Lindsay Case

Testimony this Thursday morning began with a New York State Police Investigator who is part of the computer crimes unit. She said her analysis of Michael Beard's phone is that there was quiet a bit of deleting and a lot of powering off, including more than 100 deleted calls.

In her article “Gendered Racial Violence and Spatialized Justice,” Sherene H. Razack explores the murder of Pamela George; the way that her murderers’ sentences were lessened because of a variety of factors pertaining to Ms. George’s life; and the fact that the murderers were young, white, and middle-class men.

A hispanic female named Anna Garcia who was 38 years of age, was found dead on the date of August 14, 2015 in Anytown, U.S.A. She was 64 inches in height and 165 pounds. The case of Anna Garcia first began on a hot, 92°F summer morning. A next door neighbor, Doug Greene, had decided to call police at 9:45 am to place his concern about Garcia because of her dog that had been barking all morning, which was highly unusual. Being that he had not seen or heard from her since the previous morning, he called her, then went over to her house to make sure nothing was wrong. Both the police and EMT arrived at 9:56 am. When questioned by police, Greene informed them that he had seen her the previous morning around 6:30 am walking her dog. He also stated that he saw her wearing a sweater, which was found odd because of the current heat wave. The front door had to be broken down in order to enter the house. Upon entering the house, they found Garcia lying face down in the entry hallway. Inside, the house was a temperature of 73°F. Immediately after Anna Garcia was

Quite often, there are scenarios or cases that are controversial and make it hard for one to discern the appropriate legal action or jurisdiction that ought to be taken. Resultantly, it has been hard for people to discern the right way they are supposed to seek justice or protect themselves when they face social issues. Quite often, most people result in engaging in uninformed decisions resulting from the social adverse issues that affect their lives. A perfect example is that of family violence or intimate partner abuse scenarios where most people often suffer the wrath of harsh treatments from spouses. In the context of Marcia Norman and Mitchell, a similar case prevails.

Michelle knight is a 34 year old Caucasian women who was born April 1981, later on moving to Cleveland Ohio where she was raised (Knight, 2015). Growing up she recalls not having a good relationship with her mother, she remembers “a chaotic childhood marked by neglect and abuse” (Connors, 2014). In school she was bullied and eventually sexually assaulted “By a group of males “resulting in her dropping out of school and later finding out her had become pregnant as a result of the assault (DURANTE, ROBSON & WARREN, 2013). Soon after she gave birth to a baby boy she named joey, when joey was around two years old he was taken to the hospital and treated for a broken leg, Michelle stated that her mother’s boyfriend purposely did it while under the influence of drugs. (Anderson, 2013).Child protective services was called and joey was temporarily taken out of Michelle’s custody until further notice (Anderson, 2013).

Because Ms. Ceballos’s father was the lieutenant of the Hialeah Police Department, her uncle, and stepfather employed with the City of Miami Police Department, and her aunt employed with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I plead out to battery/strong-arm robbery and placed on probation for four years. I also completed a six-month domestic intervention program and two hundred hours of community service. Upon completing all my court mandated requirements my probation terminated successfully and two years early for good behavior. If her family was not so well connected to the judicial system, I might have tried to take this case to trial; however, I wasn’t one hundred percent confident that I could beat the case and did not want to expose

Lea May, a very popular live streamer who goes by the name of LegendaryLea, has been banned from Twitch after being accused of flashing her vagina during her live broadcast.

Option 1- Deontological Evaluation: From the perspective of Kants this is an oral action because if the firms got to switch with Ad-X Corporation they would not like any errors to be hidden from them especially if they know about them. They would also want to know the truth, and if the other person is being loyal to them. The manager and the boss would not approve of being treated this way. Also, Kant states that we should treat people as valued autonomous individuals (ends). Ad-X Corporation would not have chose this firm if they knew errors would be kept from them. From Ross's theoretical perspective, there are multiple prima facie duties. While the corporation and Kelsey are meeting their obligation of fidelity, honesty, and non-injury to

I want to start off by clarifying the three main people in this case. They are Jack Wright, John Rock, and Sam Bigger. There are a few other people as well, but they are not worth noting. Jack is the CEO of Dryden Corporation and John is the CEO of Mega Corporation. John has been talking to Jack about the possibility of joining Mega Corporation’s board of directors. Sam Bigger is the chairman and former CEO of Mega Corporation. They need an answer from Jack by the end of the month in order to get his name in for nomination. However, there are some issues that Jack wants to think through and discuss with his wife before making a decision.

A limited liability company can be best depicted as a hybrid between a corporation and a partnership Kubasek, (2015). Like a corporation regarding limited liability, and its similarities to a partnership, in regards to the adaptability of dividing profit among the proprietors. Also, adaptability with respect to how profit and management authority are resolved (Oon, 2012). Shania would need to go into an extremely detailed agreement that spells out every one of the subtle elements of the business. The Colorado Limited Liability Company Act was received in 1990. An LLC consolidates the concepts of organizations for tax purposes and corporations for liability purposes (The Colorado Business Resource Guide).

In Pender v Lushington , Mr Lushington refused to count the votes of Mr Pender and his nominees in a general meeting. The refusal was treated as an infringement of Mr Pender’s personal rights. As an exception to Foss v Harbottle, Mr Pender could sue Mr Lushington under his own name or using the company’s name. This can be applied to Ko’s case, given that her personal rights were invaded, as a individual member and the minority in the company, she may have standing because this case is an exception to the rules in Foss v

- This case shows a range of breach of fiduciary duties; acting in good faith for a proper purpose in the best interest of the company; conflict of interest and making secret profits. It also showed the inability of the directors to understand the concept of conflict of interest.(Lipton, P.,2003, p.275)

"An individual shareholder has no absolute right to seek redress for a wrong purportedly committed against the company in which he is a member. The company in such an instance is the proper plaintiff to instigate such an action. Whether the company proceeds with the action will depend upon the will of the general meeting and its board of directors. Only in exceptional circumstances will the court interfere with a decision taken by the company to sanction the alleged wrongful act."

Observation: Valerie acts as both director and CFO of LHL. She could easily supersede the internal control of the company, thereby creating a greater risk of errors or fraud. Moreover, Karen and Angela are not complying by their job role. Authorising each other work without proper knowledge can lead to material misstatement.

If Diana had tried to talk the other directors out of proceeding with the loan and had voiced her concerns and had backed them up with positive action such resigning her position as director then she may escape liability. However simply abstaining from voting would not be enough to prevent liability. Diana can argued that she was not breach of duty under section 181