Liquidity vs Profitability

The liquidity of firm can be measured by computing certain ratio’s such as current ratio and acid ratio. For measuring Target Corporation’s 2014 liquidity; the firm’s current ratio and the acid ratio is computed. The company’s current ratio is 0.91 times which is computed by comparing current asset ($11, 573,000) with current liabilities ($12,777, 000) of the year 2014 (TGT Company Financial, n.d). The firm’s acid ratio is 0.26 times which is computed by deducting inventory ($8,278,000) from current assets. The inventory is deducted from current assets because the company has not received any money for the unfinished good or from unsold inventory worth ($8,278,000). To analyze the Target Corporation’s liquidity trend in 2014; the current ratio and acid ratio of 2014 is compared with the 2015’s ratios. In 2015, the firm’s current ratio was 1.20 times and the acid ratio was 0.45 times. These liquidity ratios reflect that the firm’s liquidity was better in 2015 than 2014. (See Table 1).

First of which, is the current ratio. It has been rapidly declining since 2000. To me this indicates that there is a liquidity issue. Each year their trade debt increase exceeds the increase of net income for the company. As a result, the working capital has taken a nosedive from $58,650 in 2002 to only $5,466 in 2003.

Increase in current liabilities Substantial increase in current liabilities weakened the company’s liquidity position. Its current liabilities were US$2,063.94 million at the end of FY2010, a 48.09% increase compared to the previous year. However, its current assets recorded a marginal increase of 25.07% - from US$1,770.02 million at the end of FY2009 to US$2,213.72 million at the end of FY2010. Following this, the company’s current ratio declined from 1.27 at the end of the FY2009 to 1.07 at the end of FY2010. A lower current ratio indicates that the company is in a weak financial position, and it may find it difficult to meet its day-to-day obligations.

The short term liquidity position for the company peaked in FY09, which was still disturbing as it stood below 1X the ability to meet its short term liabilities. The dip for FY10 is again due to a decline in its cash and cash equivalents, or quick assets, which were utilized to pay taxes. The cash ratio and quick ratio follow a similar pattern and are at levels which put the company at risk, as well as major stakeholders.

Liquidity and Capital

The DuPont system of analysis looks at the return on assets (investment) = Profit margin x Asset turnover.

The 1992 year-end cash balance does not meet the 5% optimal cash balance, thus there is no left-over cash which could be invested on marketable securities. However the projected 1993 year-end cash balance of 35,874 meets the optimal cash balance, with an excess of 25,108.75. These excess funds can be invested on marketable securities thus yielding a 7% profit (1,757.6). After paying taxes, the net profit from marketable securities is 1,054.56. Retained earnings would increase by this amount with a corresponding increase in cash and marketable securities.

Based on the data collected, as well as the analysis and comparison of other companies which were shown in class, it has been determined that Golf Galaxy lies in both fields. That is, they are focused partially on both the profit path as well as the turnover path. Golf Galaxy has a fiscal net profit margin of 6.7% which is fairly high in comparison to other companies, yet they also have a relatively high inventory turnover at 4.49/year, which shows that Golf Galaxy tends to turnover inventory at a fairly swift

Although, sales, income and growth through expansion generally have increasing trends, there are some items that were greatly overlooked. Its profitability performance is summarized in the table below:

Net income from continuing operations was $79.0 million and net income per diluted share from continuing operations was $0.89 in Fiscal 2009, compared to net income from continuing operations of $308.2 million and net income per diluted share from continuing operations of $3.45 in Fiscal 2008. Net income per diluted share from continuing operations included non-cash, store-related asset impairment charges of $0.23 and $0.06 for Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities, the Company’s primary source of liquidity, was $402.2 million for Fiscal 2009. This source of cash was primarily driven by results from operations adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. The Company used $175.5 million of cash for capital expenditures and had proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $77.5 million during Fiscal 2009.

Liquidity In analyzing liquidity of the company, the current ratio is not very telling of a falling company. The company increased its ratio throughout the period of the income statement thus building upon its company assets and allowing for a 6-1 ratio of assets over its liabilities. This implies the company is still able to operate sufficiently even though it did not make its optimum current ratio of about 8-1. However, when one takes the inventory out of the equation with the quick ratio, the numbers show the true strength of short term liquidity. The numbers are still good, and do not indicate failure – but are

Financial performance Revenue, DKK million Profit before special items, DKK million Tax on profit for the year, DKK million Net profit for the year, DKK million Operating margin (ROS) Return on equity (ROE) Return on invested capital (ROIC) 11,661 3,002 -683 2,204 24.9% 82.3% 139.5% 9,526 2,004 -500 1,352 22.0% 72.2% 101.8% 8,027 1,471 -386 1,028 18.1% 71.6% 69.7% 7,798 1,405 9 1,290 17.0% 147.1% 63.6%

YEAR 0 2009 1 2010 2 2011 3 2012 4 2013 5 2014 6 2015 7 2016 8 2017 9 2018 10 Initial Investment Gross Revenue 2 COGS 3 Add'l revenue Less: COGS Loan down payment 4 Loan repayment Depreciation Additional workers Land square required Moving cost 5 Operating Expenses Total Expenses Net Income Before Tax Income Tax Net Income After Tax After Tax Cash Flow ATCF Cummulative ATCF NPV through Year N

As Heineken Malaysia Berhad current ratio is 1.88:1, it actually have been exceed the ideal ratio for a company which is 1.5:1. This has shown that Heineken Malaysia Berhad have the ability to meet its short term liabilities. Other than that, as in 2014, the current ratio for Heineken Malaysia Berhad is 1.42:1, this has shown that they are operating their business well in general as in 2015, the current ratio has an improved from 1.42:1 to 1.88:1. Actually, the receivables, deposits and prepayment from current assets in 2014 is higher than the receivables, deposits and prepayment in 2015. This is because the amount due from a subsidiary in the receivable, deposits and prepayment section have a significant different between 2014 and 2015 for both trade and non-trade. The trade amount due from a subsidiary for 2014 is RM24,945,000 but in 2015, there is a zero trade amount due from a subsidiary for the year. Moreover, the non-trade amount due from a subsidiary also have a significant different of RM41,313,000 which because of amount in 2014 is 76,865,000 and the amount in 2015 is 35,552,000. Although, this can actually become a problem which can drag

When a company goes bankrupt, intangible assets depreciate at a much faster rate than regular assets; therefore, most pharmaceutical companies already tend to avoid debt. Therefore, in this case a high current ratio does not indicate unsatisfactory business condition, but a rather favorable and smart condition for the company.