preview

Machiavelli's Influence On Government

Good Essays

A man of such thought-provoking words, Niccolo Machiavelli, a Renaissance writer known by many titles such as modernist, realistic, and political theorist became famous for his ideology that changed people’s conceptions. The ideas he challenged were written through his many books and plays such as The Prince, The Mandrake, The Art of War, and The Discourse on Livy. Born in May 3rd, 1469, he was raised in Florence by an Italian family, and was educated in the classics and humanism. Though his early life is left relatively unknown, there is much knowledge about his involvement in the Florence government, as it kickstarts the beginning of his works. In 1498, he was appointed to become head of foreign policy for the Florence government. While …show more content…

Written in 1512 but published in 1532, The Prince was the first of Machiavelli’s political theories that made him known to the world. Machiavelli’s analysis of maintaining influence within a territory consisted of the mindset that citizens have of their leaders. The reason why rulers are changed frequently is by the demand of the people, and to do this, citizens usually try to overthrow. However, in the hope that a better ruler is appointed, usually the opposite happens in which the people were better off before they tried to change rulers. With this in mind, to prevent from being overthrown, the prince must obtain control over his people by making decisions that will cause them to become weaker (The Prince). As a ruler, making sure that one has a definitive sway over the people is essential to obtaining longevity, whereas if people had the ability to pursue whatever they wanted there would be no need for a ruler. Granted, the prince should be cautious of how far he goes to take away power from his people as it might lead them to become resentful. However, in the long run, by controlling the weak the prince will have an easier time maintaining his position(The Prince, Part I). In fact, this also creates a reputation within his state that he is not to messed with and should be respected. When respected, it will be …show more content…

Some subjects that were evaluated of the Romans were corrupt states, their people, and how lineages of princes successfully succeeded each other. Machiavelli believed that the good habits of people relied on the implemented laws and vice versa. Therefore, when people become increasingly fraudulent, the law would frequently change, thus proving that instituting a good foundation for a government early on would be beneficial to create good citizens. Moreover, the constitution could not be changed which can prevent remedies of corruption per example of the Romans. In Rome, citizens were appointed and accepted the honor of being in office; however, the influential stepped into power once corruption settled in causing the weak to abstain from office due to fear. Due to the self appointed dominant group ruling over Rome, the previous system of democracy was destroyed, and was replaced by new laws that only benefited their needs. Had Rome changed their constitution, the corruption could have been prevented; however, despite that, it provided an example for which the future could take note of. In a time of fraudulency when the need for change is evident, people will become desperate, and they will go to any extreme to get their ways. For

Get Access