preview

Macbeth Analytical Essay

Decent Essays

In an effort to achieve, it is often in literature that the protagonist learns to accept his or her currently fortuitous circumstances and rather than ambitiously seek what he or she wants, the protagonist acquires what they need. This is a way in which an author can teach a moral lesson about the ill fate of those bridled by ambition, hubris, greed, etc., without being overtly sententious. Shakespeare, whether by intention or coincidence, wrote in a similar sense in regards to some of his most famous and renowned tragedies. Often his works reflect a sense of morality, though rather than the protagonists realizing the mistakes, their flaws become fatal and only after their actions take their grievous course do they acknowledge their misjudgements. …show more content…

His inner turmoil as he struggles with his decision to commit regicide exemplifies this. He becomes a murderer and a treacherous, paranoid, and debaucherous tyrant. He allows his lust for power to overcome his sense of loyalty in addition to his sense of right and wrong. Shakespeare wrote a character with which the audience somewhat sympathizes with (that is until he commits unforgivable atrocities) and a character with a complex imbalance between rationality and vanity. What is interesting, however, is that all the trials and tragedies that befall Macbeth are of his own making; every decision he makes leads to an outcome that worsens his situation. Not one of the disadvantages he is faced with is an outside affliction. He is the cause of his own demise, whether by fate, free will, or simply a flawed destiny, he makes conscious decisions that lead to foreseeably wretched ends. His hypocrisy kills him and everything he loves. Hamlet, though, is slightly more complicated, but perhaps more …show more content…

Hamlet, one of Shakespeare’s most beloved protagonists, shares character traits with well crafted villains. Though he is supposed to be a tragic hero, he wittingly and cruelly hurts the people close to him in his despair and thirst for revenge. Towards the end of the play he claims he loved Ophelia more than her own brother did, a brother who did not play with her emotions and use her for his own gain and bloody goals. Even if Hamlet did truly love Ophelia, he manipulated and viciously abused her feelings, trust, and confidence, something one would find in a power-imbalanced relationship where one is a villain and the other a victim. His downfall, though, is his play at madness. He chooses to donne a facade of insanity in order to take revenge for his father’s sake, but meanwhile compromises his authority and ability to be taken seriously. Had he rather been subtle and not abrasively distance himself from every potential ally, perhaps he would not have met such a gruesome end. His own actions and selfish willingness to do anything to satisfy his own lust for revenge was the direct cause of his death. His brash murder of Polonius, his alienation of Ophelia, his disturbing confrontation and aggression towards his mother all lead to his death and the death of other innocent people. Again, Shakespeare has

Get Access