MBA527 Week 6 Homework submission Essay

To better understand the original question put forth, we must first define a few key terms. The NCAA is the National Collegiate Athletics Association. The NCAA has the final ruling in all matters of conduct in college sports. In short, it controls almost every aspect of athletics in college sports. The word sanction means: to

The NCAA has been around and evolved since the beginning of college sports. This organization is a non-profitable organization, but ironically makes more than millions of profit per year. Branch states “that money comes from a combination of ticket sales, concession sales, merchandise, licensing fees, and other sources—but the great bulk of it comes from television contract”(pg. 228). Meanwhile, the student-athletes do not receive any of this money. This is the start of an unsubstantial business between universities built around amateurism.

In the area of collegiate sports, there have been numerous heated debates about the integrity of many things concerning the NCAA and how it handles legal and ethical issues. Two well renowned scholars tackle this issue in their co-authored book entitled

There are rules and regulation for everything. The DMV requires certain forms of identification for your driver’s license and the IRS requires you to file your income tax in a certain way to avoid penalty. It is no different when we are talking about the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). NCAA has strict regulation on its players and its member schools that must abide by. Although NCAA regulates pretty much everything through its 427-page manual, some rules were difficult if not impossible to enforce. In the case of Oliver v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, the conflict emerges as Andy Oliver questioned NCAA’s power to regulate in the face of court.

In 1995, several years after he stepped down as the NCAA’s executive director of 36 years, Walter Byers published Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Exploiting College Athletes. The title didn’t belie the book’s content. Among Byers’ confessions was the deception he sought in coining the well-worn phrase “student-athlete” to describe college athletes.

Student athletes face a major problem that the NCAA holds them accountable. If any student athlete commits what is held as an NCAA violation they are forced to miss playing time or other consequences as well. NCAA violations have become a chronic problem in collegiate sports. When students violate the NCAA rules it can jeopardize their future career in whatever sport they are playing. Some of the rules don’t even make sense they are just useless. These rules need to be dealt with in order for the students to just be able to go along with their lives.

This paper explores the novel Tainted Glory: Marshall University, the NCAA, and One Man’s Fight for Justice written by B. David Ridpath, who published the novel in March 2012. This novel is about how Ridpath began working in compliance in intercollegiate athletics and his struggles while trying to create a strong and effective program. Under his program, he worked to make sure that the coaches and athletes at Marshall University would follow the compliance rules, but later he learned that many coaches and athletes did not understand or want to follow the rules of the NCAA. This novel recounts the struggles that Ridpath had to endure as he attempted to educate the coaches and athletes about the rules and regulations, but it also shows that some

Since collegiate athletics have begun, there have been all kinds of cheating scandals involving the big-time college sports. College sports today are filled with preventable, scandalous acts made by college coaches and administrators. An example of this would be the case of fake “paper classes” at the University of North Carolina at Chapel-Hill. I personally believe that the NCAA should not have imposed any sanctions or allegations amongst the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for academic integrity violations, threatening to take away titles, and making athletes ineligible to compete.

In the area of collegiate sports, there have been numerous heated debates about the integrity of many things concerning the NCAA and how it handles legal and ethical issues. Two well renowned scholars tackle this issue in their co-authored book entitled

These fans like the way in which the sport is played now, and they fear that change to the policies or rewards could put their beloved sports in danger. In addition to this, the current collegiate sport coaches are just on-site pawns that the NCAA can manipulate. The NCAA can make any rule or regulation that they would like, and if the coaches do not follow, it may just cost them their job. Finally, we look to the athletes, these individuals are truly the most influential figures in collegiate sport. These are members that can make the biggest difference when it comes to the future of university athletics. The problem with this is, student athletes do not want to risk all that they have, just to try and change some rules that they may not agree with. Every college student thinks that they are going to go pro, and there is no way that they will blow that chance by stepping out of line to fight for something that may not be right. With all that is said, there have been many great strides in the past to make university athletics a better and more fair place, but there is still much more work that needs to be

Colleges illegally pay college athletes for their services. This choice has caused uprisings in the college athletic world. Even though college athletes can't legally accept benefits, there are still people who accept them without the approval of the NCAA. These violations lead to players getting suspended from their athletics as well as getting in problems with the NCAA. These punishments also hurt the students academics as well. The NCAA president stated, "Rather than push college athletics further and further from academics, we need to bring it closer" (Emmert). The NCAA wants to connect athletics and academics and bring

Though it was a negative situation, this scandal being absolved would bring a positive light to the NCAA as they were finally able to overcome regional politics and proved they had the power to punish institutions for violating the guidelines. Not long after the PCC crimes, the NCAA implemented full-ride scholarships for student-athletes to help clean up college sports illicit activity. The true amateurism wasn’t compromised because students were only receiving money for expenses from and through the school instead of receiving money through boosters or alumni. The rules, guidelines, and aids can be set, but it is up to the institutions to comply by that principle. It is easy to break rules for the sake of competition when a team is desperate to turn a program around (Pierce & Clavio, 2008).

Salaries, wages, and compensations have always been major and generally controversial topics in democratic America. And, with the rising popularity of college athletics, particularly football, compensation (or lack thereof) for college athletes has recently been a hot topic in American sports. While some of the debate stems from the similarity between responsibilities college athletes have to their programs and those of professionals, most of the issue involves the principles of amateurism. Recent “scandals” involving college athletes such as Terrelle Pryor, Johnny Manziel, and Todd Gurley have raised questions about the ethics of amateurism, particularly with regard to the NCAA organization. The issue is found in a very gray area, where there is most likely no definitive one-size-fits-all solution, but the resolution of this issue is one that will change and shape the future of college athletics across the national landscape.

This normative approach are created by member representatives who serve on committee. They are the ones in charge to decide which rules to adopt from recruiting and compliance to academics and championships. How I stated before, one of the main NCAA’s issues is the money. The NCAA makes 1 billion of dollar during the month of March, but the players do not get paid at all. The internal stakeholders are the ones who defines ethical issues in business. The internal stakeholders like the member representatives create rules that are beneficial for most internal and external stakeholders. The problem appears when, the rules that are create are beneficial for most of the stakeholders, but the only ones who are not benefit from it, is the players. The players are the most relevant stakeholder, because they are the raw material. Without them, there is no business. The descriptive approach is strongly apply among the different levels of organization, but it still lacks when it comes about the players. According to Mark Emmert (President of NCAA) the athlete’s salaries is something that it would not even be debate about. The NCAA support their argument by saying the players are not employees they are students, so they do not have to be paid because they are already pay in the education and opportunities that are bring from playing at the NCAA league. From a legal point of view, what they NCAA does about

A few years ago, there was much discussion relating to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and those units responsible for instituting student-athlete and athletic department policy. This purpose of this paper is to discuss the ethical misconduct that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State and the University of Arkansas, and how the NCAA played a role in the wrongdoing. Coaches, players, and administrators face mounting pressures brought on by the need to sell seats and win games. In response, this type of pressure creates opportunities for offenses to take place. The first component of the paper will be to determine the fundamental ways in which the ethics programs of the NCAA failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Once those measures are identified and discussed, the ways the NCAA leadership contributed to the ethical violations of these schools will be discussed. The next element of the paper will predict the key differences in the scandals that occurred at each school if an effective ethics program was implemented. Next, the paper will suggest actions that the NCAA leadership should take to regain the trust and confidence of the students and stakeholders. The last section will identify measures that HR departments of