Locavores Research Paper

Locavorism has both strong supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn’t a bad idea: it can connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However — as with all topics — it isn’t all black and white. Many common locavorism arguments aren’t grounded in science, and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering locavorism should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Saving the planet is a topic that is taken seriously by a huge part of this planet’s population. James McWilliams argument, “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying from Nearby Farmer Won’t Save the Planet,” explains why people need to buy food from people other than the local farmers. He believes that the focus of the locavore movement on transportation is wrong because the real problem lies within the energy-hogging factors in food production. McWilliams also went on to explain that another mistake that the locavore movement made was how food miles were calculated. He believes that a truck with 2,000 apples driving 2,000 miles would consume the same amount of fuel as a truck that carried 50 apples to a local shop only 50 miles away. James McWilliams states that “The critical measure here is not food miles but apples per gallon.” He also argues that taking meat out of a person’s diet would cut down on the carbon footprint of his or her dinner because it takes less energy to bring plants, rather than meat, to the table.

The Omnivore’s Dilemma, written by Michael Pollan, gives light to the question, “What should we have for dinner?” that he thinks Americans today cannot answer simply due to the fact that there are too many food options. This book serves as an eye-opener to challenge readers to be more aware and accountable of what is consumed daily. In order to understand fully where our food comes from, we must follow it back to the very beginning. Pollan goes on to discuss three different modern food chains in which we get our food: the industrial, the organic, and the hunter-gatherer. By tracing our food back to the beginning, we can understand that most of the nutritional and health problems America is going through today can be found on the farms that make our food and the government that can decide what happens. America deals with many food related illness such as, heart disease, obesity, and type II diabetes. Majority of a human and animals diet consists of being corn-fed leading to a high cause of obesity in the United States these are just some of the many diseases that come with over processed foods and diets we are unaware of. In this study, we will highlight the environmental and health issues and impacts related with modern agriculture and how these systems can be made more sustainable.

Michael Pollan the author of Omnivore 's Dilemma discusses and asks, “what should we have for dinner?” He attempts to answer one of the pressing questions of sustainability in today 's society, to save money or to save the planet, and how? Pollan talks about how humans are omnivores and we have the choice to eat whatever we want, no matter the health and sustainability implications of our decisions. Pollan discusses three main food chains, industrial (corn), organic, and hunter/gatherer. He analyzes each food chain, learning eating industrial is basically eating corn, and goes into the complex issues

Many people are not sure whether the locavore movement is the right route to take, however, Americans are not aware of the positive things it brings to its community. The taste and quality of their produce will improve, along with nutritional factors. Making

What am I exactly eating? Where does our food come from? Why should I care? “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” may forever change the way you think about food. I enjoyed Mr. Pollan’s book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” and learned a great deal of information. Pollan’s book is a plea for us to stop and think for a moment about our whole process of eating. Pollan sets out to corn fields and natural farms, goes hunting and foraging, all in the name of coming to terms with where food really comes from in modern America and what the ramifications are for the eaters, the eaten, the economy and the environment. The results are far more than I expected them to be.

 Local farming is healthier than eating processed foods.  Organic foods have more nutrients in the food than processed foods. The author says, "A regular trip to a farmer's market is one of the best ways to connect with where your food comes from. Meeting and talking to farmers and food artisans is a great opportunity to learn more about how and where food is produced." The author also says, "Buying from the local farmer helps safeguard your health. Knowing where your food comes from and how it is grown enables you to choose safe food. Buy food from local farmers you trust. The farmer then circulates his profits throughout the community with local merchants creating a cycle that helps to build a strong local economy." This means that local farming is better than processed foods and people just care about their health and how they can stay healthy.

Michael Pollan, in his book The Omnivore’s Dilemma, advocates for organic, locally grown foods. He contends that processed foods, unlike organic foods, are

In Catacalos’ and Janzen’s article, “Suburban Foraging: Two Families Eat Only Local” they acknowledge what feelings can come from choosing to eat strictly locally for one month, while simultaneously answering their own questions about consuming food within a modest radius (117).

This information has swayed me to understand that organic food is the much better option when considering our natural well being and the environments. Likewise, Mr. Pollan has educated the audience enough to know that “free-range” or “organic” foods do not always mean what their are connotation may make them out to be. Organic foods may include no pesticides or chemical fertilizers, but what about all of the other chemicals that animals must inhale to keep from getting sick. As Michael Pollan puts it “When chickens get to live like chickens, they'll taste like chickens, too.” (Pollan 270.) This quote directly correlates with humans as well. When we eat processed foods or anything that does not stem from the environment that we live in we are changing our bodies into something it was unintended to be. Likewise arose the quote by Victor Lindlahr “You are what you

The locavore movement has become a much larger cause in recent years.  People are increasingly aware of some of the issues pertaining to eating foods grown far away.  These issues have banded some communities together to sacrifice their favorite foods and to begin buying locally grown foods.  These communities are experiencing numerous benefits as a result of their decision to change their culture and eat locally grown foods.

The locavore movement emphasizes that people should only consume locally grown or produced products. This movement would have a positive effect on the people and on the planet according to several sources.

A locavore is a character who desires to eat locally to empower a community, in addition, to achieve healthy systems except locavores fail to remember one crucial group, the rest of Earth. Locavores who believe they are improving Earth are actually harming it even greater than before. Furthermore, not only is it harmful to mother Earth, but even the locavores themselves. Locavores assume they decide to eat locally; however, in reality, locavores are forced to eat locally as no choice is available. Understand locavores as well as their local food movements as it is seen superb to every other eye; however, if carefully inspected, it is only an idea that will cause misconduct.

When it comes to the topic of eating locally grown foods, most of us will readily agree that it is beneficial. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether the locavores movement is necessary for a community. Whereas some are convinced that the locavore movement holds more cons, others maintain that the pros heavily outweigh the cons. Although the movement may come across some troubling difficulties, the locavore movement has many positive implications on the community.

Although some people may argue that being Locavore is not beneficial since they are expensive, I believe it has been clever because eating local is better for air quality and pollution, it protects us from bio-terrorism, and locally grown produce is fresher.