Major Issues in the High Court Review 2006

931 WordsFeb 4, 20184 Pages
The major issues in the high court review 2006: Australian Federalism – implications of the work choices decision is that it seems unlikely that voters would have supported the characterisation of the corporation power that was adopted by the court. This might be viewed as a problem. This is argued that the majority’s disregard of failed referendums constitutes usurpation of the people’s privilege to change constitution as certain. Callinan J stated that the view of the people was appropriate arbiters on the vital constitutional changes. The people had the majority for their lack of faith in the intelligence and common sense of voters. Michael Coper (1994) had suggested that the referendum proposal may fail for a few complex reasons. The failure may not guide to the decades later as a similar matter appears before the high court for its settlement. The federal government will need to use legislative authority in the policies available to them. In order to do this it will be heavy in some areas, such as public hospitals this could mean a poisoned chalice. Democracy always has political participation; this means it involves, electing and rejecting leaders, influencing important decisions by voting, continuous influence on the decision – making process, direct participation in decision making and accountability of government to the citizens is a key notion. There are three notions in democracy and they are; direct, classical and participatory/deliberative. Direct democracy

More about Major Issues in the High Court Review 2006

Open Document