Luke And John Comparison

Throughout the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, it is apparent that there are similarities as well as differences when it comes to portraying the life and times of Jesus the Christ, the general descriptions of who Jesus was, and the sayings and deeds of Jesus during his short stay on this earth. Scripture scholars highlight that each Gospel writer viewed Jesus from a different perspective.

All stories explained in the gospels have similar results and main ideas, like Mark, Matthew and Luke as to the Gospel of John is a little more different. The stories of Mark, Matthew and Luke are known as synoptic because

The gospel of Luke and John are gospels about Jesus and John the Baptist. They have several differences and similarities. The Gospel of Luke describes the conception and birth of John the Baptist and Jesus while the gospel of Luke describes their life after birth. Summaries, variances, and connections of these two gospels are discussed below.

The Synoptic Gospels are composed of the gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke. These three gospels covered many of the same stories; yet, they disagree with each other on various details within certain stories. Also, numerous events that are in Mark, is not in Matthew or Luke and vice versa. Many historians have concluded that Mark was the first of the three gospels written and that Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source to their own gospels. The Synoptic Gospels were first written in Greek, which would suggest to some ambiguity within Mark, Matthew, and Luke due to certain perceptions and translations within the Greek language. One ambiguity that is shown within the Synoptic Gospels dealt with Jesus’s view on marriage and divorce. Using

The books of the Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John; where written over 2000 years ago. These books excluding the Gospel of John are often called the synoptic Gospels. The term synoptic is derived from the Greek word meaning “seeing together.” These three books are comparable in their recording of the existence and ministry of Jesus. The wording of the synoptic Gospels is similar as well. For example, the account of the healing of the leaper occurs in all three books and the

The first three gospels are sometimes called the 'synoptic' (same view) gospels. This is because they each cover teaching and miracles by Jesus that are also covered in another account. John, writing later, recounts Jesus' other words and miracles that have a particular spiritual meaning.

Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called Synoptic Gospels because they gave similar accounts and timelines of the life and death of Jesus. All three follow the same order of events in narrating Jesus' public ministry(Harris, 2015). They all begin with his baptism, followed by his tours. After readers read any of the three stories, they can see how Jesus performed miracles. Proponents of the Griesbach theory believe that Mark is a blending of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke(Harris,2015). They believe this because a few passages mentioned in all three Gospels show Matthew and Luke agreeing against Mark. Supporters believe that Mark was the source for Matthew and Luke. Arguments for this theory state that this theory is a better argument because while

Although Matthew and Luke describe Jesus’ birth differently, we can know that they are both completely accurate because the Bible is the inspired Word of GOD. It is simply, different people writing about the same account from different perspectives or witnesses. While Matthew talks about King Herod and the wise men, Luke goes into detail about the location of his birth in the manger and the shepherds. The books of Matthew and Luke describe the birth of Christ with many similarities and differences.

On the surface, the Gospels of Luke and John seem to contain more differences than similarities; just as the men who wrote them were different. Author of one of the synoptic Gospels, Luke, identified by Paul as the beloved physician (Col. 4:14), was a well-educated Gentile who writes a historical, non-eyewitness, carefully investigated, consecutive account of events (Luke 1:3) for the specific purpose that the recipient would “know the exact truth” of what he was taught (Luke 1:4). From the angel of the Lord’s words to Zacharias preceding Jesus’ birth to Christ’s ascension into heaven, Luke gives great detail of events and is more interested in persons than ideas.

The major differences between the Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels are the following:

While the Synoptic Gospels, comprised of Matthew, Mark and Luke are primarily three retellings of the same story, each writer’s narrative seems to be geared to different audiences. Mark, who did not actually travel with Jesus, but was a disciple of Peter, has a distinction that the other two do not. While all three gospels are accurate and complete, the book of Mark, written according to the preaching of the Peter, gives the reader a more personal experience of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

The gospel of Luke is one of the four gospels pertaining to the New Testament. The Gospel of Luke is the most extensive historical account of the life of Jesus. It was originally written for a certain Theophilus, probably a Gentile of high social standing, and intended to inform him extensively of the life and work of Christ. Throughout this gospel the person of Jesus is presented as the perfect Man who always lived according to the will of God. And the account that Luke offers us of his life appears divided in two basic parts: the coming to the world of the Son of God and the return to his glory. It narrates from before the birth of John the Baptist, until the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the first books of the New Testament within the Bible, The Gospels as they are so called. The words of the Gospels tell of the teachings of Jesus and his disciples and they bring the word of God to others through the land. Now, the books of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called synoptic gospels as they are all very similar as to the way the stories are structured, worded, and similarity in context. As for the book of John, this book differs a bit with its structure being different than the 3 before and also its perception, or depiction, of Christ.

The Synoptic Gospels have different depictions on Jesus due to their sources. It is purposed the Two-Source theory, which Matthew and Luke used information from Mark, and another source called Q (ABD, 263). It shines light on how each gospel writer came to their conclusion of Jesus in their work. There is data to help make this theory be plausible. Matthew and Luke have parallels in them from using information from Q, but

The synoptic problem is the problem of the literary relationships among the first three "Synoptic"Gospels. Matthew, Mark and Luke are called Synoptic Gospels because they can be seen together and displayed in three parallel columns.The three gospels contain many of the same stories and sayings often related in the same relative sequence, however there are also important differences in the wording of individual stories and sayings, in ordering of some materials, and in the overall extent of each gospel. In some instances, the degree of verbatim agreement or the sequential agreement in the arrangement of episodes and sayings is so strong that one must posit some kind of literary relationship among the gospels.By contrast there are often marked