Essay Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Nature of Religious Language

Language corresponds to countless appellations, as the expresser of thought and ultimate origin of philosophy, influencing the world of knowledge with its astonishing qualities. The very essence of cooperation and communication relies eternally on the inspired art of language, without which any possible human development could occur. Furthermore, the perception of verbal communication splits between two realms, reality and literature, constituting two linguistic variations, figurative and literal. Throughout the world of literature, figurative language adds depth and dimension to

In reflecting on this situation, the passages of on the characteristics of those who are shepherds and those who are not come to mind. In the Gospel of John, Jesus communicates the demands of being a shepherd of church.

Language is ab arbitrary system of symbols that is rule governed and allowed communication about things that are distant in time or space. In studying language, it is important to keep in mind distinction between language comprehension and language production. Young children can be understood and respond appropriately to spoken language well before they can produce grammatical speech. (Cook, & Cook, 2014)

The Language Wars have been waged in the realm of English Literature, Language and Linguistics for years. Both sides of the argument are staunch believers in their position, but are more than willing to concede points to the other sides’ favour. In Bryan A. Garner’s essay, “Making Peace in the Language Wars”, he describes himself as a ‘descriptive prescriber’ (Garner, Making Peace in the Language Wars 2008, 270), and offers a truce that fulfils both sides of the argument as the crux of his essay. While the separate sides of the argument are relatively easy to define, it seems that no one sticks to them religiously, and the argument is between individuals fighting over individual points. The two sides are that of the descriptivist and that

Christianity, one of the western religion which is accepted by more than 30% of the world population. Actually, I am not part of this religion: I am from Hindu religion, an eastern religion. In my religion, there are thousands of gods, but I don 't even know the name of more than 50 gods. Unlike Hindu, in Christianity, there is only one God, Jesus Christ, who is the central figure in Christianity. Among the Christianity community, it is believed that God sends his son to the earth to free the people from pain and suffering. For the salvation of the people son of God took an avatar of Jesus Christ. It is also believed that Jesus came back after the third day of his death. As I am the person from a different religion, I find the different concept of God in western religion. We, Eastern people worship many gods and we have many festivals to celebrate but in Christianity, people only follow to Lord Jesus. For them, Christmas is their main festival as it is the birth date of Christ, Easter as the day that Jesus came back from his death.

Some people refer to the semantics of language as “nit-picking.” That is, semantics is the term for the fine nuances in word choice and order to make meaning. Linguists like Lakoff, Johnson argue how proximity and direction play into what is most important in what the writer or speaker is trying to express. Others, like Bolinger, claim that smallest misuse of a person’s semantics can change one’s statement from an absolute truth to a lie. Some parts of this study of meaning can seem a bit extravagant, but most of it can be argued to be plausible. Between the two essays, some parts would be very useful in the classroom and writing, while a couple parts would not.

Although this problem appears to be massive within the churches, the uncontrollable sexual trauma worldwide dictates a “crisis point” also. News reports give us ongoing catastrophic events daily, laced with continual sexual anguish; from rampant pedophiles to the explosion of sex trafficking, let alone the insurmountable sexual sufferings people endured within our “normal” world. At the forefront, within the majority of situations, since one’s Godly divine presence basically befalls omission, (labeling it as being “above and beyond” sexual association); inescapably, an immeasurable amount of people struggle with their misunderstood sexual desires, unaware of their heritage of God’s phenomenal, divine miracle within their beings. Consequently,

In a “Very Short Essay on Religion” by Simon Blackburn, it talks about Blackburn’s two main claims. The first claims states that religious clothing is practical disposition and the second claims that there is not ontology. In the summary I have briefly summarized the article and the two claims. Then I have moved on to my critique, in which I have agreed with the first claim and disagreed with the second claim.

Science was not as prominent as it is now before, some people rejected science and all it had to offer for a long time. This was primarily because of the fact that people did not want to change their belief, not only theirs but their previous generations had believed in this also. This religious dogma they had believed in all their life, it was not until about the scientific revolution in the 16th century that science was widely accepted by all. Thales and his students although wrong were the ones who directed speculative thoughts and also started the process that brought physics, chemistry and other sciences. They were part of the first set of philosophers who started to

Language reflects the most fundamental human need, the desire to communicate. What and how a person says has the ability to stay with us for years and years, shaping us into the people we become. Words possess the ability to change meaning based on the tone of the speaker, as well as have the power to deeply influence another. In his many works, Shakespeare presents a distinctive style of language. Being intentional with the word choice, pauses, and tone of the character reveal how a character feels at a specific point in time.

For all of these, his life was full of wonders. Wittgenstein has become the father of not only one but two of the major movements of modern philosophy: the ideal language philosophy and ordinary language philosophy. His genius as a logician was astonishing; The famous Bertrand Russell virtually gave up serious philosophy not long after meeting him, and even when he later disagreed with Wittgenstein’s ideas, he kept his

Language is a system of making meaning through the use of different forms of communication such as verbal language, written texts, visual properties and gestures. These methods of language progress in stages throughout a child’s development, beginning as early in the mother’s womb.

The language in literature does not necessarily serve the communicative purpose. It is not always used to serve the referential purposes. The communicative and referential value in the literary language is reduced to minimum. The literary language instead of serving the communicative purpose,

The connections between Ludwig Wittgenstein and Soren Kierkegaard as philosophers are not at all immediately obvious. On the surface, Wittgenstein deals with matters concerning the incorrect use of philosophical language and Kierkegaard focuses almost exclusively on answering the question 'how to become a Christian'. But this account belies deeper structural similarities between these men's important works. Thus, this paper suggests that their methods, rather than exclusively content, contain a strong parallel on which a natural and hopefully fruitful examination of their work can be based.

It is essential to argue Heidegger’s concepts of everydayness and worldliness, and Wittgenstein’s notion of phenomenological representation and language, which is most plainly demonstrated in his separation between description and explanation. Undoubtedly, there is not a full similarity, there is no direct correspondence, but the connections that do appear to be there are to some extent exciting and at the same time