preview

Like Plutarch's Crossing Of The Rubicon

Decent Essays
Open Document

Julius Caesar’s, The Civil Wars, differs from both of the previous sources for its primary origin. In this source, Caesar focuses on military tactic. Because this source is primary, it goes further into the motivations of Caesar in crossing the Rubicon. For example, Caesar explains that Pompey had been, “alienated from him and led astray by them through envy and a malicious opposition to his glory, though he had always favored and promoted Pompey's honor and dignity.” Like Plutarch’s, Roman Lives, this source also portrays the bond between Caesar and his soldiers; Caesar states that the “soldiers of the thirteenth legion… all cried out that they are ready to defend their general.” In this source, the crossing of the Rubicon is viewed as more of an honorable act, in contrast with the other sources, especially Suetonius’s Lives of Caesar. …show more content…

This major event sparked the transition of the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire; however, Plutarch, Suetonius, and Caesar each depict different aspects of this monumental event to show its importance. In Plutarch’s, Roman Lives, Caesar is described through personal anecdotes that show both a ruthless and extremely ambitious side of the political leader, and a humble, more caring side of the soldier. Suetonius portrays Caesar as a manipulative politician, motivated by a need for power. While Caesar himself takes a more militaristic viewpoint of the events. While these authors may have opposing perspectives, it is clear that their depictions describe one of the most important events in history, and that each was written in an attempt to describe the motivations and actions of Julius Caesar which lead to the Roman Civil

Get Access