What is MacQueen’s cabin number? MacQueen’s cabin number is No.6. From which country does Greta Ohlsson Greta Ohlsson comes from Sweden. come from? By what does the evidence of the passengers The evidence of the passengers is supported is supported? by the statement of the conductor that no one entered or left Mr Ratchett’s compartment from midnight to 1 o’clock. What is Poirot’s list’s last question? The list’s last question is “What other explanation of his wounds can there be?”. What is the first thing M. Bouc said to The first thing M. Bouc said to Poirot on the Poirot on the train? train is “It is wonderful that we are surrounded by people of all classes, of all ages and of all nationalities. …show more content…
Linda Arden’s daughter’s godmother is Who married Linda Arden? Count Andrenyi married Linda Arden. Who is Mrs. Armstrong’s youngest sister? Mrs. Armstrong’s youngest sister is Helena Goldenberg. According to Helena, who was Daisy’s nurse? According to Helena, Daisy’s nurse was Susanne Stengelberg. Which letter does “H” represent in Russian? In Russian, “H” represents the letter “N”. According to Hercule Poirot, what is Mrs. According to Hercule Poirot, Mrs. Debenham’s Debenham’s main characteristic? main characteristic is her suspicious character. What was Mrs. Debenham’s job before Daisy Mrs. Debenham was working as a governess was killed? for the armstrong family before Daisy died. What does Hercule Poirot like to see from Hercule Poirot likes to see an angry time to time? Englishman. What was Antonio Foscarelli’s job? Antonio Foscarelli was working as a chauffeur for the Armstrong family. What was Greta Ohlsson’s real job? Greta Ohlsson was working for the Armstrong family as Daisy’s nurse. Where did everyone gather after Poirot’s After Poirot’s investigation, everyone investigation? gathered in the dining
By placing examples of other authors, it provided a better understanding of how favoured Agatha was as a writer. As the introduction concluded, I found the thesis statement very concise as it showed the authors opinion towards Agatha and contained three elements which informed the reader what they would be experiencing throughout the essay. Through analysing the essay, I found that it took a rational approach to the flow of ideas. Each paragraph that was written was addressed with a compelling topic sentence that began with a general topic, which later lead into the main idea. An example is shown in the first body paragraph when the author states, “Next to Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot and Miss Jane Marple are two if the most recognizable detectives in fiction because of their distinctive attributes.” Structurally, the author incorporated a short sentence within each paragraph that acted as a transition from one part of an argument to another. This was a great aspect I found regularly throughout their writing. When examining the conclusion the author began with a specific topic that gradually grew into a more generalized idea. They easily outlined supportive points that were given throughout the essay rather than restating their
Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie is a murder-mystery novel that takes place on a train headed toward Calais. In the middle of the 2nd night aboard, the train comes to a halt, and the passengers are stuck in a snowstorm. It is then discovered that a man has been murdered, and everyone in the train is now a suspect. The novel follows Hercule Poirot as he examines the evidence and tries to piece together the story behind the murder. Throughout the novel, the theme of justice is very important because it is repeatedly mentioned, it was initially evaded by the victim, and is revealed to be the inspiration behind the murder.
Miss Seeton find herself embroiled in a police investigation as they investigate a spate of robberies. The chief suspects in the series are the Sherry Gang, who have been pretending to help old people with their shopping before drugging them with spiked sherry. While their victim is out cold, they rob them of anything valuable and make off to rob another victim. Another group has been involved in another type of robbery. The Turpins have revived highway robbery and target coaches full of the elderly that they hold up before robbing passengers of their valuables. Plummergen is the same old village thriving on gossip while the police depend on Miss Seeton to point them in the right direction. The novel is a light mystery read set in a quaint setting that would be an awesome read for the detective thriller or cozy mystery
The main point of this article is that this story has most classic Christie themes including an enclosed setting (oriented express) and loose associates among suspects. In a detective novel, the suspects usually is much closer to the dead person. But in Murder On The Orient Express, the readers are aware that one after another passengers is connected with the Armstrong kidnapping case. In the end it turns out that everyone has something to hide; however, the criminals are let off scot-free because they have got rid of the world of a monster that law cannot reach,
They brought her down to the station to be questioned. There were two people in this tight, dark, eerie room. The police and Miss strangeworth stared intensely at each other for what felt like hours. It was silence but you could hear Miss Strangeworth crying of fear. The officer began to ask simple questions. He started with the ‘who’ of this investigation. “I am the only one writing these letters” she confesses “But I have a letter on almost everyone in this small town.” The officer asks for how long she has been writing these letters
4) I am SO mad at this book! Everything that can go wrong goes wrong! Oliver leaves Mr. Brownlow’s? Let’s have him kidnapped! Mr. Bumble in London? Well, he’s gonna give Mr. Brownlow an awful version of Oliver’s life! Oliver assigned to help with a burglary? They’re gonna get caught and Oliver shot! Don’t you just LOVE serial writing? Destroying the protagonist's life so it can get sewn back together is SO FUN! I’m being sarcastic if it isn’t obvious.
Had he ever committed a crime? 6. Who is Mildred?a. She is Clarisse's mother.b. She is Montag's wife.c. She is a doctor at Emergency Hospital.d. She is a writer who has gone underground. 7. What happened to her?a. She was captured and sent to a prison camp.b. She contracted a fatal, contagious disease and had to be quarantined.c. She took an overdose of sleeping pills and had to have her stomach and blood pumped clean.d. She had just been promoted to a position of power in the government. 8. Why did Emergency Hospital send technicians instead of a doctor to treat the patient?a. The patient didn't have enough insurance coverage to merit a doctor's care.b. Doctors only treated men.c. There weren't enough doctors, so none ever left the hospital.d. That kind of medical procedure was so common that technician-operated machines had been developed to treat the patient. 9. What were parlor walls?a. They were a kind of surround television with which the audience could interact.b. They were portable partitions that could be repositioned to create a variety of living spaces.c. They were hidden microphones that could monitor conversations.d. They were barricades that separated one neighborhood from
8. The conversation between Millie and her friends show how their society is selfish, they complain about children and aren’t fazed by the fact that men are dying in a war. I think that this can at times be an accurate description of our society today because we only give our thanks to our soldiers on Veteran’s Day. Faber is angry with Montag because he is giving away too much information to these women who don’t even care. I don’t think this was a wise decision for him to make because one of these women could report Montag and this could have dire consequences for
The letter which Johannes received from Karolina had been written shortly after their arrival in Cincinnati, Ohio where they were staying with her cousin’s family. They had met him, his wife and son at the wharf when their ship docked in New York City from Antwerp. The family had been excited to see familiar faces in the crowds waiting for the ship. After meeting with the New York City authorities and receiving permission to leave their ship, the family encountered several adventures in New York City even meeting several former countrymen from Baden and other New York City’s prominent citizens.
Murder on the Orient Express is more than just a murder mystery. It is a novel that utilizes a great deal of existing social issues of the era in which it was written and formed a commentary on those issues while giving the reader an intriguing yet approachable narrative. Through this approach, Agatha Christie has given the reader an opportunity to see the world through the eyes of the seasoned private investigator Hercule Poirot. In this world, nothing is at it seems and apparent coincidence belies a hidden truth, a world in which the geographical connections created by passenger railways allowed people of different nationalities and classes to rub elbows.
Due to Holmes’ suspicion he and Watson desired to investigate further; they departed to Stoke Moran. They revealed some interesting clues. First of all, the bed was clamped to the floor, there were metallic bars on the windows, along with a forged bell chord attached to a ventilator. Holmes soon found out that the ventilator was connected to Dr. Roylott 's room. This made Sherlock curious, wanting to know more. Helen was a young woman who was frightened of the strong and abusive, Dr. Roylott. She had prearranged to switch places with Sherlock and Watson so they could resolve the case once and for all. She exchanged places after Dr. Roylott was “asleep”. When Sherlock and Holmes arrived to Stoke Moran, they waited and waited. During the middle of the story, both the mood and tone shift. The mood soon became petrified. The tone soon also became something else, challenging. Sherlock Holmes and
For example, the murderers begin warning Ratchett of his approaching death with ominous letters. The group constantly sends threatening letters, and notes about the Armstrong case to Ratchett that eventually starts to make him seem paranoid and crazy. People around him just believe he is losing his mind, so they ignore him until he is actually dead. Furthermore, the assassins attempt to mislead the detectives when they purposely leave belongings of the murderer in Ratchett’s room to make it seem as though they are trying to incriminate that person. Colonel Arbuthnot is the only person on the train who admits to smoking using a pipe, so the pipe cleaner found in Ratchett’s room makes it seem as though someone is trying to frame him. This makes the detectives feel as though Colonel is innocent, which is another example of the processed thinking the murderers do. Finally, Ratchett is stabbed twelve time, which is both a metaphor, and part of the revenge. The group feels as though proper justice is not served in the Armstrong, so they stab Ratchett twelve time-- symbolizing twelve jury members, as well as a stab for each other as revenge. Poirot realizes the connection when he says, "And then, Messieurs, I saw light. They were all in it. . . . A jury is composed of twelve people-- there were twelve passengers-- Ratchett was stabbed twelve times" (306). The metaphor and emotion behind the stabbing makes it clear that the murder of Ratchett is an act of pure vengeance. In conclusion, the most meticulous manner the murder is conducted is the manner in which the murder is
Not only do they lie to the other passengers of the train and the reader, but also to the great detective Herlcule Poirot. “Lies- and again lies. It amazes me, the amount of lies we had told to us this morning… There are still more to discover.” (Christie MOE 61). The ego of the passengers and isolation are in sync to the theory as they are all in small space with so much hatred towards the man that it drives them enough to kill him. Being so tight in a small compartment leads them to all kill Ratchtte for what he did to the little girl of Daisy Armstrong together and knew what they were doing. The passengers have it set in their mind that they want to kill him in which they do but never speak a word of it to Poirot. “If ever a man deserves what he got, Ratchett... Is the man... I'm Rejoice I was end. Such a man wasn't fit to live!” (2.13). In closing, both novels show the ego/illness by all the guests on the island and train committing a murder, lie about themselves, and hold inner disires that only the reader learns to find out.
Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie gives the reader a lot of information and reasonable suspicion for each person on the train, however, she does not definitively single out one person who is responsible for the crime within the first two parts of the story. Once Ratchett, the victim, is murdered, Bouc appoints Poirot to be the detective of the case. In part two of Murder on the Orient Express, Poirot organizes a makeshift courtroom in the dining car where he can interview each of the passengers. After the interviews, everyone has their own alibi but each person also has some sort of suspicion surrounding them. The person I think is responsible for the murder of Ratchet on the Orient Express is Miss Mary Debenham. From the very first chapter, Ms. Debenham is extremely suspicious. Before the book takes place on the Orient Express, the setting in the first few pages is on the Taurus Express in which Poirot, Miss. Debenham, and Colonel Arbuthnot are aboard. Poirot, as he often does, likes to study people to pass the time and this time was no different. He describes Ms. Debenham as a type of women who could take care of herself and one who is cool, calm, and collected. During this first chapter, the train stops for a while after it arrives in Konya. Colonel Arbuthnot and Miss Debenham go out to stretch when Poirot overhears something Ms. Debenham told the Colonel. “Not now. Not now, When it’s behind us - then -” (Christie 11). This is extremely concerning given
The relationship between the two of them is of utmost importance to the solving of the case as they are the ones who are involved in the solving of the case. For example, without M.Bouc’s intervention using his influence, the case may not have been solved as M.Poirot would not have gotten on the train itself. Moreover, their relationship adds a different dimension to the story and this shows the writer’s skilfulness in making the story interesting and fun to read.