preview

Malfroid And Aidman Essay

Decent Essays
Open Document

Malfroid and Aidman both comment on the ending of the film, and discuss the different ways it could be viewed. From a feminist perspective, Malfroid points out “Pocahontas does not depend on a marriage for her happiness - because she rejects both Kocuom and John Smith”. She chooses a path other than romantic fulfilment. This would further illustrate the fact that she is less dependent on men than other Disney princesses. However, Aidman believes that Pocahontas’ decision not to go with John Smith is actually anti-feminist. She claims that “it can only be viewed … as a subtext that a strong woman cannot have it all,” that Pocahontas is punished for being a strong female character and therefore is denied her happily ever after with her Prince …show more content…

Aidman suggests that Pocahontas is an example of a film which portrays Native Americans as the stereotype of the ‘noble savage’. She quotes Stuart Hall to explain what this is, as he defines it as “the good side of the ‘native’” which is “portrayed in a certain primitive nobility and simple dignity” which is produced out of white ambivalence (Stuart Hall cited in Aidman). This may be an improvement from the depiction of Native Indians as ‘savages’ who shoot at the hero in western films. However, it is still a harmful stereotype as it creates a sense of othering and sets Native Americans apart as something exotic and different to Euro-Americans. Native Americans then tend to be represented in an almost two dimensional idea of what Euro-Americans think they should be like.
During the production of Pocahontas, several Native American historical advisors were brought in, including Shirley Custalow-McGowan. She, like Pocahontas was from the Powhatan Nation. However, McGowan became disheartened when she realised that Disney was not giving much thought to historical accuracy, and said that she wished her name was never associated with the

Get Access