Loss of the Creature Outside Analysis Essay

Chapter two in a nutshell says, your success depends on your party’s organization and membership. It is mentioned on page 35, that the majority of people are represented by a small percentage of people because it is only that small group whose opinion and beliefs are taken into consideration. It stresses the connection between political involvements depending on your level of education. People with college degrees

The author, V. O. Key, states the results of a survey that shows that voters tend to vote for people who vote for candidates that will help them financially. He also states that people tend to vote for a certain party’s candidate because of their ties to the party. Key then declares that one can predict a person’s vote based on their personality and attributes. Key also shows that although these behaviors show strangeness, the voters have great importance to politics. Key says that the voters’ behavior has importance as it helps candidates discover the nature of the voters’ interests to try gain an advantage. Finally, Key states that voters behave as well as possible, considering the possibilities of other

As I was reading Ten Things Political Scientists Know that You Don’t, there was a particular finding of Noels that is relevant to today’s election. I think the first topic, which was called “It’s The Fundamentals, Stupid,” was the most interesting because it points out the obvious things that happen when politicians and their team try to come up with different campaigns, slogans and other stuff that will catch citizens off guard. I think that this is most important part in a campaign because this is where citizens get a first look of who you are, and decide if they will like you or not. Since Americans do not dig deep into

In New York City, it is very fast paced with individuals trying to get from one destination to another. The shops we enter are no longer about only buying products, but customers want an experience. The experience is having more services offered to customers, they don't just want to buy pants anymore, they want food offered in the store. One of the many shops doing this is Barnes & Noble, a bookstore company that is changing our experience in bringing a community together. Barnes & Noble has created this "community bookstore" by adding a Starbucks and hosting special events for customers. Barnes & Noble has become a social setting for consumers, where our experiences in bookstores have changed.

Walker Percy’s essay, “The Loss of the Creature” describes the experiences that each person goes through as either a genuine experience driven by own desires, or one that is already preconceived by experts. Percy believes that people can only learn from experiences that are driven by pure personal desire, and not experiences already preconceived by experts. Percy describes the “loss of sovereignty” as preconceived notions of an experience with the help of experts. W.E.B Du Bois, on the other hand, wrote an essay called, “The Souls of Black Folk” that contradicts Percy’s term of the “loss of sovereignty”. Du Bois strongly believes that with the help of experts, people can then learn what they need to get ahead in life.

By reducing candidates to labels, they are robbed of any true identity. If political candidates were not weighed down by partisan templates, it would enable them to earn votes based on their ideals and goals, not simply by their mascot. Each side has valid ideas; as long as they’re divided, many of those ideas will fall on ears deafened from bias.

Many Americans are aware of the polarization that exists within them and within the government. However, people do not realize the extent of the polarization and the effect that it has on government functions. Susan Page, author of “Divided We Now Stand” explains that many Americans are aware of the increasing polarization, when a political party influences the stance of a person, and that citizens believe that polarization influence politicians more than it influence them. However, Page argues that voters are to blame as well. She uses a survey to illustrate the choices that Americans make on a certain policy. The results of the survey show that Democrats and Republicans choose the stance of their political party, regardless of their own personal opinions on the actual policy (Page). Page’s point proves that politicians are not the only ones that contribute to the government’s dysfunction, and that voters might want to re-evaluate how they process their information and their choices if they wish to see a change.

In Chapter four, Citizen’s Participation, Hudson addresses, one of the greatest worries in the present day American vote based system is the absence of political hobby and support that has expanded following the 1960s. Most political researchers concur with the thought that a sound majority rule government needs a solid measure of support and political adequacy; be that as it may, the huge verbal confrontation includes realizing what is the sum important to be viewed as "solid". Some political researchers trust the hypothesis, in which normal American 's absence of interest is in compelling damage for our popular government. All things considered, there are another gathering of political researchers that are in the camp that trusts that equitable interest is too high, with the approach of political promotion gatherings campaigning government officials, the country has made a gridlock where such a large number of thoughts are in the coliseum, that this nation can 't achieve an agreement any longer. The writer of the book, Hudson, concurs with the first hypothesis that our absence of investment is destructive, and I agree with Hudson, wholeheartedly. The absence of association in the American political procedure, that is at present being

The American public as a whole, however, is wise and acquires political knowledge from more informed sources. James Surowiecki asserts in The Wisdom of Crowds that individuals can be impolitic; however, groups can reach wise decisions. Surowiecki claims, “Even if most people within a group are not especially well-informed or rational, it can still reach a collectively wise decision.” Surowiecki’s argument illustrates that a national referendum would thwart the ill-informed nature of the American voter as a national referendum is a collective decision. American voters can be irrational and ill-informed; nevertheless, most American voters acquire their political knowledge from more educated sources. The acquisition of political knowledge from more well-informed sources undermines the irrational nature of the American voter. Martin Gilens argues in “Two- Thirds Full? Citizen Competence and Democratic Governance” that cue taking enables ill-informed citizens to make a decision on a controversial issue. Gilens contends, “Taking cues from more knowledge elites or acquaintances is a sensible strategy for citizens who lack the ability or inclination to gather the information needed to formulate a preference on a given policy issue.” The collective wisdom of the American public and cue taking enable American voters to overcome their ignorance of politics and past political

As politics and government becomes more complex and involved, more effort is required to keep up with and understand it. As a result, many Americans have lost touch with current events and happenings. Therefore, when election time rolls around, many people lack enough information to develop an educated opinion and support a candidate with their vote, so they just do not vote at all. This lack of information is also related to the belief that one vote will not matter. People believe that their vote will not count, and are therefore following the news less and becoming out of touch with public affairs and politics (Is the System Broken?”). This lack of information is also more strongly apparent among the younger voting population. When interviewed

“Young people are interested in politics, and do have faith in the democratic process. Nonetheless, the political system and the established parties and politicians that dominate it, are together failing to

Gore Vidal, a well-known author and political observer, once said, “Half of the American people have never read a newspaper. Half never voted for President. One hopes it is the same half (“Gore Vidal…”).” These daunting words have become a larger reality with each passing election. Numbers have shown decrease in voter turnout and political knowledge every four years as the growing public loses faith in the United States electoral system.

Finally, the author comes to the conclusion that is obvious to many: if a politician can give us a way to come to a conclusion that feels substantive and doesn’t require an investment of our own time, energy or brain power, we will jump at it whilst giving judgements but never doing any actual research or analysis of our

“Just Facts.com, a nonprofit organization and educational institute commissioned a nationwide poll of people who say that they vote every time there is an opportunity’ or in ‘most elections’. The poll consisted of twenty questions, one concerning voters, political leanings and nineteen dealing with their knowledge of public policy issues. Overall, a majority of voter gave the correct answer to only four of the questions (Facts.com, 2014).” Census are also a wealth of knowledge for provide insight on misinformation “According to a 2014 census, 84% of U.S. households own a computer and 73% of us households have a computer with a broadband connection to the internet with such a high percentage of us households owning computer, more misinformed voters would be voting due to easies access to voting (Facts.com, 2014).” Including form ethical writers on this topic have exclaimed that the ill-informed are a danger to themselves and also others. “When I’m at a restaurant deciding what to eat, I’m deciding for myself I choose to have a hamburger. I’m the person who lives with the consequence. If it’s overly fatty, I get fat, you don’t get fat. if it causes heart disease I get it, not you.’ brennan said. ‘When we’re voting we are imposing cost upon one another.

Some voters cast their ballots based on the emotions such as trust rather than on the candidate's experience or policy. These voters lean toward those candidates who appear to share the voter's concerns on the political issues at the time. They vote for a candidate that appears to be honest and have integrity (Schmidt, Shelley, Bardes, 2011, p.196)