Local Control Research Paper

Although the balance of power between the national government and the states has changed over the years, the federalist system is a fundamental part of the U.S. government (The White House, 2013). The states sponsor important programs to fund education, help troubled cities and provide social services. At the local level, the municipalities control a number of other services and regulations, but never fail to be in collaboration between the national, state and local governments. The constitution was put into place to support and defend the basic right of civilians of the United States (Marchant, 2003). Although the Constitution does not refer to education, operation and management of schools is made, particularly with respect to amendments to protect individual rights of students, faculty and staff. With these set laws into place to hold our country

Education is the foundation to secure an individual in having a better future and a successful career in life. Public education primarily falls upon the state and local government to take charge of, which get divided up into local school districts that are managed by school boards. School boards are “ an elected body corporate which manages delegated powers in regards to the deliver of education service within a defined territory (Duhaime’s Law Dictionary)”. Each state “has its own department of education and laws regulating finance, the hiring of school personnel, student attendance, and curriculum (Corsi-Bunker, Antonella).

Education is the key to our future and that is why it is such an important subject in the United States. Education relates to federalism by interacting with the national government, state governments, and local governments. Each level of government is responsible for improving education within their limits of power.

In the United States Constitution the states are dependent on the federal government; however, in the Texas Constitution the counties are inferior to the state government. Both constitutions contain the principles needed for a representative democratic government. For instance, the U.S. Constitution was made to replace the Articles of Confederation, a weak decentralized form of national government with no president and inability to levy taxes. The U.S. Constitution was made to

The state legislature has absolute power to make laws governing education, and pass laws on a variety of issues affecting public schools. State legislatures have the authority to raise revenue and distribute educational funds, control teacher licensure, prescribe curricular offerings, establish pupil performance standards, and regulate other aspects of public school operations. They also create, reorganize, consolidate, and abolish school districts.

Indirectly, or directly, one can argue, public schools are controlled by the federal and state governments. Several issues have emerged, because of the conflict between federal and state requirements for education. “Under the Tenth Amendment, any authority not given specifically to the federal government is reserved to the states. Thus, the federal government has no authority to regulate education directly; that belongs to the states” (Underwood, n. d., p. 2). To get around this, the federal government controls the schools through funds for complying with certain initiatives, procedures, and policies (Underwood, n. d.). Ironically, both the state and federal levels of government hold the district liable for implementing different agendas and legal obligations. The federal government, however, can ensure that no citizen is denied their rights or privileges, even in a private institution, because of the Bill of Rights and other amendments. Failure to comply by these amendments or statutes can lead to the loss of federal funding and legal reproductions for schools.

The Federal government can declare war and can provide an army and navy, while the state can hold elections, and establish schools. That helps guard against tyranny because it doesn't let one government get too much

The U.S.declared independence from England in 1776 because King James lll was abusing power. He was doing this by only making laws that benefit himself, throwing random people in jail to get their land, and other things like that. After we won the war we needed some type of government to run the country. The solution was to create a weak government to prevent from a tyrant. They came up with The Articles of Confederation, which gave all the power to the states. Because the states had all the power, we couldn’t tax, the government had no power over the states, can’t form an army, and the states can decline any law. To fix The Articles of Confederation, 55 people from 12 states came to Pennsylvania in 1787 when they then created The Constitution. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and The Great Compromise.

Britain, after its departure from control of America, left behind residue that shaped, and continues to shape, how the country functions. It is probable that the American government itself would have never made it out of its beginning stages if not for the framework the British government gave them. The idea of a limited government stemmed from the Magna Carta which we know the American government is centered around. The concept of a representative government was also something that Americans adopted from the British. Without the influence of British ideas, it is likely that we would be living in a very different America. The Magna Carta, signed by King John of England, asserted the notion that everyone had to abide by the law including the king/president. This precedent set by the British is something that keeps American government in check even today and also benefits the idea of checks and

National and State governments are organized in similar ways. Both have power derived from the people, three branches of government, checks and balances on political power, individual rights, and federalism. They may seem to have many similarities, but they also have many differences which sets them apart from each other. The Texas Constitution was written to limit the expansion of governmental authority, while the U.S. Constitution was written to act effectively in the public welfare. Over the years, the National government has indeed expanded.

Summarise the roles and responsibilities of national and local government for education policy and practice

Federal government can rule over the laws of state governments by introducing a new policy, which would be implemented nationwide. So, it would make sense for the state government to intervene in the policies made by the local government. If the laws passed by the federal government can be implemented nationwide, regardless of the state’s views on those laws, the laws passed by the state should also be implemented state-wise, regardless of the views of local government. However, I do not believe that local control needs to be influenced by the state government. The local policies are the ones that closely represent what the people want in the local community. For example, the residents of Denton, Texas voted to ban fracking in their local community through a people-led referendum. The people were troubled with toxic fumes, bright lights, and noise due to the fracking sites right in their backyards. The ban on fracking provides what the people of Denton wanted. Local control is also necessary because people in different counties in the same state might have different opinions on the same issue. For example, people of Loving County may encourage fracking as the county is not heavily populated, fracking sites could be constructed far from residential areas, and fracking is a boost in the economy (not much in the

State or federal power? Have one or have both. In the 10th amendment it cites all 50 states have power almost as much as the government. Now, if states didn't have education powers, or rights to even establish the federal court system, and not even get to speak of their needs it would just be federals job to figure that out , Thinking about it, we would be one big state

Gaurav Sharma Professor Sherry Sharifian Texas Government 2306 SLO#3 April 24, 2017 Local Control in Texas In Texas, there are very many functional Interest groups and lobbyists that operate effectively influencing the policy-making processes. The Interest groups and lobbyists are in close association with policy-makers whereby they act as negotiators of democracy to the citizens who cannot reach the legislatures (Texas Vox: 1). This has impacted local control in Texas greatly. However, the nature of laws that have been passed recently in Texas shows that the policy-makers are diverging from interest from the citizens and favoring individual groups and companies. The following essay will address the impact depicted by Interest groups and lobbyists

With regards to approach, a large portion of the general population tends to look to the national government to lead the way, yet the neighborhood governments decide instructive arrangements. Right off the bat in America's history, officials passed the tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which is the reason for making instruction a component of the states. In the states, each school region is directed and financed by the group alongside that area's state government. School areas with higher financial levels tend to give more assets to their schools. Principles and nature of instruction thus change generally from state to state, town to town, and even area to locale.