Lynda Neser Case

On July 29, 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a white woman was brutally raped by a black male with a knife to her throat. The black male broke into her apartment while she was asleep. Jennifer Thompson woke up to the stranger when he had begun to attack her. When she first saw her attacker, she offered to give him her car and money, but he declined that’s when she realized he wasn’t there to rob her but to rape her. During the time Jennifer Thompson was being raped, she tried to remember the characteristics of the black male so that later she could identify him to the police. Jennifer Thompson was able to escape out of the back the door of her apartment and she ran to her neighbors home which they called the police. That same night the black male raped

A hispanic female named Anna Garcia who was 38 years of age, was found dead on the date of August 14, 2015 in Anytown, U.S.A. She was 64 inches in height and 165 pounds. The case of Anna Garcia first began on a hot, 92°F summer morning. A next door neighbor, Doug Greene, had decided to call police at 9:45 am to place his concern about Garcia because of her dog that had been barking all morning, which was highly unusual. Being that he had not seen or heard from her since the previous morning, he called her, then went over to her house to make sure nothing was wrong. Both the police and EMT arrived at 9:56 am. When questioned by police, Greene informed them that he had seen her the previous morning around 6:30 am walking her dog. He also stated that he saw her wearing a sweater, which was found odd because of the current heat wave. The front door had to be broken down in order to enter the house. Upon entering the house, they found Garcia lying face down in the entry hallway. Inside, the house was a temperature of 73°F. Immediately after Anna Garcia was

On June 5, 2016 I was forced to work an overtime event when Joyce and Vicki Hoak with less seniority purposely took a vacation day the Friday before the event. Once again on Nov. 15 ,2016 I was mandated to work overtime 7:00 am. to 3:30 pm even though Cliff Worthy, Vicki Hoak have less seniority and with Joyce being excluded from all Saturday overtime due to her schedule work day. However, when Danny Kelly and Harry Feals worked Joyce’s routine they were mandated to work Saturday overtime. In both incidents I filed an oral grievance with Scott union steward and talked to Joe director of Maintenance.

Neser aptly observes that the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of the HCGPP is discounted by the fact Griffin articulated his statements regarding the section’s intent after this question into the nuances of this provision arose. Indeed, the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony is discounted to the extent that it might constitute an ad hoc iteration of the agency’s subsequently articulated intent. Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of this provision is nevertheless consistent with the subsequent amendment made to adopt the Board’s interpretation of the statute. “While amendments are not controlling as to the meaning of prior iteration of the same statutory scheme, ‘nevertheless, subsequent legislation

FORT WORTH, Texas (Feb. 28, 2017) -- Lena Pope’s Young Professional Advocates group is throwing a groovy party on Sept. 29, 2017 at the Shack at Panther Island Pavilion. This adults-only event will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will end at midnight. This is an 80s theme occasion for young adults and all attendees are encouraged to dress according to the theme.

In your grievance filed at Cook Unit, you claim the changes to Department Order 914 are vague and ambiguous, thus violating your Constitutional Rights. You further assert the changes are difficult to comply with. Your resolution is to reverse the changes made to the policy.

An individual may stay in a violent relationship for a variety of factors, making it difficult to remain safe. For example, love, fear, pride, loyalty, embarrassment, children, lack of knowledge about options, low self-esteem, or a combination of these factors. Thus, safety is the first priority for any victim of domestic violence (California Attorney General's Office, 2002). As such, a critical first step for Dr. Breyker is to identify, validate, and address the heightened dangers Anita could face. Effectively blocking Ab’s ability to continue his control over Anita should also be uppermost in determining the referrals Dr. Breyker will give to Anita. Naturally, referrals to law enforcement are primary. But the individual circumstances of Anita’s

This matter is before the Court on a Petition Steven M. Labrie for attorney’s fees associated with his appeal from a decision from the Department of Labor and Training [“DLT”].

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITIES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 902 INMATE LEGAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS

Anilda Rodriguez, adoptive mother/grand aunt, reported that her 14 year old, adoptive son Anthony Rodriguez, is disrespectful towards authority figures, failing all of his classes, multiple suspension from school and does not take ownership of his ungoverned behavior. According to Ms. Rodriguez she has been taking care of Anthony since he was 1 ½ year old. Ms. Rodriguez reported that Anthony is diagnose with ADHD and has an IEP. Ms. Rodriguez reported that the child has engaged in mental health services since the age of 5. Ms. Rodriguez reported that the child received appropriate mental health services and psychotropic medication (Focalin XR 25mg) prescribed by psychiatrist George Alvarado (718) 283-8215 (once a month) at Maimonides’s Mental

This appeal arises out of an order of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County affirming the decision of the Board of Appeals (“Board”) of the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (“DLLR”) to deny appellant’s, Gallen Floyd’s (“Floyd’s”), application for unemployment insurance benefits. Floyd contends that the Board found he was terminated due to gross misconduct in want of substantial evidence to support its conclusion. Additionally, Floyd avers the Board erroneously considered hearsay evidence in violation of procedural due process.

Lynda Bradley Courts is an incredibly active Community Volunteer for her hometown of Atlanta. Ms. Courts graduated from The Westminster Schools and continued on to receive her bachelor’s degree in English from the University of Georgia. Additionally, she successfully completed the Shakespeare Institute program of the University of Birmingham in Stratford upon Avon, England. She also holds a master’s degree in English Education from Florida State University. Following graduation, Ms. Courts worked as an instructor for the English Department of Georgia State University.

Our focus now turns to a petition posted to the UK Government’s petition website, “Free childcare for 2 year olds to include parents who are both working full time” by Emily Bignell where we will assess the circumstances and audience in which it was made, and how it compares to the stylistic traits exhibited in Nakiryowa. First, the context of Bignell’s petition is different from Nakiryowa, with Bignell having posted on a governmental website whereas Narikawa on a public, unaffiliated website. Unlike the unset numerical standards on change.com, the UK site posits that only “at 100,000 signatures, [will] this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament. Since the petition can only be signed by UK citizens, working class parents in the UK stand to be likely supporters and beneficiaries of Bignell’s petition, in its pursuit to convince the UK government to pass helpful legislation.

During appeal and investigation, the discovery and confirmation of lack of compensation resulted in Martinez having good cause for quitting his job. His previous employer was ordered to pay back wages. Martinez then challenged the denial of his reemployment compensation claim and the amount of work credits he was entitled to. The denial was overturned after good cause granted, however the additional income was not considered since income is calculated during the calendar quarter it is received and not necessarily when it was earned. Therefore, following the laws governing how reemployment assistance is calculated ruled that Martinez’s benefit amounts could not be adjusted to reflect back pay.