preview

Lincoln's House Divided Speech After The Civil War

Decent Essays
Open Document

Regardless of the President’s original words, the Civil war was fought over slavery, not state’s rights. This is evident from the Emancipation Proclamation, in which Lincoln frees all slaves in rebellious states, the President’s House Divided speech, and the Dred Scott decision. The Civil War was one of the most devastating battles in American history with the death of over 2% of the population. During the war, President Lincoln, who as also the commander chief, used his executive power to abolish slavery in all of the rebellious states. Although this was a tactic to strengthen the Union, it also put an end to slavery and weakened the South. Without the Emancipation Proclamation, the North may not have won the war and would never have abolished slavery. “By declaring free all slaves in states rebelling against the federal government, it signaled the beginning of the end of slavery in the U.S.” (Emancipation Proclamation Issues and Controversies). Lincoln’s House Divided speech was one of the most famous during his presidency. This speech addressed the tension between slave and non-slave states. Still, Lincoln believed there was only one outcome could be; the house wouldn’t stay …show more content…

His original words suggested that the war was fought over state’s rights, but this was only to avoid the difficult topic of slavery, in which he tried to avoid forming an opinion on for the election. However, in 1860 Lincoln protested the infamous Dred Scott decision, or any movement that led to the expansion of slavery. During the decision, the Supreme Court mandated that it was against the constitution to give power to the states on the slavery decision, suddenly, slavery was legal everywhere. This was one of the most prominent components of tension in slave and free states, which eventually led to the secession of the

Get Access