preview

Lily's Dissonances

Better Essays
Open Document

independence she believes Lily retains, she frequently shows herself as incapable of living up to her own standard. As “she never wanted James to grow a day older or Cam either”, we see her overbearing attachment to her children despite her own belief that “when they were older, the perhaps she would have time” for the things “she would have liked to do herself” (Woolf, 64). Mrs. Ramsay seems to cling to the idea of Mother and child as “objects of universal veneration” and often defines herself by this domestic relationship despite acknowledging that they deprive her of time to pursue her own passions, thus attenuating her own independence in the process (Woolf, 59). Through many of her narrative voicings, and indeed in Mrs. Ramsay’s domestic …show more content…

Ramsay that regards her as an archetype for the female form, and because of this, Lily is denied contentment due to her awareness that she and Mrs. Ramsay are dissimilar in many ways. In Part III of the text, Lily effectively fulfils the role of the now-dead matriarch, but upon this, she is also required to address the fact she is not, and never will be, Mrs. Ramsay. At the beginning of this section, Lily repeatedly laments Mrs. Ramsay’s death and is so preoccupied with the loss that she was “unable to do a thing, standing there” (Woolf, 164). As Mrs. Ramsay was often the Muse for Lily’s work, Lily’s art reaches a point of stasis after Mrs. Ramsay’s death in which Lily is haunted by the vision of Mrs. Ramsay and unable to find inspiration in anything else. Yet, it is this art that also allows Lily to lessen the extent to which she is “involuntarily haunted” by Mrs. Ramsay and subvert the order to ensure that “dead are at the mercy of the living” (Whitworth, 102). Instead of trying to emulate Mrs. Ramsay’s life by ousting herself into marriage, as Paul and Minta unfortunately did, Lily turns back to her art as a statement of her own individuality and therein “she finally says yes, not to a man, but to her own art” (Goldman, 61). By divorcing herself from the idea of marriage, Lily creates distance between herself and Mrs. Ramsay and represents “an alternative, creative path for women, than the marriage …show more content…

Contrary to Woolf’s critique of Wells writing style, it is clear that while the style of the narrative may be vastly different, there is also a wealth of shared thematic interests between the texts; the exploration of the unconscious and undermining of aesthetic values provide cardinal roles in both. TtL must be read as a work of dissonance in itself, in which every character’s perspective and narrative framing helps construct the whole – the novel in this case. Throughout the text, “characters sympathise and speculate about one another; they fill in details of another’s past”, and it is only through this consideration of numerous perspectives that, similarly to the construction of the text, we are able to piece together the many facets of the characters found within, thereby understanding the nature of division (Levenson, 24). Regardless of Woolf’s apparent disdain for realism, the text presents a thoroughly realistic construction of perspective displaying “how life, being made up of little separate incidents, which one lived one by one, became curled and whole” (Woolf, 53). TTM is a work equally born out of division, through which Wells navigates his own dissonance. Therefore, it is not surprising that the protagonist is also trying to navigate the unconscious in order to reconcile his simultaneous, yet incongruent, scientific and emotional drives. Through literature, Wells and

Get Access