Loss of Military Sensitive Items Essay

A military Brat turns 18, and unless you enlist or marry military, your ID card is gone. They take away your identity. You are left stranded, and unable to access all of the places you grew up knowing. As you learn to make your way thru your new life, you start

In fact, security of goods in the cargo supply chain is also significant, especially consumable goods such as pharmaceuticals. This kind of goods could prove catastrophic, result in substantial loss of both financial and life.

Pauline Boss word of ambiguous loss is a term when a child doesn’t have closure or doesn’t have an open or end to grief. It can very apparent when a parent is in the military. A child can feel grief. Not knowing when their parent is going to return or if they will return (Konrad, pg. 241)

“The Things They Carried” is a story based on the soldiers’ experiences in the Vietnam War and their experiences after the war. The story begins with a character named Jimmy Cross, who is the Lieutenant of the Alpha Company. Jimmy Cross carries letters from a girl named Martha, who he dated before he joined the army. He also carries her good luck pebble in his mouth. The narrator later describes items the other soldiers in the Company are carrying. Some of the items were insect repellant, knives, and chewing gum. The items the soldiers had carried were based on their priorities. For instance, Henry Dobbins carried his girlfriend panty hose since he was superstitious. Ted Lavender carried tranquilizer pills to keep himself calm and Kiowa carried the New Testament to show his religious beliefs. The items that they carried were also based by their rank and what they specialized in. For example, Lieutenant Cross carried maps and the lives of the soldiers, due to his rank. Rat Kiley carried supplies for serious wounds, malaria tablets, and morphine since he was the medic.

and liberties are in jeopardy. There are threats that come from all around whether it be local or worldwide it should be our right to bear arms against terrors that we might encounter. The military defends us against worldly terrors, however if the military and other defense forces were the only ones who had the right to bear arms what kind of protection will that leave? There is not enough cops in the United States to protect every individual from the crime that happens in their city. For example, if guns are to restricted to the point of being banned safety would become a concern. Cops can only be in so many places at once, when people do not have the opportunity to protect themselves the criminals will see these as opportune targets. “In Connecticut (1643) and at least five other colonies, required "at least one adult man in every house to carry a gun to church or other public meetings" in order to protect against attacks by Native Americans; prevent theft of firearms from unattended homes” (Procons

For as long as I can remember Identifications have been used to show, and verify one’s identity, whether it is to buy a small box of cigarettes or get into a place, we must show and prove who are. There is really no excuse to not have an identification for something more important like voting.

One of those items is poisonous gas which I think is one of the most important weapons we have. Some think that it’s not as beneficial as weapons such as machine guns but it does a lot of damage. Poisonous gas is an inexpensive weapon that can create mass destruction from a distance. It can take down our enemies all at once in large numbers. Another thing that I find useful and reliable is my rifle. Every soldier here carries one at all times. Rifles have a sharp blade at the end called a bayonet. Most of the time I use the bayonet to scrape the mud off my boots and open tin cans. Rifles are more useful than you’d

The applicant requests an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to general, under honorable conditions. The applicant states, in effect, his initial background check that was conducted prior to his enlistment is free of infractions that involve substance abuse. The applicant contends, his first incident of substance abuse was in Baghdad, Iraq. The applicant states, he dealt with the identification of remains during his deployment, and he started to have issues with the things he had witnessed. The applicant contends, he never handled the remains of American Soldiers but he had handled the remains of multiple Iraqi Police Officers and civilians who had been killed. The applicant contends, his first and only time he huffed canned air was when he was caught. The applicant states, he made some bad choices, he has been sober for

The possession of guns allows people to feel more comfortable and secure. Many real-life instances have proven that guns usually just help people calm their mind, not act violently. In a New York Times article titled “Why This Professor is Armed,” a professor shares an anecdote of a time that there was a strange man who looked like a burglar outside of his house. When he saw the man, the professor’s “first instinct was to grab a gun,” then call the police. He did not have his gun because he wanted to shoot somebody, but “as a last resort” so he could defend himself if necessary. After the encounter, the professor admitted he may never actually need to use his gun, and says that “We are a planning species,” comparing having a gun to buying fire insurance because “most of us will never need it,” but “It’s what feels rational.” People are left defenseless and unable to feel a real sense of security in their own homes if they cannot get access to weapons. Owning guns gives people a sense of security

As the U.S. Army completes its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the transition from a combat military force to a peacetime role means that the importance of stockpiles of supplies and soldiers in the management pipeline will have to be reevaluated in light of the organization's changing mission. In the past, the U.S. Army has dealt with the transition from combat to garrison through discharges of unessential personnel and the sale of surplus material through commercial bidding. During the brief period following the end of World War II but

First, let’s look at a sampling of events that many people perform on a daily basis that do require a photo ID. Many state or federal licenses such as marriage, driving, hunting, and fishing need proper identification to be obtained. If you are planning to rent or purchase a home or vehicle, you must have a photo ID. During travel, identification must be presented to board an airplane or rent a hotel room. Many purchases such as: firearms, alcohol, tobacco, and even certain cold medications require identification. Applications for many government programs like food stamps, welfare, Medicaid, and Social Security must be accompanied with a

World war II revolutionized the way of fighting and pioneered new frontiers for uses of future weapons. Although the great tragedy that came along with World War II many weapon advancements opened a door to more technologically advanced weapons that are still being used today because the weapons were more accurate, safe to operate, they were more accurate, safe to operate, they were more powerful and precise for their time. Many of the the biggest advancements and building platforms of warfare technologies showed up in the beginning of WWII and served as templates for later weapons manufactures. During the beginning of the war tanks were big, slow, chunky and clumsy that didn't do much fight but they did provide cover for the infantry (Weapons

Another position that gun advocates support is self-protection. They claim that everyone having guns would be safer because there are many bad people who own guns, and because the bad people do not obey laws anyway, so they always will own guns. The only way to avoid being a victim is that you either carry one on you or have one at home so that you might fight off an intruder. Although protection from bodily harm is a basic good, it remains to be proved whether owning a firearm for personal safety as a concealed weapon or in one’s home is actually safer. Given that there are many safety issues at stake, it would seem that the risk does not justify the reward. Unless one is an individual who encounters, reacts, and is trained to deal with dangerous situations involving firearms on a very regular basis, that the possession of a concealed weapon will not enhance personal safety. In a society of armed individuals, the potential for erratic and irrational action is far greater. The individual may feel empowered, but this is because of the fact that they have a gun. Because of this then the possession of a concealed weapon actually may impair personal safety because it creates a false sense of security because the overwhelming number of people who own guns do not regularly use their guns and there is a possibility for collateral accidental shootings among bystanders. Under gun control the

“The bigger the tank, the bigger the stopping power”-said Adolf Hitler. Tanks were the main armored vehicle of World War 2 because they were effective on the battlefield and easy to build.Tanks played a major role in the war and could be found in almost all of the battles.Tanks in World War 2 were made better to devastate their opponent both physically and mentally, but they weren’t without flaws.

Ever wonder where you would be today if World War II had gone differently? Well there were many weapons, termed superweapons, that could have caused it to end very differently if they had made it into general use. There were many superweapons built in world war two, and unless you are a WWII enthusiast (like me), you probably haven’t heard of many of them, and some of them might surprise you with the identity of their parent nation.