Looking back, I can clearly remember the moment where I fell in love with murder mysteries. I can

Peter Jackson’s 2009 film, The Lovely Bones, is based off of the New York Times bestseller novel written by Alice Sebold. Both the book and the movie adaptation tell the story of a young, 14-year-old girl named Susie Salmon who is brutally murdered by her neighbor. In both versions, Susie narrates her story from the place between Heaven and Earth, the “in-between,” showing the lives of her family and friends and how each of their lives have changed since her murder. However, the film adaptation and the original novel differ in the sense of the main character focalization throughout, the graphic explanatory to visual extent, and the relationship between the mother and father.

“Heaven is comfort, but it's still not living.” -Alice Sebold. Alice Sebold the author of Lovely Bones creates a story of depression, guilt, and grief with the murder of Susie Salmons. In Lovely Bones the death of Susie affects all those close to her, like her mother, her father and her classmates. Her father grieves with despair as the murderer has yet to be caught. Her mother can not handle her disappearance and finds unnerving ways to cope. Susie’s classmates, Ruth and Ray both find ways to cope with each other and through other connections with Susie. A death of a loved young one is one no one is ever ready for. The grief starts and people find ways to feel guilty. If no mental aid is present the associates will

The book tells the same story as the movie but in a different way it cuts out thing the movies has or the movies adds thing that's not in the book. The book has some not many similar but . I feel the director was unfaithful to the book.The book and movie version of Our America had many differences.

The play version of The Crucible is a lot more what is seen in this play. The play is good and could arguably be better than the movie. The movie version of The Crucible shows exactly how the actors portray the characters by how they spoke and acted. The movie was a success when it was released in 1996. The actors in the movie are very skilled and play their characters great.

Thirdly, the story’s foundation and the setting were really similar in the book and movie. The time setting was Pencey Prep School and New York City in either 1948 or 1949. It was odd to see that some of the scenarios mentioned in the book were missing from the movie. For example, in the movie, there wasn’t a scene about Holden trying to hit Stradlater, which is an important moment in the book. This scene expressed the feeling that he had for Stradlater and how much Holden cared for Jane. Another part that seemed very odd was that at the beginning of the movie, it started with Holden getting kicked out of the school without any description showed. On the other hand, the book start with full of details about Holden’s school and his personality. The movie did not contain the depth that the book

The movie was like the movie in multiple ways. For starters, a lot of the dialogue in the scenes were exactly like they were written in the book. Like when Atticus talks Scout about school and why she has to go. In addition, the scene at the jailhouse was the same as in the book. The confrontation happened that was luckily ended by the children. Mr. Cunningham was pulled into the confrontation just like in the book. Although there were many similarities, there were also differences.

Throughout the book the Angel kids investigate who might have killed their parents, as the book goes on, more and more problems start to unravel making the reader's question who really did kill their parents. Another conflict that happens later on in the book is that Matthew's (one of the Angel children) girlfriend Tamara Gee, gets murdered. Some believe Matthew did it to get revenge on her for certain reasons that you will find out later in the book, because of this, the police

One example of how the movie's plot differentiates from the book is what it overall focuses on. The movie is mainly focused on Mia and Adam's relationship. Throughout the majority of the movie, there are periodical flashbacks that really show and capture the intensity of their relationship, which made the it seem like the whole story was just another romance movie, but it's so much more than that. In the book, Forman focuses on Mia's love for her family, for her

I was keen to know what happened after watching the movie of the first book as it leaves the viewer wondering what’s going to happen next. It was interesting to me that the movie had some differences to the book with regards to some of the details for example in the movie Adams parents were not in his life but in the book both his parents were there.

What I really adore about the film is that the characters seem to represent the real people awfully well. I don't know how the real people acted, but the characters pulled off the whole "coy and southern" act. I love the how the southern culture was shown and how the movie scenes showed the green land, It reminded me of when I moved to Arkansas and how everything was different from New York. I made a connection to the Loving's when they moved to a totally different area. My situation was less drastic than theirs, but I could relate to the feeling of moving away from all your family and friends and not knowing when you will see them again. That is why I understood why they secretly moved back there and started a new life in hiding, even though it had me on the edge of my sit. Both the characters were relatable on the way the feel about the situation. Richard was very paranoid of other people and was more cautious. That seems like a splendid idea, but Mildred was right about wanting them to get more publicity, so their story could be shared with other

The book puts more emphasis on Delores and Billy, while the movie puts more emphasis on Stephens and Nichole. As well as, the book portrays a very different theme than the movie. All that being said, the movie was an excellent take on the book. Banks himself states in an interview with Washington Post, “I think the film is faithful to the tone and atmosphere of the novel, and also, to its moral perspective and themes. It, however, had to be completely restructured in order to make it adaptable to film, because the novel is told from four different points of view, and if the structure of the novel had been followed, the film would have felt like four separate films.

I saw to many missing information from the book that was in the movie. One of the things were that the reporter used a recorder while interviewing the Delany sisters, because Bessie told her if the information they going to give will be word by word. Also, they didn’t mention nearly anything from Saint Augustine that I was thinking at the beginning of the movie. I thought “I will be going to see how Saint Augustine looks like” but I didn’t. the thing that impacted me the most was that when Sadie wanted to have a boyfriend she was very excited and it look that she was happy about it. In book it was mention how she has a friend but her father didn’t let her see him anymore after knowing he was involved in problem with nurse girl. At the end of the movie people made a play of Delany sisters which also it wasn’t mention in the book. The rest of the movie they did cover for example: how Bessie didn’t trust white people, their father’s words, they consider themselves Americans not White African America like many

Now I will share some similarities between the movie and the novel. At the begging of the novel Ella and char are basically want nothing to do with each other, especially Ella. In the movie it’s the same. Also the movie and the novel have mostly all the characters Ella Char, Hattie, Olive, Dame, Mandy, and Lucinda. Secondly

Thirdly, the movie has the some main characters as the book. The main characters are Hazel Grace Lancaster, Augustus Waters, her parents and Dr. Maria were the actual main characters. Also, Isaac, Augustus’ best friend, and last but not least Peter Van Houten. These two were not main characters but I feel like they are important characters. I was very pleased to see these characters in the movie. Although these characters were not even close to looking half like I pictured them.

Though there were differences in the detail that Suzanne Collins and the director of the movie went into, both the plots of the movie and the book are complete and thorough. They both provide the audience with enough background in order for us to understand the districts, the oppression of the Capital, and the