Luke 's Ethical Dilemma Of A Adult Entertainment Retail Store Plan Essay

Ethics is the guiding force in any respectable organization. With a moral compass, especially in the leadership of organization, a company can become compromised and fall into a quagmire of legal issues, a tarnished reputation, and devaluation of company stock if it is a publically traded company. In pursuit of examine my own ethical lens I will analyze the ethical traits of an admired leader, my own traits as exhibited in the Ethical Lens Inventory, and how I make a decision concerning a particular ethical dilemma.

The warehouse that Mark had sold off when he sold his previous company was still for sale after being on the market for two years and having over $2M spent on getting it ready for sale. Since Mark had an existing relationship with the landlord, the real estate market was at a record low, and Mark didn’t have to take a loan since he still had the cash from his previous venture. The landlord was asking $9/square foot, tempting Mark to make the same mistake that the competition made. Instead of accepting it and falling into the trap, Mark did extensive research on the town and comps in the area and felt confident offering $4.50/square foot in four consecutive five year leases starting at $4, then $4.25, all the way to $5 thus freeing up more working capital for the launch of his business. Mark’s homework on his timing paid off and locked down the warehouse he previously owned but for his new venture.

Luke is an employee of ABC Company. He has been assigned to a construction of an adult entertainment retail store within a neighborhood his brother, Owen, lives in. The development of the retail store has not been made public yet and will be announced one month from today. This announcement will decrease the property values of the surrounding areas significantly. Owen is trying to sell his house. He told Luke that he recently received an ‘okay’ offer. However, in hopes that a better offer might be present itself in a few years after the real estate market improve, he has not taken the offer yet. Luke is very close to his brother, which makes him concerned about his confidentiality obligation to ABC Company.

Every day people make decisions that may have profound effect on their personal and/or professional lives as well as the lives of others. The decision people make have a foundation on their personal, cultural, and perhaps organizational values. When these values are in disagreement, an ethical dilemma occurs.

In the above case study the ethical dilemma is whether to give the contract to company A which is a fair option among the two or give the contract to company B because it is run by Nirmal’s friend Devraj.

Management is often faced with ethical dilemmas that have no clear cut correct answer. In our case study, (1)Desperate Air, George Nash, Vice President of Real Estate faces a conflict of values similar to the CEO in Seglin’s article, “How to Make Tough Ethical Calls”. They both want to tell the truth and they want to protect their companies, their investors, their employees, and their own livelihood. Neither Mr. Nash nor the CEO conducted a through examination of the problem they faced. I believe the decision to remain silent made by both Nash and the CEO to be short sighted, based solely on short term profit, and would not have been the route I would have taken.

Ethical dilemma is the concept of a complex situation where there is no apparent answer or there are two competing solutions (Winch). It is unlikely that one will achieve the correct answer in an ethical dilemma as the answer will vary due to several factors influencing the person’s reasoning. Factors such as culture, environment, education, family, religion, age, gender, media outlets, etc. can influence someone’s point of view in an ethical dilemma. The case study, “Bankruptcy at the Philadelphia Inquirer” represents a dilemma with no clear or apparent answer.

Luke, an employee of ABC Company has an ethical issue that makes him go and look for advise at the Ethics Department of ABC Company. The department of Ethics Department is dedicated to advise employee and prevent any risks of losing their jobs because of unaware immoral decisions. Now that the company has decided to build an adult entertainment retail store, Luke has come across a big decision. The Department of Ethics needs to help Luke decide to whether, obey his commencement with ABC Company and keep confidentiality until they make it public, or to warn his brother, Owen (who lives in the neighborhood that would be affected) that his house would substantially depreciate and he may lose money if he does not sell the house now

“ Buying Influence or engaging in Conflict of Interest”, Is one of the ethical dilemmas mentioned. Darlene was in charge of contracting airplane manufactures for defense contracts. She often dealt with Boeing Inc. through which she got to know many Boeing mangers. When her daughter and son-in-law could not find new employment, she tried to influence Boeing managers to hire them by indicating that she would be favorable towards

In this day and age, there are many different ways young teens can be exposed to risky behaviors. Whether it is on social media or in a printed magazine, teens are surrounded by negative influences and unethical behavior. Abercrombie & Fitch has always been a popular brand for young teens in America. This company has been in the news a lot in the past regarding their clothing, sexually oriented advertising and their provocative nature.

1. Consequentialist moral theories see the moral rightness or wrongness of actions as a function of their results. If the consequences are sufficiently good, the action is right; if they are sufficiently bad, the action is wrong. However, nonconsequentialist theories see other factors as also relevant to the determination of right and wrong.

Ten years later, Jim realised that the property value surrounding his area has increased significantly. Jim then considers checking what options he had that could increase his profit by selling his three hectares land. During his attempt to seek options that could maximise his profit, an estate agent, a town planner and an architect advised Jim that he should make new footpaths and roads, then subdivide his three hectares land and build new ten town houses by which he could sell them.

It is a relevant ethical dilemma because it is a situation in which an ethical decision needs to be made by a businessman (CFO of Gabriel Resources) where viable options to this case are available which will be judged further in this essay by applying ethical theory and concepts.

Although CBS and Hank may have breached their fiduciary duty to Oliver as real estate agent, there is no evidence or written agreement explaining to prove who may be speaking the truth. Oliver, the seller, had the option to not follow through the contract if he had felt uncomfortable and shaky about the deal. Oliver was aware of the Ziffels’ financial risks and acknowledged the fact that their first loan application was denied and that their offer was lower than asking price. On the other hand, Oliver complains for Hank’s deceptive statement for untruthfully explaining the Ziffels’ financial position, and for calling the Washington Heights apartment complex when instructed to not do so. In brief, there is no written statement justifying their claims and discussion, while Oliver was attentive of the Ziffels’ loan status and continued working with Hank.

The objective of this paper is to identify and analyse the policies specified by government and organisations for the protection of consumer interests and the role of ethics in consumer choice. It also analyses the role of ethics in consumer culture and give examples of how the service sector reacts to it.