preview

Literary Canons: A Literary Analysis

Decent Essays

In ninth grade I read Romeo and Juliet, a great literary work that is member of what would be called canonized literature. Canons, anthologies as used in the school system are lists of literary works, to be read by students. Canons limit the literary scope that a student will receive, restricting their overall understanding of literature. Literary canon, anthologies fail to encompass literary greatness, instead they are built more around affluence or influence. To be in literary canon is “not exactly greatness but more important, certainly- status and accessibility to a reading public”(Landow). To be included in such anthologies one must gain the backing of “influential critics”(Landow). Negating ability, connections to influential members …show more content…

The anthologies, literary canon of “influential critics”(Landow) is lacking, for instance “Few women writers have managed to gain entrance into such anthologies”(Landow). Despite the fact that women are obviously a huge portion of society, and there are probably just as many female writers, their works are not included. Trapped in socioeconomic restriction, sexism, and racism, many good writers are not represented, despite the positive impact their works could have. Pirofski gives the example that “the use of African American folktales by teachers in the classroom can teach respect for African American culture”. Due to the “exclusion”(Pirofski) of certain works, common literature is therefore not “representative”(Eshleman) of society as a whole. It is ridiculous that “influential critics”(Landow) of “high culture”(Landow) should be able to determine what is read. Not only are they restricting non-mainstream writers but they are determining “what subject matter was “appropriate”(Eshleman)”(Greer). Required reading lists, predominantly of more privileged writers, and sensored subject matter negatively shape the classroom, as well as …show more content…

Teachers should n be able to teach what they determine because they are better connected to the students, and teaching what they and the students will be more passionate about is important. Eshleman asserts that “Teachers have to make their own decisions” because they “can’t trust anthologies”. What is taught cannot be based on what the supposed authority dictates , teachers know the atmosphere in which they teach. Giving the the decision of what literature to include in English classes to teachers, promotes greater variety, and the opportunity for better and understanding and ability to analyze in students. In a transforming society, variety and teacher discession help students better than literary

Get Access