What determines the right of life? Who determines who should die or be saved? In the story “The Lifeboat,” written by Rosetta Lee, it is up to the passengers of a sinking ship to determine who can be saved. There are ten passengers aboard the ship but there is only one lifeboat that can hold six people. The other four passengers will surely die. The passengers include, a lifeguard, a woman who thinks she is six months pregnant, a recently married couple, a senior citizen who has fifteen grandchildren, an elementary school teacher, thirteen year old twins, a veteran nurse, and the captain of the ship. Even though the decision of who should not be allowed onto the lifeboat, and therefore die, is a difficult one, it is possible to make this decision …show more content…
Since the woman only thinks that she is pregnant, the nurse should do some sort of basic test to determine whether or not she really is pregnant. If the woman is pregnant, she should be allowed onto the life boat; if she is not pregnant, she should be left on the sinking ship. The decision to leave this woman on the ship is supported by The Fairness Approach. The decision to leave the woman, if she is not pregnant, is, “fairly based on some standard that is defensible,” (Velasquez 276). Another ethical theory that proves that leaving this woman behind is acceptable is The Deontological Theory in that, “human beings are morally required to do certain acts,” this act, being to tell the truth concerning her false pregnancy (White 279). If she is pregnant, then she should be allowed onto the lifeboat. Letting the pregnant woman on to the lifeboat is supported by the Virtue approach; by letting this woman and her unborn child live it is providing, “for the full development of our humanity,” (Velasquez et al.277). The possibility of this woman lying about her pregnancy is very high, which is why, it is crucial for the nurse to give her some type of exam. Anyone would do whatever it takes in order to save their own life on a sinking ship in order to prevent their families form misery, just as this woman is possibly doing in this case by falsely stating that she is …show more content…
They have paid no dues to society. Not saving this couple is supported by The Common Good Approach. This “option best serves ethe community as a whole,” (Velasquez et al. 278). On a more romantic note, since the couple was recently married staying on the boat allows them to die with each other. The couple has no special gifts to offer the community, and neither of them has given the slightest reason that they should be saved. The Justice Approach could also be used to support this decision. This, “option treats people equally or proportionally” to the others in the decisions (Velasquez et al. 278). As mentioned before this couple is not doing anything in society that makes them stand above the crowd. This couple has no support in order to be saved, and they should be left on the sinking ship to
Garrett Hardin argues for a very harsh thesis: we simply should not provide aid to people in poor countries. His argument is consequentialist: he claims that the net result of doing so would be negative -- would in fact be courting large-scale disaster. One of the things that we will notice about Hardin's essay, however, is that whether he is right or wrong, he paints with a very broad brush. This makes it a good essay for the honing of your philosophical skills; you should notice that there are many places where the reasoning procees with less than total care.
In some ethical and legal respects a pregnant woman and her fetus can be considered separate. Both the woman and the fetus are ordinarily affected by the well-being of one another for as long as each of them live. The ethical and legal issues are challenged deeply in cases where the well-being of the fetus and the mother appear to be in conflict. Our society struggles with identifying cases where the pregnant woman’s interests and/or behaviors might put her fetus at risk. Criminal and/or civil commitments should be used to bar pregnant women from exposing their fetuses to risk.
In the article “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor”, the author Garrett Hardin raised the question that whether the rich countries should help people suffer from poverty. He claimed that the supporting strategies for the developing countries, including the World Food Bank could result in more severe recourse inadequate issue and other disasters. In addition, a large number of immigrants flood in the US could ruin the natural environment and social balance. In that case, the author argued that regardless of the current situation, privileged nations should not provide aid to people trapped within difficulties of the underdeveloped nations. Even though, his
“An ethical dilemma exists when a choice has to be made in which the consequences may have a potential positive or negative outcome.”("Topic 4: Contemporary Ethical Dilemmas (How do managers evaluate beginning-of-life dilemmas?). ", n.d.) The given scenario presents a patient named Jamilah Shah, who is of Turkish descent, 90 years old and collapsed at the side of her bed in the extended care facility in which she resides. The patient suffers from Chronic Pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus. The patient was rushed to the ER were the EKG and lab tests revealed she suffered a heart attack and she was started on anticoagulants. The patient has no advance directives and a communication barrier exists, the ER department contacts the emergency contact, one of the patient 's sons Bashir. The patient 's family arrives at the hospital and her son states that he makes the decisions and the wants a do not resuscitate order for his mother and no medical intervention other than comfort care. The social worker handling Jamilahs case is concerned by her family 's lack of support and that the family 's wishes are at odds with the patient 's request for help and her expressed desire to live. Furthermore if the patient does not receive a cardiac catheterization or is considered for a coronary bypass, she will surely die.
In the essay Lifeboat Ethics by Garrett Hardin and the essay A Challenge to the Eco-Doomsters by Walter Benjamin, there are many things I agree and disagree with. Both essays make very good points with facts to back them up. But I can’t help but side with Hardin on his essay Lifeboat Ethics. In this essay I am going to compare and contrast some of the similarities and differences between Hardin and Benjamin’s essays about the aid the United States provides to poor nations all over the world by reducing pollution, controlling population growth, and the dependency of economical imports and exports.
Hardin begins to describe how there are fifty people sitting in the lifeboat, with a total capacity of sixty. There are one hundred people swimming in the water, begging to be let on the lifeboat. The people that are on the lifeboat to begin with are the rich people who feel guilty that they already have a spot. Hardin believes that the people shouldn’t
Since 1991, the southern half of Somalia, a poverty stricken African nation, has seen various tribal militias battle for dominance and power over individual regions of the country. Violence has plagued Mogadishu, the capital, since warlords ousted the former president. Mere months after the collapse of the government, men, women and children in torn clothes ran helplessly towards packages dropped from military planes towards the hot sand of their tiny village. This action was one of many attempts to help underdeveloped nations receive food by the United Nations' World Food Programme. Within his article titled "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor", Garret Hardin, a well-known philosopher of ecology, analyzes the difficulty
Nurses are faced with ethical dilemmas on a daily basis, each situation being unique and requiring the nurse to set aside their own values and beliefs in order to properly care for their patients. Situations requiring nurses to make an ethical decision are diverse and dynamic; the values set out by the College of Nurses of Ontario code of ethics remains the same. Therefore, all decision based on these vales regardless of the setting and circumstances ensure consistent solutions. The scenario involves a woman who was admitted to the NICU due to complications during her sixth month of pregnancy. The patient indicated that no extraordinary measures should be made to save her baby; she became further detached when the baby developed a bleed
Nurses are constantly challenged by changes which occur in their practice environment and are under the influence of internal or external factors. Due to the increased complexity of the health system, nowadays nurses are faced with ethical and legal decisions and often come across dilemmas regarding patient care. From this perspective a good question to be raised would be whether or not nurses have the necessary background, knowledge and skills to make appropriate legal and ethical decisions. Even though most nursing programs cover the ethical and moral issues in health care, it is questionable if new nurses have the depth of knowledge and understanding of these issues and apply them in their practice
In addition to the Nursing Code of Ethics, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) states that one of the standards related to the RN scope of practice is that nurses evaluate the patient’s response to nursing care. They do this by evaluating: the patient’s response to interventions, the need for alternative interventions, the need to consult with other team members, and the need to revise the plan of care (NCSBN, 2012). When Ms. W saw that the patient was not compliant, she should have reevaluated her plan of care. Ms. W can delegate to the LVN, who is experienced in prenatal education, and would be able to explain the importance of finishing antibiotic therapy or performing tests that are essential for a healthy pregnancy. If Ms. W is too busy to educate, then she is responsible for finding someone
The process of deciding when a terminally ill patient should die lies within the patient, family members, and the
Would you put your own life at risk to save someone else? What if they had a low chance of survival, and it was likely that the both of you would die? Many people would say yes. Ultimately, one has to look at this situation through the lense of an ethics approach, and which one is best for the situation. The short story “Bread” by Margaret Atwood describes different ethical dilemmas in which the reader is given different scenarios in which they must make a choice that can only come by deciding what their ethics are. Five different ethical approaches are described in the article “A Framework for Thinking Ethically”, which describes the meaning of ethics and the different viewpoints surrounding the topic. Out of these different approaches highlighted in “A Framework for Thinking Ethically”, the utilitarian approach along with the virtue approach would be best for solving the dilemmas presented in “Bread”.
When engineers design a product many things go in to the decision making process when it comes to selecting materials, design, and the manufacturing processes. One concern that has always been in the decision making process is trying to make sure the outcome will always be ethically good, although this isn’t always the case. Try as they might, no person is perfect, and accidents do happen. When engineering disasters happen there are many factors that may be involved, such as human factors, design flaws, extreme conditions, and materials failures. When these things do happen it is important to look at the ethical aspect of each part of the failure and
Ethical dilemmas exist everywhere around us in everyday situations. Something as simple as picking up a piece of trash off the floor to whether you should use a previously written paper from a separate class for a current assignment in this class. It exists in reality and even on television shows. How, then, do people resolve these ethical dilemmas and how do they defend their decisions? Nurse Jackie is a television series impregnated with ethical dilemmas, especially in medical care. In this paper, I will discuss the ethical issues found in the “Tiny Bubbles” episode of Nurse Jackie. I will further discuss the ethical reasoning with support of ethical principles. In addition, I will discuss how patient’s autonomy and non-maleficence principle of bioethics plays a role in decision making. Overall, there was a difficult struggle on the ethical theory of and utilitarianism, with ethical relativism playing a huge factor.
The egoist’s choices would align with the Kantian ethics person in the sense that would they would bring Doctors, fisherman, navigators on board. Thus, people of skills to ensure the survival of an egoist would be let onboard. Because they look after themselves first, they would start by letting the skilled people on board. In their reasoning it would ensure max survivability of themselves. The secondary effect would be it will also benefit the other 49 on the boat or how ever many he or she decides to keep on board. They would also set up a watch to keep the other in the water out of the lifeboat. Not in the interest of others but in the interest of the Egoist themselves. If they had to turn to cannibalism they would be for cannibalism, and most likely they would say we have to murder someone so we can survive another week or two. If they are threaten with being jettisoned off the boat, they will point out the flaws of others and argue they are not the right person to throw overboard. The downfall here is the egoist will get desperate and everyone else might see through them and throw them over board. A group of sixty egoists is not a good mix; no one would want to do something for everyone. Therefore, this group of egoist would have been better off in the water because their have slim chances of survival.