Liberalist Approach To Terrorism Essay

Security measures drastically increased after 9/11. 9/11 was an act of terrorism that would change the way the country handled privacy. Americans needed to voice their opinions after this happened and have their own rights protected. The need to protect individual rights is the utmost important aspect in a thriving U.S. society.

“The danger that darkened the United States of America and the civilized world on September 11, did not pass with the atrocities committed that day”. (Ashcroft, 2003) The terrors of 9/11 caused increased security that comes at a cost that many feel is an invasion of their charter rights. The idea of racial profiling is not new, but many feel worse than ever in today’s anti-Muslim society. This habit of losing civil liberties in the wake of terror is to some an unnecessary change that is unallowable, but leaves many wondering if we should sacrifice our freedom for safety.

   In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks of 2001 and the U.S. military action in Afghanistan, moral questions have arisen. This essay will consider such questions.

Terrorism and the United States A cloud of anthrax spores looming in the sky of San Diego California

Terrorism is certainly not innovative and despite the fact, that it has been documented throughout history, it is moderately difficult to define what terrorism is. When it comes to discussing terrorism, it has been publicly understood from either exploiting or threatening the brutality in order to enhance a political cause; this can be confusing as there isn’t a universally approved definition towards terrorism. For instance, the Global Terrorism Index has analysed that 64,000 people were killed by specific enactments of terrorism throughout 2002 and 2011. This is an interpretation of how terrorism has become one of the most exceedingly political problems throughout the previous half century. There are a variety of law enforcement, researchers and policy makers who have so far been unsuccessful when it comes to defining terrorism; this is why I will go into depth about the difficulties that come towards defining terrorism.

There are individuals and organizations within the United States who maintain the same ideology that resulted in the growth of left-wing terrorism in this country in the 1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s, right-wing extremism overtook left-wing terrorism as the most dangerous terrorist threat to the United States. In recent years these left-wing groups have been lumped into a category of Domestic Terrorism by Homeland Security and broken down into four broad categories of left-wing, right-wing, single issue groups, and homegrown Islamic. However, the left-wing tend to be smaller groups of protestors that periodically indulge in window smashing or throw rocks at the police, but the bombings, bank robberies and gunfights with law enforcement do not occur anymore by these groups. Leftist extremists also pose an espionage threat to U.S. interests. Left-wing terrorist groups of today often pose a threat to cyber-security by conducting cyber-attacks and protest the racial segregation within the inner cities, the threats of climate change, soaring inequality and disparities of the educational system. Many leftwing extremist groups are not hierarchically ordered with defined members, leaders, or chain of command structures but operate as loosely-connected underground movements composed of lone wolves, small cells, and splinter

the US into a protracted war, and some experts linked the war to the creation of a vacuum through which more terrorist groups have arisen. But even a decade after the war on terror, there remained several agencies believing that “terrorist networks could be taken down by removal of their ‘masterminds’”, and that “smart weapons and pilotless drowns could achieve without counterproductive political effects.” (Townshend)

There have been many actions taken by the government since September 11th to assure the American people that things are back to normal and to make us feel safe again. The federal government has approved secret military tribunals for accused terrorists. The Patriot Act has given law enforcement unprecedented powers to tap phones,

ith their ally the U.S. and others. The source of Israel’s anger and distrust towards Iran and its nuclear capability stems from Tehran’s previous references to annihilating Israel multiple times and the country’s development of long-range missiles and support towards militant groups present on Israel’s border who are a constant harassment. Israeli president and Nobel Peace laureate, Shimon Peres, even pleaded with the Iranian population by stating, “I would like to say to the Iranian people: You are not our enemies and we are not yours. There is a possibility to solve this issue diplomatically. It is in your hands. Reject terrorism. Stop the nuclear program. Stop the development of long-range missiles”. Saudi Arabia along with fellow

Think of the word terrorism. What is the first thing that comes to mind? One might think of kidnapping, assassination, bombing, or even genocide and guerrilla warfare. Because it is such a broad and complex issue, an all-encompassing definition is hard to formulate. The United States Department of Defence defines terrorism as…

There are three main realms of political theory: realism, liberalism, and constructivism (Snyder 53). Realism is essentially the shifting of power between nation-states as they gain or lose military might in the international arena. It assumes that peace comes from a balance between states as they seek what is in their self-interest, and that less powerful states will coalesce against the more powerful hegemony (Snyder 55). Realism falls short in that it fails to be able to adapt to changing international norms in what qualifies as a nation-state, such as explaining why the U.S. would go to war with a group like Al Qaeda. Additionally, it tends to ignore the strong ideological focus in the U.S. on creating democracies, or to explain why other nation-states have not joined together to combat the U.S.’s hegemony (Snyder 59). However, it does tend to explain the nation’s strong military response to terrorist attacks and shows of military strength such as Pearl

The 21st century began on September 11, 2001. In June of 1914, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo precipitated the first war that would define the 20th century. The attacks of September 11 will be the precipitating moment of a new kind of war. The kind of war everyone will be on high alert. Everyone is the United States of America will come together and help each from this tragedy. The United States of America now sees a national security threat raised to an unbelievable level. However, the USA also sees an opportunity to solidify international support and national unity during this time. International cooperation and national unity will be critical to a sustained war against terrorism, and their prospects for success

Terrorism is a form of violence that is difficult to define. The State Department defines terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience." Terrorism is not a random, undirected, purposeless act of violence, it has definite goals and violence is the medium of attaining those goals. The most well-known, recent instance of terrorism were the attacks made on the World Trade Center on September 11th , but terrorism goes back to first-century Palestine, where Jewish Zealots would publicly slit the throats of Romans and their collaborators. Because the causes of terrorism are so deep-rooted and

The immediacy and the primacy of any truly potent force is the ability to perpetuate itself. Sharp and energetic outbursts have their place, and can be known to have great effect-cataclysmic forces, despite their maximum destructive potential, are temporary in their total effects in relation to some absolute goal. In other words, they are generally limited in scope, and well defined in purpose; there is a tactical objective, which is usually consummated quickly. The more dreaded force creeps along, escalating incrementally, and while it may abide a strategic goal, or even a policy, it is generally open-ended. This sort of ambiguity I am referring to differs from the flexible tactical necessity in that strategic outcomes are very much

Terrorism…This is a very common word in today’s society. What does it mean? Or more importantly how do “we” prevent it and if necessary combat it? The word most commonly used to explain this is counter terrorism, but is also known as anti-terrorism. The military is a great force in combating terrorism with specialist groups in nearly each branch of the armed forces. Prior to the September 11 attacks the United States Armed Forces worked hand in hand with NATO and the United Nations combating terror. However after these attacks, the United States Military has become a widely utilized entity on fighting terrorism.