MH Course Analysis

This paper analyzes seven view points on the topic of Philosophy of Healthcare. The seven view points are blended into this paper by discussing what factors highly influenced my decision to choose healthcare as my set profession in life. Also discussing the Nature of Mankind, stating a few qualities that are highly important in our society and give examples of how it is used in our everyday life. This paper will further discuss the Brokenness of Mankind and what I believe are my most important qualities that I will be able to bring into the medical field. Discuss

A physician, just like the healers of the past, are concerned with promoting, maintaining or restoring human health through the treatment of disease, injury, and other physical and mental impairments. Similarities still exist in that the medical practice properly requires both a detailed knowledge of the academic science based disciplines underlying diseases and their treatment – the science of medicine – and also a decent competence in its applied practice – the art or craft of medicine.

In the essay Defending My Life, author Geov Parrish tells the narrative of his personal experience with the medical field and healthcare industry regarding life-saving organ transplants in which he underwent. Throughout his narrative he brings up many key issues present in current day medicine that relate well to our BEST medical curriculum. The first issue involves behaviorial aspects of medicine and the importance of the patient’s perspective in care. The next issue involves the social and ethical dilemmas relating to the cost of healthcare and adequate access to proper care.

2) Limits: The Role of Law in Bioethical Decisionmaking, by Roger B. Dworkin (Indiana, 1996) & Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed the Practice of Medicine, by David J. Rothman (Harper-Collins, 1991). [These are available for background material.--on reserve at the Law Library & the Center for Bioethics]

Prior to the late 1840’s, medicine was predominately practiced by males because women were not given the same opportunities and rights that men were born with. As a result they were forced to fight for admission into medical school to be given the freedom and choice to learn and collaborate with men. Their struggles didn’t cease once they were permitted to attend medical school; they were frequently ostracized and secluded from job opportunities in hospitals and clinics. Women were forced to put in double the amount of work, only to achieve half of the success of their male counterparts.

Hermann, Donald H.J. Lessons Taught by Miss Evers' Boys: The Inadequacy of Benevolence and the Need for Legal Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Research, 15 J.L. & Health 147 (2000-2001). Retrieved January 20, 2016, from http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1180&context=jlh

Within the last century, there have been many strides in terms of women’s rights- the right to vote, a place in the work force, the ability to have control over their bodies- but that has not always been the case. Throughout the numerous works we’ve read so far, one theme that stuck out to me more than once is the role that doctors and the medical field play in terms of female subordination. In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” and Maria Cristina Mena’s “The Vine Leaf,” doctors and medical practices have influence over the way we perceive a female’s place in society. The portrayal of these themes are slightly different between the two works, but both provide examples of women in places of inferiority. The doctors in

The evolution of women’s rights and advancements throughout history is undeniable. The prejudice against women in the workforce and more specifically in the medical workforce is a prejudice that can easily be found till this day. The idea of gender roles, and the separation of women and the “male dominated careers”, still lingers even through decades of change in a developing society. Fortunately, certain women in history have forever influenced the way medicine works as well as how women are looked upon when studying in the medical field. Although there were many male physicians far before the first woman could even be considered to attend a medical school, there were many women that wouldn’t take no for an answer. Whether it was through an

However, this was not Dr. Beermans last fight with sexism. During her emergency medicine rotation, her and other students were asked if they had ever done a central line procedure (Berman 2014, 395). To her astonishment most of the males raised their hands while none of the women did (Berman 2014, 395). Doctors were preferentially selecting males to teach and perform procedures because women were just there to watch (Berman 2014, 396). At the time when only twenty-five percent of her class was female, and no women had been taught a procedure that almost all the men had been was unfair. This extreme bias in medical education showed just how sexist medical schools were, and how unfair it was to its female students. The most egregious act of sexism was her experience with Georgetown’s apathy toward the female feminism group. These women were being subjected to hate mail, rape threats, and hostile phone calls (Berman 2014, 395). The Georgetown dean refused look for the perpetrator until the women got help from a women faculty member, and even then, all they did was install hidden cameras across from the school mailboxes (Berman 2014, 395). Not surprisingly the assailant was never caught (Berman 2014, 395). This incident of institutional-sexism sadly is not limited to Georgetown, but other medical schools suffer, as well as other social institutions.

The popular portrayal of American medicine greatly evolved over the course of the 20th century in many ways. In the beginning of the century, doctors were considered hero with magical powers to heal everyone through their knowledge. This can be shown in the "men in white" clip, where doctors are portrayed as the highest level and they take charge in the operating room. Also, only men were in the medical field because being a doctor showed more power and men were considered more powerful in that era (Not As A Stranger). As the years progressed, women joined the healthcare field as a nurse and more focus

In conclusion, Person introduces two conflicting opinions of the main message, medical ethics. However, there is a bias towards Jenna’s initial view, and the opinions of Lily and Alleys. Overall, the author uses this book as a way of showing us the ever-more relevant debate of medical ethics, but wants us to make our own decision of what view to

Since then, the development in the practice of medicine has changed through the passing of history, corresponding to the changes in society and culture. One can determine that the humanities provide significant involvement within the medical field. To support this statement, we can observe multiple cases within the field of ethics and singular perspectives within contexts of literature and history. We must also be able to observe how interdisciplinary methodology with various other disciplines also contribute to changing the field of medicine. An overall holistic approach is necessary in gauging the involvement of the humanities in medicine.

However, the framework has also provoked controversy and questions about its adequacy to resolve critical issues in bioethics and in clinical practice. In response, Beauchamp and Childress here offer an extended defense of their theory and critical examination of points of debate.

This awareness of the more interdisciplinary and reflexive attention to biotechnology and medicine has recently developed into creation of the medical humanities discipline as a training method. Here the aesthetical and ethical perspective is embedded into the medical practice and training. However, the existing policies focus on instrumental use of these tools ascribed to humanities. This means that rather than introducing new problems for analysis, they reinforce the old paradigms (Shapiro 2009) that not only treat technology in representative rather than generative manner but support also methodological division between emotions as belonging to the subject method of the humanities and rationally as objective method of science.

As per my writing sample on medicalization, I am greatly interested in the evolution of western medicine, how it came to its current pre-eminence, and women’s participation in the creation of the medical