Literary
The passage, Isaiah 14:12-23, occurs within a “poem about the fall of the king of Babylon.” Leading up to Isaiah 14:12-23, Isaiah 14:1-11 discusses the fall of Babylon and the love of the Lord for his people. It also discusses how Babylon rises again. In Isaiah 14:12-23, Isaiah takes an imaginative trip to Sheol. After “The Fallen Day Star Passage” (Isaiah 14:12-23), Isaiah tells the reader how the people have a belief that God can conquer Assyria, Babylon, and even beyond. He also prophesizes that the ultimate destiny of David and his kin is that they will be strong; whereas, the Philistines will have an unfavorable immediate fortune. The Fallen Day Star passage fits into the overall poem of Isaiah 14 by explaining how “the
…show more content…
The poem is a lamentation. A lament or a qînâ, are verses that display a typical meter of 3/2. A qînâ has a climatic verse. The “climactic verse, which generally expresses the most painful lamentation, is positioned at about the middle of the poem.” Yet, Isaiah 14 is different and is not a typical “qînâ but rather as a māšāl, referring to the final deliverance of Israel. This suggests that, beyond the “elegy” about the death of a specific Babylonian tyrant, this song encompasses a larger dimension of meaning.” Isaiah is describing the death of the Babylonian king as well as looking forward towards the redemption of all of creation through conquering Lucifer. “In Biblical Hebrew, the verb [māšāl] means ‘to equal’.” The rulers, like Lucifer, have an aim and a goal of being equal to God. The use of the word māšāl, and the theme of equality also relate to the structure of the poem. The book starts out with ““You have become like us,” suggesting that the choice of this phrase to introduce the poem points to the existence of parallels/homologies in the song.” Scholars believe that the book is referring to other aspects of the whole canon.
The term “morning star”, found in verse 12 of chapter two, is a controversial term. Hirsch believes that the term “morning star” is literal and stands for the actual sun; whereas, other scholars believe it could be an allusion or metaphor. Motyer believes that the morning
Isaiah 58:6-14 is a very powerful passage. The first bible version that I read it in was the King James Version. That version didn't really make very much sense to me because of all the "thou's" and "thee's" and "thines". So then I looked it up again in the New Revised Standard Version. It was a lot clearer when I looked it up in that bible. There are a few similarities and differences from the different versions that I read. The two that stood out the most to me was the King James Version, and the New Revised Standard Version. The differences were like night and day. Probably because they were the first two that I read, and maybe because the King James Version, like I said earlier, has a lot of the "1800's language," like "thou"
From a historical and geographical perspective, the book of Isaiah is an accurate representation. A lot of what has been found through archeology supports the events in the book. The book of Isaiah focuses on the south kingdom of Judah. During the book, the North Kingdom is in the process of its down fall. The book of Isaiah gives us insight into the minds of the southern kings at the time. Thus, we are able to see the historical context of how the south eventually fell.
Isaiah takes the time to describe the beings that surround the King. He says (Verse2)
(1) That part of the solar day of twenty-four hours which is light (Genesis 1:5, Genesis 1:14, John 9:4, 11:4).
In Isaiah’s Immanuel, Dr. Edward Hindson truly dives into the book of Isaiah. Hindson helps us to grasp the importance and statute of Isaiah. He was not simply a prophet among prophets. He stands out as a citizen of Israel and a servant of God. Hindson does not hold back on his praises of Isaiah and agrees with W.R.Smith, that he is the second most important person throughout the whole story of Israel (2). Isaiah’s writings style still puts modern day scholars in awe. However, Isaiah’s Godly leadership is a principle throughout the book that far exceeds his other attributes. His wisdom, words, and visions from God guided the nation of Israel throughout the reign of Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. Hindon discusses the history of not only Isaiah
The book of Isaiah has a lot of unique historical, social, and political factors to it. The prophet Isaiah prophesied during the reign of King Ahaz and Hezekiah (740-681 BC). Isaiah mainly worked during the reign of Hezekiah, However; his first narrative was under King Ahaz in 734-733 BC. In which, King Ahaz was dealing with crisis regarding foreign powers and was struggling on how to protect his people. One of main themes in the book of Isaiah is that not to trust in human power but instead one should trust in God. Isaiah prophesied under a very complicated social setting, Isaiah lived during a time of rapid corruption in the government of Israel. He preached that the government was not following God's covenant. He also preached to the people of Israel who rebelled against God’s covenant. The prophet Isaiah also guided the leaders of Israel during very tough political times.
(This book has been translated to English from Hebrew so the paragraphs may make grammar mistakes)
Loader reveals that within it, “we have the most intricate chiastic composition in the Old Testament.” Smith points out that, “In Hebrew manuscripts and in most printed texts verses 2–8 are printed in two parallel columns so that the contrasting times are clearly juxtaposed. The list contains fourteen pairs of contrasts, ranging from external circumstances to the inner affections of a person’s being.” Doug Miller explains, however, that discerning the purpose and function of the poem is key. He suggests that, “There are at least five options for understanding the meaning of time for the twenty-eight elements found in the poem and the overall message of Qohelet’s use of the poem.”
I moved on to Joseph Blenkinsopp, who as usual, did not disappoint. Here I found the historical context of this section of Isaiah. Blenkinsopp referred back to Isaiah 58 to shed light on why the vision of theophany in Isaiah 60 had not been realized. Cyrus had release the Jews from Babylonian captivity, and those who wished to had returned to Jerusalem. But the “dominant frame of mind of the people being address (in Isaiah 58) is one of disorientation and disillusionment.” There is corruption in the government and judicial system, and among the religious leaders. The poor are neglected. Jerusalem suffers under “external pressures and internal dissention.” In chapter 60 the vision is unfulfilled; in chapter 58, God tells the
Verse 13-15 of Chapter 9 describes that when Jesus returned from the mountains, where he prayed to his father, i.e. God. However when the Jesus returned the disciples were not expecting his return, for which they were questioning each other, they were surprised to see that Jesus has returned, they worshiped him, ran towards him with joy and excitement but in their hearts they were afraid of the fact that what he might do or say to them. In Verse 16-27 of Chapter 9 it is described as how god healed a demonic boy. When Jesus asked the people what they are questioning about then one person stepped forward and said that he had come to see Jesus for the sake of his son who lost his ability to speak due to the spirit inside him.
The purpose of this paper is to highlight the main themes of Isaiah and Jeremiah. The main themes of Isaiah are: (1) Son’s Names as Signs. (2) Servant. (3) Holy One of Israel. (4) Redeemer. (5) Eschatology. The main themes of Jeremiah are: (1) God’s Policy with Nations. (2) New Covenant. (3) False Prophets.
From there, Ezekiel’s theme is focused on the condemnation of Israel for their sin. Ezekiel is also a prophecy that the fall of Jerusalem and the Babylonian captivity are necessary measures for the God of grace to employ if He is to correct his disobedient people and
The book of Isaiah provides a message to the nation of Israel and is one of the most powerful books of prophecy in the Bible. The prophet spoke of events to come that many have attempted to discern. Scholars, Rabbis and Christian Clergy differ in their interpretations of these passages in Isaiah 52 and 53.
Isaiah came during a pivotal time in history. The world was changing rapidly and life was on the edge of prosperity and ruin, as it is today. In this uncertain time Isaiah was called by God to deliver a message of warning, comfort, and deliverance. Christians view the prophecies of Isaiah as a projection of the coming of Jesus Christ. Isaiah spoke of divine judgment and the promises of God through the Prince of Peace. Isaiah’s message of the future King was very meticulous. He describes how Christ will come, Christ’s character and Christ’s purpose. In this paper I will dissect Isaiah’s prophecies in the Old Testament and reference them to the events of Christ in the New Testament.
Thus, the historical and political setting for Isaiah 40-66 could be spread across the rule of three dominant nations, Assyria, Babylon, and Persia. Boadt notes that while the theme of Deutero-Isaiah was Consolation, the overall theme of the book centered on God as the Holy One of Israel; foreign rule was God’s disciplinary tool, and God’s makes Zion the Divine dwelling place. (Boadt 1984, 417)