preview

M1-S1 And Autism

Good Essays

“Despite the physiological and potential cause of autism, there are many factors that are key in defining autism” (Marko et. al. 2015). Some of these deficits are seen in communication, social skills, stereotypes, and repetitive behaviors. Cerebellum plays a key role in some of the findings seen in autism, because it is connected to regions associated with the basal ganglia as well as the frontal cortex. Children seen with early cerebellar show different symptoms of autism. “The connection between M1-S1 found in fine motor skills were seen in the motor-sensory homunculus and hand-region” (Thompson et. al 2016). This study shows that the development of M1-S1 has a key role in fine motor skills. The findings from the “minimally verbal children …show more content…

This showed the nature and degree of growth from each participant in the study. To see that Imitated speech was somewhat difficult to get from the participants, was odd because these children since being diagnosed have been getting speech therapy. The children did show effective results and hard work when it came to the number of consonants and vowels they got correct. In the AMMT session twenty -three participants improved in the twenty-five sessions they had of therapy. The trails had a high correlation, this allowed the ability of these participants to repeat correctly the distinct sounds at baseline. For the study this meant that the participants that will get the most results from AMMT will be those who can imitate speech sounds. And this seems to be because of intonation-based treatments ability to harness …show more content…

This is because the results are shocking at times. A child with ASD in some studies can perform better than a child that doesn’t have ASD, and that is where trying to understand the results become difficult. For example, there was a study done with adults with ASD and their capability to combine sensory information in helping the individual identify an object (Nakano et. al 2012). Individuals with ASD was given the task to recognize objects from visual ques and compared to the control subjects the ASD group made more errors. The experimental group compared to the control group had less errors when it came to haptic tracing and identifying objects. The results in the study show that people with autism are worse in visual information than the control group, but are better than the control group when it comes to proprioceptive information. It is proven through other studies that those with autism can perform better than those who do not have the disorder. There is a research that was done by Haswell, that showed participants with autism having greater coordinates, proprioceptive and intrinsic adaptations (Haswell et. al.

Get Access