Macbeth Argument Essay Answers

Warrant - Reasoning that connects the evidence to claim. Helps show the relevance of the evidence.

2. Using the evidence you found during your reading, summarize the background of this case in three complete sentences.

Introduce the second main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.

an explanation of why and how each decision was made throughout the entire trial. The basis

“Are there rival causes?” (p. 128) This question helps evaluate an argument’s strength by examining any other reasonable causes

• 2) the narration would offer background material on the case at hand • 3) the partition would divide the case and make clear which part or parts the speaker was going to address, which parts the speaker would not take up and what order would be followed in the development • 4) the confirmation would offer points to substantiate the argument and provide reasons, details, illustrations, and examples in support • 5) the refutation would consider possible objections to the argument and try to counter these • 6) the peroration would draw together the entire argument and include material designed to compel the audience to think or act in a way related to the central argument

Just as generals must marshal or gather their troops, argumentative writers must marshal their evidence. Revisit your notes, graphic organizers, and worksheets from the play. Write key points of evidence in the chart below. Then, decide what claim you will make.

13. Which of the following is the best strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument? (Points : 5)

The purpose of this assignment is to make us capable to argue our claims with evidences. Moreover, it also learnt to be aware of the other side of the argument by writing the counter argument.

Paragraph 1: Must briefly explain the issue and state your position on it (do not present any reasons).

You will supplement the summary with an explanation of why you have included EACH fact by highlighting background facts in yellow and facts relevant to the legal issues in

Opposing points of view, or a counter argument should also be included. Include a response to an opposing point of view, then refute the opposing view’s position or show

Though some of the things that I did to help me make my drafts easier to complete, help like the ones above other did not. I tried doing a draft all at once without stopping and that did not help much. By the time I got to the end and I reread what I had written before I would forget the other details I had wanted to add. The other way I tried to make

Discredit the reliability of the con argument or demonstrate that it is in appositive or irrelevant to the topic by challenging its source, timeliness, authorship, or logic. For additional information, please review the Refutation Handout available under Course Documents.

Third but not least, the conclusion provides an almost mirror image of the introduction, wrapping up the arguments with a restatement of the thesis of your essay. I call this the bottom burger bun or in other words the conclusion. Holding it all together is the bottom bun of the hamburger or the conclusion to sum up all the key points of interest. The conclusion sentence should be interesting by giving it a call to action. As you can see a hamburger is easy to make like writing is not as hard as you think. Writing is very simple to do as preparing a hamburger.