Live Action Versus Animation

I think the movie is better than the book because it’s more visual, has more action, and has props.

Finally there are lots of differences between the book and the movie. They also show that the movie was a lot weaker then then the book. I can see the movies aren't always better than the books. The books go more into detail than the movie. I enjoined the movie because it is more visual. The book was a little

I prefer the movie over the book because,it shares more detail.The book does not share the way they look but only gives us away to guess what they look like.The movie

One example of the imagery being better in the book is the forest. In the book the forest sounds big and beautiful. But, in the movie the forest is quite overgrown and there was not as much wildlife as I expected. Even though the forest wasn’t as beautiful as the book portrayed it, it is still quite an amazing sight.

I like the book better than the movie. I like the book better because I could decide what a scene would look like. For example, in the book, it describes True Son. It says, “The boy wore a brand-new calico hunting shirt. It covered the boy’s upper parts and halfway down his leggings. His hair was black and his face and arms brown as an Indian, but you couldn’t mistake the English cast of his features.” I could make up in my mind how I wanted True Son to look. In the movie, I saw what was on the screen, and couldn’t make the scene look how I wanted it

The movie was more interesting than the book because it helped me visualize the story. Most of the more exciting scenes from the movie are not in the book, this is why I like the movie more than the book.

Here are some different things I noticed about the movie and the book. In the book the characters were described in great detail when the main plot was being introduced. S.E Hinton did an amazing job describing the characters so the reader could picture them in their head. The characters have so much

I thought that the movie was a good adaptation to the text because of the elements in the book were captured and brought to life in the movie. You can feel the different moods of the movie,just like in the book. The town and characters seem to spring off the page and onto the screen,with mild exceptions. The mood is set very well with the lighting and sound,just as it would be in the books. An example of this is with the lighting,music and the costume choice.The choices that the

The film is better because rather than a book, which most people would rather to read, they are more likely to watch a film that turns up on T.V. Most people don’t pick up a book after high school but a film is something that people frequently watch. In addition to the massive range of the film, it, unlike the book, is presented with audio cues and visual images that the book lacks. Individuals, who don’t have the time or patience to read a book that is only words, can watch an animated and indulging film that diffuses the same message as the book and perhaps, even more because of all the characters that come to play in the

In the movie there was a lot more stuff going on and everything happened a lot faster. In the book it took so much longer for everything to happen, and in the movie it felt more “real”. In the movie we could actually see how dark and scary the city really was. The city was really dark and they had a lot of blackouts and they were running out of lots of stuff. Lastly, the mayor got killed and that’s what he deserved. He was taking from The City of Ember, and so they were running out, because he was taking it all. All in all, the movie was a lot better then the

Second the movie was easy to follow. The second reason was better because it showed what they were talking about. For example it showed them speaking clearly throughout the movie. As well as them showing the movements that they do throughout the movie. The third reasons why I think the movie is better because it showed the visuals better by helping the viewer understand what was going on.

First, the animation movements were easily recognizable in the film because Hubley shows them throughout Rooty Toot Toot. I think Hubley made an excellent creation because there are minimal animation movements with each character and all of them are not realistic. A lot of these characters

When making a distinction between movie and novel, it is not acceptable, in my opinion to talk about the differences between the two versions in terms of "better" or "worse." You may like how the artist creates a scene in the movie or how another artist plays with the same scene in the novel, but these are subjective preferences; neither speak to the quality of the work. You cannot critically compare different media, because you do not have a common set of terms with which to comparatively discuss the works.

(96) Virtual reality (VR) is define as a cybernetic simulation of 3D surroundings which can be interactive through auditory, sensory and visually stimulating equipment, i.e. gloves, headgear or headphones. VR is an incredibly recent development in technology and such has much room to progress with, I believe that VR is the future of animation as the key aim is to transport the viewer into the world we have created, VR being the next logical step as it creates this suspension of belief as well as activating all of the senses we use to perceive the real world.

When one thinks about the cartoons of the past, like TigerSharks, ThunderCats, and G.I. Joe, one will remember the rich story lines, the wild character profiles, and the inspiring battle cries of "Yo Joe" and "Thunder, Thunder, ThunderCats, Ho!!" With technology changing every day, a new form of animation has arisen. This new form is called "Japanimation" or "Anime." It is slowly becoming a part of this culture just as much as hamburgers and pizza. It still has a long way to go, but it is slowly creeping into the American genre of animation.