preview

Living Downstream

Decent Essays

An aspect of ecofeminism that I find useful is that it disagrees with the fact that women are still being dominated by men even though they have very similar duties in life. In Africa, women farmers are more poor than men farmers since their access to credit is less. Yet the women are the ones who produce over 70 percent of Africa’s food. As of more recently men are finding jobs in cities and towns to supply their home with an income and to keep up with the world’s evolving times. Since the men are at jobs all day and away from the homestead, it falls to the women to do the tasks that men previously did. Women are setting foot in nature for extended periods of time, being able to see things differently than men. Warren article states that …show more content…

The book is filled with factual evidence accompanied and supported by Steingraber’s personal experiences. I think that women are more likely to tell a personal story than men. Her personal experiences allow us to become more invested in a way on this topic rather than if we were just given straight facts. Steingraber also weaves nature and specific scenes of landscape in her many personal experiences. When her friend Jeannie was diagnosed with cancer again, they visit the Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge. And in future visits she often connects her friend to the time they were in the wildlife refuge. Each time she switches to her personal experience she relates it to a specific landscape. In the book, she tells us about MCF-7, an old and reliable breast cancer cell line that is used by many people in their studies. She meets one of the men who is using it in their work and she tells him that the cell line came from a woman who was a nun. The man is surprised by this and asks if MCF are her initials. Most of the people doing studies on breast cancer and using this cell line probably have no idea where it came from. But Steingraber views the cells as more than just an abbreviation and a tool to use, she wants to find the person behind the cells. Steingraber puts a name to the cell line, and gives them the identity of Sister Catherine Frances. The seven in the abbreviation refers to the amount of times needed to …show more content…

Everything we do and every decision we make affects not only those near us but the whole world. Also, the actions we choose to take now will alter the future in either a positive or negative way. Through the phenomenon known as the Arctic Paradox, where the Arctic, the place furthest from sites of contamination wind up the most contaminated. Steingraber says, “this is how the most pristine corner of the earth has become the most chemically contaminated”. When the chemicals were initially sprayed, they were intended to treat a specific area. But through the process of global distillation, air is constantly rising and falling steadily advancing towards the poles where it gathers able to move no further. Another important thing I took from living downstream is the fact that the food that we eat daily comes from all around the world. Steingraber says, “farmers have become as dissociated from those who eat their food as consumers have from those who grow it”. Instead of local farms supplying its surrounding areas with food, local farms produce very few crops that are exported to other areas of the world. When we think about it, we know very little of where our food comes from and what chemicals they are exposed to while being produced and transported. And most people do not care, all they want is to be able to go to the store and have everything readily

Get Access