Los Angeles Adaptive Reuse Ordinance: A Case Study

Case Study 1: Co-Housing at Phoenix Common, Designer, City, State, Country, Year Completed Case Study 1: Aging in Place at Phoenix Commons, Architect: Jeff Zimmerman? Zimmerman, Oakland, California, USA, completed? ( the building with or without permits OK In answer to your question; Aging in place is a good term for this case study. It goes with the chapter theme. Case Study: Phoenix Commons Co-Housing Community, USA Phoenix Commons, a LEED certified co-housing building was designed by Jeff Zimmerman, architect or name of firm. Located in the Jingletown Arts District area in Oakland,

The Oregon Historical District is a twelve city block area in Dayton, Ohio that is registered with the National Register of Historic Places. This reasonably small area has both commercial and residential land uses. Though mixed use space, commercial and residential, is seen as a modern phenomenon, this area of land is quite old for an American city with the original plat recording in 1829. However, the homes in the area developed over a period of 100 years which allowed for them to development with different architectural features with the most common being Classic Revival. This different architectural development could also be seen throughout the business district. Intriguing ideas held within the historic value of the Oregon Historical District are the ideas of preservation and protection. Instead of requiring its residents to rehabilitate the homes to original status the requirements are that the home look authentic and have the appeal of authenticity. The aesthetic nature of the homes should be less museum-like and more home-like with the intention of preserving the architectural character of the past.

The lack of fire suppression in the buildings hampers property owners from being able to rent the commercial spaces on the first floor. If the use changes code

All across the US, cities are constantly evolving by tearing down outdated buildings and erecting new structures in their places that serve to grow and improve the community as a whole. However, when a city either does not have the funds or the communal support to tear down a run-down building, this evolutionary process is halted. In nature, organisms must adapt to keep up with their ever-changing environments. This same concept goes for communities that wish to keep up with the increased modernization we are seeing across the country. When worn down structures are allowed existence, they hurt the community in many ways

The article by Denise Lawrece-Zuniga (2010) focused on preservationist and the experiences of preservationists living in Los Angeles. The author conducted interviews and participant observation five different cities across Los Angeles. Preservation can be defined as maintenance of property without significant alteration to its current condition, the more original features the home possesses the better it is (Lawrence-Zuniga 2010). Preservationist claimed their goal to save history from destruction of modernity or neglect. In theory, preservations cosmology is available to all residents of historic neighborhoods, but it privileges those possessing cultural capital (education, class, economy) to do so. One concerns that preservation cosmology

Mary Madden and Joel Russel in their article “Part 1: What Is a Form-Based Code?” talk about renewing communities’ zoning ordinates and different ways of their achievement. A form-based code (FBC) is a way to control building form and use, with the purpose of accomplishing an appropriate built environment. Zoning itself was created as a result of the Industrial Revolution. During the 20th century, people started separating cities and towns into zones. There are different parameters and requirements which influence building forms such as “dwelling units per acre” and “floor area ratios”. However, the authors remark that such regulations are too broad, they do not specify the height of the building or how it will relate to the street and other

Jane Jacobs was an outstanding advocate for the urban ecologies of our American cities she shared her to me heart felt and timely views on urban zoning, mixed or best use, citizen participation and deeper involvement in public planning policies. Jane Jacobs also illustrated important insights concerning humanistic or people planning and design for cities use, or shall I say a better use of public resources and public transportation. Ms .Jacobs was also in favor of positive growth and development in the urban economy and economies of cities in these United States.

Almost three-fourths of New York City’s greenhouse gas emissions come from heating, cooling and powering buildings, making buildings more energy efficient is installation of well insulated exterior walls that reduce heating and cooling demands, lowering home heating and air conditioning bills and potentially reduce energy consumption. The policy will allow existing buildings to add external insulation within the property line, while exempting it from floor area calculations and yard and open space regulations. The floor area of a building is the sum of the gross area of each floor of the building, excluding mechanical space, cellar space, floor space in open balconies, elevators or stair bulkheads and, in most zoning districts, floor space

When trying to trigger a memory people often look at something that will remind them. Many historical moments are linked to buildings, Mount Vernon, and Monticello are a few that quickly come to mind. The link between a visual representation and how they create or change the memories connected to them is an important one to think on and protect. This is where the creation of historical preservation is created. Preservation protects a building from demolition and also allows them to not conform to certain building codes if they would damage the historical value of the building. This is determined by a series of tests, research and forms done in accordance with the National Preservation Act of 1966 (Wallace, 191).

During time, historic cities kept transforming, meanwhile it conserves its identity and fulfilling the society ongoing requirements. (Halbwachs, 1950) people change and transform their built environment gradually to suit their needs, without affecting their mental map. The gradual transformation is presented in the frame of the familiar environment which maintains the sense of stability and continuity. Without change or brake its familiarity or affect their memory (Meusburger, 2011).

This paper will attempt to argue why the act of preserving and restoring historic structures is a much better option than demolishing them. The essay will use the powerful tool of reliable and relevant sources to support the essay’s claim about historic restoration. In addition, this argument will present the opposition’s claims and why they may or may not be correct in the process of improving a historic structure. The essay will separate the ideological differences between demolishing structures and restoring them. Initially, this paper will introduce the main underlying problem with the opposing argument. Then, the paper will establish two main points as to why the restoring of these historic structures is a much better option.

Understanding building use, what determines the occupancy classification per the fire code, and the dangers

A key issue that arises from this is the idea of Preservation vs Modernisation. Preservation is a key aspect in keeping a national identity but this should not hold back the evolution of a country. Sentimentality should not take centre stage and preservation should only be acknowledged if the architecture can fulfil the function of the modern world. There would seem to be a fine line between national identity and modern evolution of a country.

In the Ted Talk “How Painting Can Transform Communities,” Haas and Hahn discuss the significant impact art can have on deteriorating cities. First, about ten years ago, they had the idea of painting houses to create an image and to improve the sense of community in declining cities. The duo were introduced to the right people, and their dream came to life in Vila Cruzeiro. Haas and Hahn hired some workers to create an image -- a boy flying a kite -- on three vapid houses in the middle of the community. This turned out to be a success, and they received some publicity from the local news. Motivating from their recent success, Haas and Hahn decided to return to Rio for a second project. They covered the concrete with a Japanese-styled river.

People’s daily life sacrifices the convenience to maintain the city’s history. In “Whose Culture? Whose City?” sociologist Sharon Zukin suggested that “Gentrification, historic preservation, and other cultural strategies to enhance the visual appeal of urban spaces developed as major trends”. For example, the historical and classic buildings in Paris are one of main reasons that people love about the Paris. Most of buildings are hundreds years old at least and they have their own