Macomb County Circuit Court Case Study: Yankitis V.

BEING the same premises conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed of Mo Wells, et al., dated May 3, 1964, and recorded in the Lackawanna County Recorder of Deeds in Deed Book 810 Page 233.

BEING the same premises conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed of Mo Wells, et al., dated May 3, 1964, and recorded in the Lackawanna County Recorder of Deeds in Deed Book 810 Page 233.

Do the terms of the easement require Mr Hogg to allow you to continue to be able to use the inclinator?

This report analyses the altercation between Norvik Industry 's ( a building company), Water Corporation and Adrian and Linda Webb who are owners of a block of land on Flagstaff Crescent in Secret Harbour

The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, and the decision is described as follows:

 In February 1998, Pfizer Inc., announced it would construct a worldwide headquarter on the land in Fort Trumbull. More specifically, on the petitioner’s properties. Two months later, the government of Fort Trumbull accepted Pfizter’s job on their property without consulting the property owners knowing. This new building would total a redevelopment of 90 acres of Fort Trumbull in order to “complement the facility that Pfizer was planning to build, create jobs, increase tax and other revenues, encourage public access to and use of the city’s waterfront, and eventually ‘build momentum’ for the revitalization of the rest of the city.” The specific property affecting the private owner’s would serve as a parking lot for this headquarters. So, these nine properties, with sentimental values would be used as a open parking lot, in use for the sole purpose of parking other people’s cars.

A small parcel of land, part of the original property belonging to the Yountville Veterans’ Home, remained on the east side of State Road 29. The Veteran’s Home expressed an interest in providing the deed to this parcel of land to the Town of Yountville as long as the land was for use by the community and not sold for profit. The Town desired to create a park that was welcoming and connected the entrances to the Town of Yountville and the Veterans’ Home because they were

The major concern is a discrepancy with what was showing on the recorded final subdivision plat versus what was actually done. The discrepancy is a lot depicted on the approved plat as “Parcel A” that is actually stubbed out for a roadway. Upon discovery by myself, and the two (2) Planning Inspectors (Donald Rixner, Jr. and George Tassin), I questioned the real estate developer by the name of Joseph M. Scontrino, III. In questioning him, I asked, if there was a modification to the recorded subdivision plat, his answer was “no”, so I then present him with a copy of the recorded plat that shows “Parcel A” as a lot and not for the intent to continue Summerlin Drive. Once I returned to the office, Angelic Sutherland was told about the discrepancy, her response was we were only to review the proposed Phase 3, Section 1 of Summerlin Lake Subdivision, not areas that have received approval. At this time, I explained to Angelic that whenever staff finds discrepancies out in the field, it is our duty to right the wrong. Even after providing this concern, it was dismissed and I was told that “Joey” is allowed to do as he please despite the laws. This instance contradicts the recorded plat and the definition of lot, which reads, “Lot means a parcel of land or any combination of several lots of record, occupied or intended to be

Case Briefing #2 Vizcaino v. US Dist. Court for WD of Wash., 173 F. 3d 713 (9th Cir.1999)

It is so moved, in consideration for an amended easement agreement to allow Colonial Square to continue historical operations on the easement of Ann Arbor Housing Commission, Colonial Square will enter into an License Agreement to perform limited grounds maintenance and landscaping on the Ann Arbor Housing Commision

At the point when Siametis executed the offer on November 22, 1977, he additionally marked a waiver of consistence with s. 44(1) and (2) of the Land and Business Specialists Act, R.S.O. 1970, c. 401, in spite of the fact that the frame that he executed alluded to "provisions "an" and "b" of subsection 1 of segment 44 of The Land and Business Specialists Act, R.S.O. 1960, c.

IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS and agreements contained in this Sales Agreement the parties to this Agreement agree as follows:

* There has been continued redevelopment. In 2006 there was a 3.4 million redevelopment package which again developed the docks.

This Settlement and Release Agreement is made and entered into by and between YVONNE A. WOODY (Formerly YVONNE A. ZANDERS) and ROLAND WOODY, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF R.Z., on the one hand, and the STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and ROBEL KINFE, on the other hand.

The CCC held a public hearing which led to further factual findings which reaffirmed the need for the condition. The CCC’s argument was that the building of the new structure would limit view of the ocean, and therefore limit access to the public who had full rights to use the beach. To compensate for the limitations on the public the Nollans would have to provide access to the beach from their property. The CCC also noted that all of the other developments on the same tract of land had been conditioned similarly in having to provide public access to the ocean.