervention in the Syrian Civil War will only result in a high price to be paid, mainly the US’ loss of support on the international front as well as the financial expenses that the US would incur if involved militarily. Such civil wars and intrastate conflicts between rebel groups and the government can be resolved through diplomatic negotiations that can avoid these expenses (Frieden). The US is not financially secure enough to engage in yet another bloody conflict in the Middle East, particularly one as convoluted as the one in Syria. The usage of the word convoluted is significant in that it remains uncertain who the non-FSA and who the actual leaders of the rebellion are. According to Frieden, it is difficult to gather information about who is a part of these militant groups because they are covert and because terrorist groups have incentives to exaggerate. Furthermore, should that question and the identities of the FSA be resolved, how would we distinguish the innocent from the terrorists? Both important actors in these uprisings, the Syrian government, and the Free Syrian Army and other rebel fighters, have participated in what may be considered international war crimes that have resulted in a multitude of civilian deaths. The

This paper will be divided in three parts, beginning with a brief background on the global warming agenda and tackle the issues surrounding the Kyoto Protocol. The second part will look at climate change and the protocol from the respective lenses of realism and liberalism. I will argue that while none of the theories precisely covers the entirety of the issue, each provides helpful analysis falls short of clarifying the entire climate change picture. Can states cooperate effectively through the structure of the Kyoto protocol to solve an international problem of global warming?”

within the confinements of liberalism and with respect to traditional human rights, however, the central governments have managed to bypass the creed of liberalism and human rights. 2) Redrawing the boundaries, or reducing the powers, of internal political subunits controlled by the national minority; decisions on the boundaries and powers of internal political subunits. Some liberal democratic states engaged in redrawing boundaries which are within the confinement of liberalism and the liberal state, but encroaches the rights of national minorities. The central states draw boundaries to disempower national minorities. For instance, a minority 's territory are divided into several units to make cohesive political action impossible. For example, the division of France into 83 ‘departments’ after the Revolution, which intentionally subdivided the historical regions of the Basques, Bretons, and other linguistic minorities; or the division of Catalonia region in Spain. 3) Language policies; decisions on official languages. In many liberal democratic states, the majority language is adopted as official or de facto official language where it is used in government, bureaucracy, courts, schools, and business. While there are exceptions to this – many liberal democratic states allow for multilingualism – yet the policies related to language should be more robustly clarified within the human rights creed of democratic liberalism. Because the human rights creed adopted by several

Growing concerns and levels surrounding the climate condition of the world was vindicated by the late Peoples’ Climate March campaign in New York City on September 21, 2014. However, the main problem is sustaining the fragile climate change coalition and building on the current momentum to strike a global agreement by the 2015 climate summit in Paris. The coalition is threatened mainly by the multitude of actors involved and their unsymmetrical interests.