Locavore Movement Research Paper

Locavores consume only locally grown foods in an effort to reduce their carbon footprints and lose weight, among other reasons. The popularity of locavorism has grown dramatically over the last decade, and its merits are extolled by scientists and ordinary consumers alike. The locavore movement seems to be indisputably beneficial to the environment, the economy, and to consumer health, yet close examination of its common tenets reveals issues which should be taken into account before beginning a locavore diet.

Saving the planet is a topic that is taken seriously by a huge part of this planet’s population. James McWilliams argument, “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying from Nearby Farmer Won’t Save the Planet,” explains why people need to buy food from people other than the local farmers. He believes that the focus of the locavore movement on transportation is wrong because the real problem lies within the energy-hogging factors in food production. McWilliams also went on to explain that another mistake that the locavore movement made was how food miles were calculated. He believes that a truck with 2,000 apples driving 2,000 miles would consume the same amount of fuel as a truck that carried 50 apples to a local shop only 50 miles away. James McWilliams states that “The critical measure here is not food miles but apples per gallon.” He also argues that taking meat out of a person’s diet would cut down on the carbon footprint of his or her dinner because it takes less energy to bring plants, rather than meat, to the table.

The growing locavore movement suggests that local food is key for healthy eating and community growth. One would imagine that the closer the source of one’s food is from, the healthier and more sustainable it is, right? However, this is not the case. In the set of locavore articles, the authors provide information to show that the locavore movement brings about issues involving inefficiency, energy use, and impracticality.

Locavores are consumers of locally grown or produced products. Eating fresh foods from their local farmer’s market can improve income twice as much for its economy. This is important because people give away their money to companies that could instead be giving it to benefit their community. Gogoi Pallavi the author of The Rise of the Locavore states, “It’s a movement that is gradually reshaping the business of growing...local food movement has already accomplished something almost no

The locavore movement is a powerful and extremely healthy movement; it cuts down on transportation, supports a town’s economy, and helps encourage society to consume healthier foods. It is a powerful movement that would be great to the community in many ways. It would not just benefit some people in the community but everybody individually. It is also an amazing way to bring the people in the community together.

Americans today seem to believe that the world should join the locavore movement- when one chooses to primarily eat locally grown or produced products- that has become popular in the past decade. With joining this movement, many people believe their lives and the community will greatly improve. While critics defend that this change in lifestyle has shown very small improvements in the last ten years, supporters of this campaign argue that it benefits the economy, their health, and the environment.

Today, in America, the locavore movement consists of people eating food that is grown or produced locally. This community strives to live a nutritious and environmentally sustainable lifestyle. While some people have the financial resources to go to the farmers market, whole foods, and other grocery stores that sell products produced locally, not everyone does and often these foods that are sold locally cost more than food some one would find in their basic store. The locavore movement is a response to industrialized food production, monocropping, factory farms, and all of the pollution that is being emitted from those food manufacturers. It is unrealistic for America to adopt locavorism; there is an ambiguous definition of locavorism, there

There is a lot of controversy surrounding the use of genetic modification in foods grown for human consumption. Many opponents suggest that genetically modified (GM) foods can affect human growth and development, increase allergic reactions in persons with allergy sensitivity or cause allergies to develop in healthy people. Proponents of using genetically modified organisms to alter and improve foods claim that there are no health risks to humans and that GM foods are subjected to stricter guidelines and testing than “naturally” grown food. They also claim that genetic modification of food is necessary to produce more drought tolerant, insect and disease resistant crops that can sustain the earth’s growing human population. A recent survey conducted suggests that public opinion is evenly divided on whether or not GMOs should be used in foods for human consumption. This paper looks to discuss the pros and cons of GMOs in food and the reported effects, if any, on human growth and development.

A locavore is a character who desires to eat locally to empower a community, in addition, to achieve healthy systems except locavores fail to remember one crucial group, the rest of Earth. Locavores who believe they are improving Earth are actually harming it even greater than before. Furthermore, not only is it harmful to mother Earth, but even the locavores themselves. Locavores assume they decide to eat locally; however, in reality, locavores are forced to eat locally as no choice is available. Understand locavores as well as their local food movements as it is seen superb to every other eye; however, if carefully inspected, it is only an idea that will cause misconduct.

Today’s increasing popularity with becoming a locavore has sky rocketed with the new age of health nuts. The main issue with becoming a locavore is whether the fresh produce is local. However, as part of a group that enjoys the luxury of eating fresh food, becoming a locavore should be the only way of living.

When it comes to the topic of eating locally grown foods, most of us will readily agree that it is beneficial. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether the locavores movement is necessary for a community. Whereas some are convinced that the locavore movement holds more cons, others maintain that the pros heavily outweigh the cons. Although the movement may come across some troubling difficulties, the locavore movement has many positive implications on the community.

The locavore movement can provide more the local economy. A study conducted by the New Economics Foundation provided the results of how the local economy is benefited by eating locally. A dollar that would be spent locally will generate twice as much income for the local economy (Source A). Along with the benefits to the local economy, the ways food miles are calculated are flawed. If you were to ship 2,000 apples 2,000 miles, it would calculate to be the same as a shipment of 50 apples 50 miles. The locavore movement focuses on miles traveled rather than the apples per gallon that are being transported (Source C).

Every Tuesday, of every summer a local foods market pops up in Thiensville, Wisconsin just a ten minute drive away. Every week my friends and I go at lunchtime to eat food grown on local farms. Fruits and vegetables of every color and every flavor. Juices and tea made from local herbs. Even an ice cream truck made with local dairy products. The locavore movement in all it’s glory. I am proud to be a proponent of a movement that has gained so much popularity in past years. Although locavore practices have proven to be difficult to maintain and unpredictable in production, the widely popular movement has incited change resulting in healthier eating practices along with profitable advancements for the local economy.

As for the locavores positive impacts on the community a deeper look into the large scale effects of the movement will reveal that there are deep negative to coincide with these local benefits. With it is stated that the locavore movement can help the local economy it is not mentioned if this is and needed support. Although it can be viewed that any benefit to the community is a good one, there is nothing to suggest that the local community, in most cases, would be crippled by the removal of the locavore movement. The facts are that in most situation a local economy is stimulated from business and unless in specific rural locations the business is not driven by local farming. There is data to suggest, however, that the locavore movement has much more than a local impact but an impact that extends not just to a community, not just to a local consumer, not just to a local farmer, but to a world wide plane.

Within the past few years, the locavore movement has been steadily growing as more people choose to eat only locally grown and produced foods. Their reasons for doing so stem from a number of causes. Some believe that locally grown food tastes better and fresher, leading to more nutrition. Eating locally is also thought to better for the environment due to less transportation and pollution. Still others believe that the movement benefits the local economy. Together, these three aspects lead some communities to organize locavore movements. Despite the advantages, however, the locavore movement’s economic and environmental aspects prove that communities are better off without shifting towards only eating locally.