Loch Ness Monster Eyewitness

Eyewitness evidence has always been considering critical information when it comes to court trials and convictions. But how reliable are eyewitnesses? Scientific research has shown that eyewitness’s memories are often not accurate or reliable. Human memory is very malleable and is easily changed by suggestion. Relying on eyewitness evidence instead of scientific data often leads to wrongful convictions. Scientific evidence is much more reliable, and should be more important in court cases than eyewitness evidence.

For over a 150 years man has been troubled by one great mystery, a mystery that has baffled all who have witnessed it and all who have tried to solve it. This mystery is commonly known as Bigfoot, a tall hairy man/ape who lurks in the woods in almost every country on this planet. Some say it is just an ape, some believe it is a man in costume, and others are true believers of this hairy phenomenon. For more than a decade and a half this creature of myth has caused enormous contradictions in the field of science, bringing about one question. Does Bigfoot exist?

"There is proof that the manatees were around for about 60 million years and that they were related to the elephant. It was also learned that they were land animals and that over time they learned to survive in the water".

Many times we have been in a dilemma whether to believe or not someone who tries to persuade us for something and very often by listening his arguments and by having enough evidence we finally manage to get out of the dilemma. Nevertheless sometimes we cannot be sure about an event because although there is enough evidence, our minds cannot be persuaded. An example to justify that is the existence of the Loch Ness monster, or as it is widely known “Nessie”.

Bigfoot (or “Sasquatch”) is a tall, dark haired cryptid humanoid that has become a mystery to the American people. Unfortunately, many believe that the furry beast is simply a hoax, while others know what they saw in the mysterious forest. Based on countless discoveries, Bigfoot has existed at some point. Considering the proof presented by dedicated Bigfoot scientists and fans, totally debunking the controversial topic of Bigfoot would seem ignorant. Perhaps people are not digging deep enough to find the creature.

says the loch ness monster has been around for many years. most accounts of the Loch Ness have

There have been several similar situations like this in the past. For example we have witnessed how the yeti, bigfoot, and other varieties of so called mythical creatures. The public may be able to just simply write these so called mythical beliefs off but the people that were the eyewitnesses can not do this. People have collaborated with professionals to try and make sense of what they have claimed to see. Nearly every witness has some form of proof for dogman in 2006 a man in Troy, Michigan allegedly contacted onstar, a security system for cars, after running his car off of the road. He supposedly swerved to avoid hitting an animal in the middle of the road. He claimed that this animal was a great big dog that ran in front of him. Another man claims that Dogman scratched his thigh when he was trying to run past him. To this date there have been no reports of any injuries or deaths from the dogman. Although none of them are confirmed, there are many people that go missing in Michigan forests each and every year.

Most have asked if such a creature or monster could possibly be roaming through the wilderness of North America and around the world, and the answer is yes. The amount of evidence supporting such

Grover Krantz, admits that’s the height of the creature is within human size but the chest is too large to be human like. He quoted “ I can confidently state that no man of that stature is built that broadly.” Eventually they got a second opinion by David Daegling and Daniel Schmitt, they are anthropologists. They both claimed that the chest was “impossibly wide” for a humans body and also said that the creature walks in a manner impossible for a person to duplicate. Many people say they don't believe in Bigfoot because there is a lot of fake videos and pictures, but people tend to ignore the scientific evidence that is given to the world about him.

To many, seeing is truly believing, to others they go with their gut feeling that something is true or false. A certain skepticism takes place when a person cannot think something is real merely because there’s nothing tangible to it yet. Another saying goes that the things you can’t see hurt you the most. Just because you cannot see it doesn’t mean it is not there. Many people across the world have seen a magnificent creature roaming in the wild. Sasquatch. This creature is the missing link of evolution and is roaming around the backwoods of America, the mountainsides of the Himalaya, and everywhere in-between. With videos, plastic cast, eyewitness accounts, dna, and logical theories, it all proves the existence of the Bigfoot.

The Claim: The "weird" claim is that there is a population of large hairy "ape men" (a non-human missing link) that grow to be up to seven and a half feet tall that are known as Bigfoot or Sasquatch that live in the Northwest part of the United States. Bigfoot is a previously undiscovered creature that inhabits the Pacific Northwest of the United States and other various mountainous areas around the world but has never been conclusively proven to exist. My contention is that there is no such thing as Bigfoot and that there is no credible evidence for the existence of Bigfoot, furthermore I intend to show that the existence of Bigfoot is not the best explanation for what people may think

It was four feet in length and first they thought it might be a crocodile. Nevertheless, over the next year, at the tender age of 12, Mary painstakingly uncovered the rest of it, to discover a giant marine reptile called the 'ichthyosaurus'.

The Loch ness monster myth has been around for a very long time. Deep down in the depths of Loch Ness Lake, this monster has been averting capture and clear documentation from humans for over 80 years. Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it? This myth is a lot like the legend of Bigfoot. Although some may believe in the existence of Bigfoot, Bigfoot is not real because there is a lack of evidence, other theories, and it overall just isn’t logical. Therefore, Bigfoot is fake.

One thing that stands out to me is that there isn’t any clear video or photographic evidence to prove Bigfoot is real. In the pieces of “evidence” there is almost always tree branches in the way or the creature is extremely far away. Also the person filming or capturing the image doesn’t try to chase the beast or try to get a clearer image of the suspected Bigfoot. I don’t think an unclear shot from an extreme distance is very convincing,

Would you have ever believed in your entire life there could be one animal made out of 4 animals combined? Well there is and it is called the platypus. It has the bill of a duck, the tail of a beaver, webbed feet also like a duck, and the body and fur of an otter. This species has an amazing food and nutrition balance, habitat, and many interesting other facts.