M. J. Ferrell Case Summary

Did the union violate Title I, Section 101(a) of the Landrum-Griffin Act in this case? If so, what should be the appropriate remedy?

Leslie Repyneck 2265 Silver Creek Rd., Hellertown, Pa. 18055 (610) 393-5253 was advised of the identity of Investigator Sean P. Brennan and of the confidential nature and purpose of the interview, Repyneck, provided the following information:

On Tuesday (October 11th), we are requesting Council‘s approval of a resolution authorizing the purchase of 1750 Grant Street (APN: 224-02-022).

The plaintiff, Brian Seamons, was assaulted in the locker room by a group of his teammates by grabbing him, forcibly restraining him, and bounded to a towel rack with highly adhesive athletic tape. Brian was exposed and his fellow team members and a girl who Brian had dated in the past to see him. Brian reported this episode to the school authorities and the football coach. The coach blamed Brian for selling out the group and the school authorities crossed out the last playoff match because of this episode. Brian needed to move to an alternate school because of the environment this incident created. Brian brings this suit under Title IX by expressing that he was dealt with distinctively in light of his gender. He contends that he was

The undersigned attended the Lien Conference held at the Fresno Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on May 11, 2017. The undersigned appeared on behalf of Mr. Rod McClelland. Mr. McClelland had an unavoidable calendar conflict on the day of the hearing. If you have any questions regarding this Lien Conference, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. McClelland.

Nova Scotia politician Steve Sampson, a member of Richmond County council says that he has been blackmailed over a mail escort. Sampson says that he recently received an anonymous letter that shows a call from his hotel room to a male escort agency. In the letter, the blackmailer had written that they will release a copy of a hotel bill from February 2014, unless Sampson resigns from his position and promises not to run for office again. Sampson had later confirmed that the bill included a phone call to a male escort service, incurred while he was on county business in Seattle, Washington. Sampson said that he trusted local residents to weigh the motives of the blackmailer against his conduct during twenty-five years as a councilor. He said

Hakeim Macklin is a fourteen year old African-American male before the Portsmouth Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court on charges of trespassing on school property and two counts of destruction of property. On December 21, 2016, Hakeim appeared in Portsmouth Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court with his mother and attorney before the Honorable Substitute Judge first name Nicola. After all evidence was heard, Hakeim was found guilty of destruction of property and trespassing on school property. A social history report was ordered and the case was continued until January 25, 2017. His charge of burglary was continued for trial on the same date.

The motivational approach Mr. Ferrell is using is intrinsic reward. Because of the personal satisfaction, he has. He follows the rules of Right-Way super market which lead him to believe he is making an significant contribution to this organization (pg.296). Which he seems to think means he does not need to listen to his employees. Mr. Ferrell exhibits elements of scientific management. He sees Amy as more of a machine than a human being there to work not to suggest concepts for a business, he’s worked at longer. Whereas, I would use extrinsic rewards as a motivation. This ensures that an employee knows they are appreciated it can be as simple as telling them what a good job or in this case listening to an employee’s ideas.

During our negotiation with D.G. Barnhouse (DGB), we intend to utilize an integrative bargaining strategy with management. Before coming to this conclusion, we weighed the advantages and disadvantages of a distributive approach, however, we eventually decided to take an integrative and predominantly interest based stance versus a position based stance in our negotiations after assessing internal and external environmental factors. In addition, we settled on this strategy because we ultimately believe that management and the union share at the very least, one fundamental common interest, which is the firm’s financial stability. That being said, even with our plans to use integrative bargaining, we still plan to negotiate assertively to achieve

Demonstrators marched through the streets, chanting slogans, and held protest outside the offices of several corporations. The purpose of the demonstration was to protest policies of the Regan Administration and of certain corporations based in Dallas. In a political demonstration during the Republican National Convention in Texas, Gregory Lee Johnson doused an American flag with kerosene and set it on fire. During the burning of the flag, the demonstrators shouted, “America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you.” No one was hurt but some witnesses said they were offended. One witness picked up the flag’s charred remains and buried them in his backyard. Johnson was charged and convicted with the desecration of a venerated object, in violation

Kerry Middleton is a fifty-two year old Caucasian male and is currently married to his wife Sherrifor more than 20 years. For the past several months Kerry has been experiencing night sweats,repetitive nightmares and extreme amounts of anxiety. Most nights Sherri has to wake him aftersweating profusely and shaking in his sleep. When he is finally woken up, it becomes difficult for him tofall back to sleep. During the daytime Kerry has reported feeling terribly disconnected to hissurroundings. He often finds himself in a place of despair and self-hatred. Kerry daily indulges in anenormous amount of alcohol and from time-to-time recreational drugs to convince him-self thateverything is going to be ok. Up until a few months ago Kerry was the Chief

The Dred Scott decision was a landmark Supreme Court decision on slavery in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom after living in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory where slavery was banned. Mr. Scott argued that he should be free since he had lived on free soil. The Supreme Court was to decide three questions: should a black person be considered a citizen and have the ability to sue in court, Did residence in a free state make Mr. Scott free? Did Congress possess the power to prohibit slavery in a territory? The Court was divided on these questions and each Justice issued an opinion. Chief Justice, Roger B. Taney, declared “that only white persons could be citizens”. He insisted that the founding fathers believed that

The election of 1988 pitted Vice President George H.W Bush against Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis. Coming off the back of President Reagan’s second term, Vice President Bush needed to build on the sense of optimism that Reagan had instilled and make a case for continuity. Governor Dukakis on the other hand had to try and paint himself as good alternative to some of the pitfalls of President Reagan’s later years. Coming off an economic collapse, insider trading scandals, and a growing drug problem, there was no shortage of material for ad agencies to work with. The ads from 1988 paint a picture of an overall negative race, even when compared to 2016’s charged election, while also producing some of the most infamous and effective ads in campaign history.

Is it better for a person to be honest or deceitful about the choices the choices they make? Honesty and deceit can both bring consequences. The truth can bring shame and judgment, but it can also bring strength. Whereas lies can bring guilt, agony, and weakness. Nathaniel Hawthorne tries to emphasize the truth is always better.

I feel that Dr. P has a case in this situation. I feel he has the ability to sue for compensatory damages. I would argue that Dr. P is a public figure. As you said he is the foremost academic on exposure to violence and the human psyche. Since he is a public figure and his work is important to public interest. Because of this we have to prove malice. In this case we also have to determine how defamation of DR. P is present. We have to answer how his reputation is being harmed, how his standing in the community is being harmed.