An evaluation of Lonrho’s corporate strategy should start from the two main key issues: in what businesses the firm should compete and how corporate headquarter should manage those businesses.
Lonrho’s profile in 1996 included Agriculture, Sugar, General Trade, Hotels, Manufacturing, Mining&Refining and Motor&Equipment. The level of diversification was clearly high and the firm was pursuing a unrelated strategy, with less than 70% of revenues that came from the dominant business (Mining ) and without common links between businesses.
The corporation was divided into country groups or related business lines and each division had a top manager whose responsibilities were similar to those of a group CEO. So the headquarter control of these
…show more content…
Nevertheless I do not think that this corporate strategy is the best. This strategy is mainly concerned with making choices among the last two alternatives. So the corporation would be constrained to relinquish the enormous promise of African continent, or the 41% of mining profit if it chooses to focus in Lonrho Africa. ii) The firm can continue as a conglomerate but for the reason said above, also in this case Lonrho should leave the sugar market. Now we have two businesses left and I would like to make a comparison with the Boston Consulting Group chart. With this corporate strategy, the firm could use mining as a “cash cow” market, trying to exploit the high percentage of the revenues that comes from the asset. Than it can use this cash flow in Lonrho Africa, a proper “star” market, with its enormous promise but also with a lot of investments needed. So with its management expertise, technical skills and a respected name, mixed with new financial resources, Lonrho could undertake some projects in Africa that few other firms could. I think that these are the right actions that the firm should take in term of corporate
My recommendation is for the company to stay focused on its main competitive advantage of supplying a
How was Loewen group able to grow explosively for the first half of the 1990s? What were the advantages of debt financing enjoyed by the company in this phase?
People – Culture – Autonomous Business groups: Cushy Armchair’s current organizational structure is decentralized and running by fully autonomous business groups in 17 countries. That means there are 17 managements independently working, or more likely 17 sub-organizations driving in CA and looks like there are two bosses. This is described in Marth’s book as, Matrix organization, a structure in
To be successful, some gaps need to be addressed. The question to be asked is the strategy successful to help the company differentiate from the competition.
This structure is unlike that of the Philips where locals, within the national organizations, held senior management positions. Basically, the structure gave some leeway to product control but still kept the same global image of Matsushita. As times/cultures changed, the strategy that existed with Matsushita during the early years proved to be the foundation of a successful company.
The current strategy of the company is to enter foreign markets and to succeed there. The corporate main strategy is to provide high quality product to its customers.
Individual structure would be broken down by the smaller teams that make up one of the functional areas of the company. For example, under the property and casualty division, there directors that have smaller teams that consist of one manager and approximately thirteen employees. The directors in each functional area can range from three to five. The managers on said teams then report to the director and the director then reports to the functional director and so on in the chain, where the info is rolled up and eventually reported to the CEO, in this case Stuart Parker.
The best way to evaluate a company 's corporate strategy is by performing an analysis of the
The organization has a tall structure with many hierarchical levels, resembling a system with a vertical functional design. There is a fairly narrow span of management with most important decisions being by either the board of trustees or the CEO. See Figure A in Appendix
Strategy formulation has been acknowledged as one of the most crucial factors of ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, the manner in which strategy is formulated, and most importantly, the nature of the strategy chosen for the company determines its future position in the marketplace (Grant, 2005).
Managers who represent key operations of each business segments or specialized functional operations are assembled in the Group Operating Committee. The prime duty of the Committee is to oversee and coordinate domestic and international companies related to each of the segments. However, all of the companies are responsible for their own strategic plans and day-to-day operations. Because of the principles of decentralization, international companies are managed in most cases by local managers, who are citizens of the country in question. (J&J)
Furthermore, the paper will identify 3 HRM issues related to strategy implementation and recommend actions to address these issues. Recommendation whether a related or unrelated diversification should be used will also be discussed. Finally, we will be looking at Organizational structure issues the company
Since its establishment, Tata has shown a strategy of incremental change. Arguably, that point was important because so the group might vary within the current market. In the nineteenth – century steel was seen as an unprofitable section. Even more than 50 independent steel producers went into bankruptcy in the USA (Business Monitor International Ltd, 2010: 54).