Lynn White The Historical Roots Of The Human Impact On The Environment

In general, when our society discusses religion and technology, we discuss them as opposites, as two things that are essential to our lives but are incompatible when considered together. In his book Religion of Technology, David Noble argues against this common idea. Noble argues that they are not only compatible in our modern day, but that they have been essential to each others growth for much of religious history. In the text, Noble outlines the history of the intertwining of religion and technology, focusing primarily on “useful arts” from the past and artificial intelligence, atomic weapons, biological engineering, and space exploration in our present day. While it may seem that these scientific advances has very little to do with religion,

During the Middle Ages, the relationship between science and religion was central to the ability of intellectuals to pursue the natural sciences. Without approval from their religious leaders, the great thinkers of the Middle Ages were unable to make any large strides in natural philosophy. However, this does not mean that the pervasiveness of religion prevented science from thriving. Rather, the nature of the relationship between science and religion was wholly dependent on the religion in question. In some cases, such as in Christianity, science was given a comparably more sympathetic environment in which to grow and develop. Due to the necessity of a class of men who were both theologians and natural philosophers in Christian societies,

Science made abortions available which is made a conflict and made people do it. The big bang which some turn people away from God. Genetic engineering which made people change instead of staying the same. Human cloning which gave man not born but made. There’s always a constant war between science and religion and that someday science could eventually ruin religion. In the book science has taken over society. A Christian might say that science is always against religion and is true that it is happening slowly.

Christian voice is correcting them or proclaiming the biblical model of man’s relationship to nature which: is unique and superior to the dominant free-market and environmentalist models. . According to Gardner and Stern (1996), in that place are exclusive approaches that have power to be implemented in companionships search to defend the environment. One like approach may take a closer look at holy and regarding duties beliefs and the effects of these beliefs on the environment. The idea to create values and beliefs in environmental issues are important components of having a safer and enjoyable world for its people and the world they live in. Christian and non-Christian, at hand, must see the environment and the shortcoming of business by reason of a proper conversion to an act or purpose of and preservation of the wealth the planet has to support life. Christians as the Bible originate directing the eye to what has to be published by word force in reference to human natures dependence and bounden duty to the nature and its resources. As Christians we should do what ever it takes to make sure this earth glorify God. If we are careless about science and economics — not caring about how they work and what they describe, creation’s economy will suffer (Christians Research Institute).

Religion and ecology are two concepts that rarely intersect in popular culture. Religious individuals are expressed as devout followers of strict doctrine where ecologists are often seen as free flowing lovers of peace. These polar opposite perceptions impact not only the cultural views of those practicing these beliefs, but they also influence the way each group is seen in the world. One religion that is commonly referenced in our society’s popular culture is Christianity. Due to its anthropocentric teachings, Christianity is often seen not just as the opposite of environmentalism, but also in many ways: the enemy. On the other hand, Christians are also viewed as individuals who contribute heavily to improving our world through many different positive campaigns focused around aiding both people and the world in which we live. So in this mix of many different reputations and ideas, where does Christianity truly stand? Does it help the environment or hurt it? Though the Christian faith has potential causes for ecological damage, its beliefs are largely misunderstood, and there are many more factors to explore in regards to the environmental crisis than one religious doctrine. Christianity is not solely responsible for the ecological crisis.

In the Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, Lynn White argues that western Christianity is guilty and responsible for the current environmental crisis. He writes that Christianity gave human a reason to be a master over other living creatures and “nature objects”. I agree with White’s opinion that Christianity affected the nature negatively, but I expect no responsibilities for Christians. In this paper, I will write about why I support White’s idea, but not fully.

Over the past couple of years, humans have managed to alter our landscape in various ways. As our population and sense of creation increases, we get the urge to expand our living and build up new technology alongside with it. Although this gradual change seems like a natural path for us to take, it also poses as a great threat. We are rapidly using all of our resources and by doing so, we continue to harm the environment in which we live in and also for future generations to come. If it wasn’t actions such as President Ulysses S. Grant signing for Yellow Stone to be the first national park or the Wilderness Act in 1964( NTL PARKS VIDEO); Our environment as we know it today, will not have some of its beautiful wilderness or protected areas that

The Judeo-Christian-Muslim thought is based on the idea that God gave humanity “dominion over the animals of the earth”. Through this idea it is believed that nature is for humanity’s use and purposes. The Judeo-Christian-Muslim thought brought about industrialization, scientific progress, as well

Who is responsible for what happens to the natural environment? When disaster affects humanity’s environment, regardless of whether it is at the hand of nature or man, people look to authority figures for answers, or to find someone to place the blame. Unsurprisingly, this concept also holds true for religion. Such was the case for Christianity in Europe during the eighth century. Rudolf, Monk of Fulda’s narrative of St. Leoba, recounts natural and unnatural events which impacted the town, and as the abbess, St. Leoba held responsibility over the followers’ well-being. This connection between humanity and their different surroundings reflects the literary theory ecocriticism. Rudolf, Monk of Fulda’s narrative The Life of St. Leoba conveys the

Nature is constantly in the process of change. However, Buddhism believes that these changes in nature are largely influenced by the actions of humans. Since the environment and human morality are interdependent, changes in one results in changes in the other, whether they are beneficial or adverse. Thus, the Eightfold path serves as a guide to help individuals act in ways that will be beneficial towards our environment. Unfortunately, the majority of our contemporary morals characterize greed, hatred, ignorance, and several other “bad behaviors”. Therefore, for as long as humans base their lives through immorality, our environment will continue to deteriorate. “The Buddhist Attitude Towards Nature” by Lily de Silva represents this relationship between the morality of man and nature. Silva writes, “When mankind is demoralized through greed, famine is the natural outcome; when moral degeneration is due to ignorance, epidemic is the inevitable result; when hatred is the demoralizing force, widespread violence is the ultimate outcome” imposing the idea that man’s immorality cause the depletion of Earth (Silva, “The Buddhist Attitude Towards Nature”). For example, when self-growing rice developed on Earth, people began hoarding food, which resulted in an increase in consumer demand; but the growth rate of the food was not sufficient for the consumer demands. Due to this issue, land was divided between families and people began stealing. This greedy attitude, which signified moral degeneration among man led to a negative impact on our nature. Soon, the soil transformed and the self-growing rice stopped to grow. The effect that the behavior of man had on nature displays the significance of environmental ethics. The author continues to say that we will sustain stable environmental ethics when immorality does not exist, and humans understand the importance of how bad ethical

My paper is about anthropocentrism, stewardship and christianity. Anthropocentrism and christianity are the current leading worldviews in the western culture and there is something deeply disturbing with those world views in relation to the environmental crisis. It is important to scrutinize anthropocentrism because it is wildly incompatible with scripture. Anthropocentrism of western culture dominates the globe. It is the belief that humans are superior to all other life forms and entitled to use them. The belief of anthropocentrism is that the earth belongs to humanity, the resources exist for the betterment of people, and that humans are obviously supreme. The consequence of this belief is a long history of abuse to our planet and a blind sightedness to the loss of the planets richness and beauty. This view has led to severe climate change, severe mass extinctions, and trashing of our seas and lands. The misuse of the bible accompanies the

to be grown trees have to be cut down and I have explained the effects

Nearly everything that a human does is in response to the environment. Our lives are defined by what is around us and what we find in front of us, whether this means accepting, dealing with or changing it. This has been the pattern since primates first stood up and became Homo erectus, and has continued until we considered ourselves doubly wise. The shape of the land affected where humans moved. Weather was something with which to contend. Fire affected humans until they conquered it – and herein lies the core of the relationship. The earth affects humans, and humans affect it back, viewing characteristics and patterns as problems and challenges, and finding a solution.

Many individuals will argue that population growth or technological development are the primary causes of environmental degradation. There is also a third cause of environmental degradation that people hypothesize, which is our values. These people believe that major values influence population growth and technological development. The argument is that values are more important, and influence population growth and technological development. Key values come from national, racial and religious cultures and are transmitted via other people, institutions, popular culture and mass media. Lynn White argues that humans have damaged our world and we need to craft solutions. White puts the blame for environmental degradation on our religious views. White’s argument explains most environmental impacts well but does not explain the scale of these impacts, more specifically the mass amount or rate at which actions are taken that degrade the environment.

Found within various articles and books, the discipline of environmental history permeates the study of nature and humans. By combining a multitude of studies and methodologies, authors explore the aspects of the environment and nature along with human interaction to understand how they commingle, affecting one another. In the following four books and one article, scholars from varying backgrounds approach environmental history in an assortment of methods in order to prove their thesis. Their methodologies shape their thought process and lead to the structure of these books. Further investigation into this process reveals the authors’ intentions, enabling readers to understand how methodology fuels the writing process, creating an argument, and producing valuable work.