Through virtual and actual dissection, a lot was learned about amphibian, the frog, and mammalian, the rat. It was noted that the frog and rat had similarities and differences in the external and internal structure. It was then inferred, by the observations made, that the amphibian and mammalian have some similar and different evolutionary descent and habitat. And lastly, through the dissections and research, the organism's population trends and ecological issues was learned. The dissection proved a lot of information about the two types of organisms. It was noted that the frog and the rat had many different external structures. The amphibian had a nicotine membrane over its eye to protect the eyeball while under water. The amphibian also had a tympanic membrane, while the frog had ears. The skin of the organisms was observed: the frog had a smooth, slimy skin for swimming, while the rat had fur to keep it warm. The muscular system of the both seemed …show more content…
The population of the frogs tend to remain the same or decrease a little, while the rats either stay the same or increase. Both of the species suffer from humans building and polluting. The frogs are getting pushed out as ponds are drained for housing, toxins are flowing into the pond from factories, and even soda cans and plastic killing them. Rats also suffer from fields being turned into housing and pollution. They both also suffer from their own natural predators. The virtual and actual dissections were education. The amphibians and mammalians were compared and contrasted on internal and external anatomy, evolutionary descent, and population trends and ecological issues. A lot was learned going through the packets and performing the dissections. The inference was made that the frog and rat have a common ancestor, but the frog stuck to that water and the rat went to
Chapter One details the ancestry of frogs and examines the timeline of amphibians on Earth, as well as the increase in frog extinction rate. Kolbert argues that the observed extinction rates which are exceeding expected background extinction rates suggest that catastrophe is ahead for Earth. Humans are key to the extinction of Panamanian frogs due to their spreading of the Chtrid fungus, which is not native to Panama. Thus, Kolbert sees humans
The whistling tree frog does not have as many infected or dead frogs as scientists expected. Researchers theorized that the frog has evolved slightly or those who were infected as juveniles survived and became immune. Their habitat is also play a role in their
The dissection of fetal pigs in the laboratory is extremely important as pigs are complex organisms with an internal structure much similar to the human body. This provides students to with the opportunity to receive insight on how their bodies work. In addition, they will also be given the opportunity to learn about evolution through the dissection of a pig.
The author and his colleagues chose to focus on 375 million year old rocks in their search for fossils because amphibians that look dissimilar to fish were discovered in 365 million year old rocks, while fish without amphibian characteristics were discovered in 385 million year old rocks. Thus, it is possible that the evolutionary intermediary, or the “missing link” between fish and amphibians, would be discovered in 375 million year old rocks, between the two time periods. The rocks examined were sedimentary in composition, as the gradual and relatively gentle formation of sedimentary rock under conditions of mild pressure and low heat are conducive to the fossilization of animal remains. Sedimentary rock is also often formed in rivers and seas, where animals are likely to live. This site provides a resource that describes means by which fossils are formed and how the fossil record may be interpreted, and shows some examples of fossils demonstrating evolution through geological periods: http://www.fossilmuseum.net/fossilrecord.htm. In 2004, Shubin and his colleagues were looking for fossils on Ellesmere Island, in northern Canada. This location was chosen because of its lack of human development, as well as of obstructing natural formations and life forms such as trees, which
Sus scrofa, or the domestic pig is a member of the class Mammalia and the order Artiodactyla. Since we as humans are also a member of class Mammalia, we have a good deal in common biologically with pigs, although we might not like to think so. Since we have a good deal in common, it is very helpful for us to study these animals both anatomically and physiologically. We do this when we test medicines on pigs, perfect surgical procedures on pigs, and even when we used to use pig valves for replacements in human hearts. Thus the pig is a first-rate example of a mammal and the purpose of this lab is to recognize the specific similarities between the pig and ourselves as humans. To accomplish this we
Here are a few examples of how they are both different, for instance, the frog's habitat is wet, green, is on the ground or in water. The frogs eat flies and other insects and
Perhaps the most striking evidence is the patterns in the cladograms of the organisms. If the first claim were true, both the origin and the type of lizard would be grouped together on the
In this experiment we dissected a frog. A frog is a tailless amphibian with short squat body. It has moist skin, and very long hind legs for leaping. Frogs are a diverse and largely carnivous. Its scientific name is Anura has a life span of 10 to 12 years. The frog habitat is in or near ponds. The eggs hatch out into tiny tadpoles which cling to the pond weed feather- like external gills on the side of the head. They eat the algae in the pond and other vegetable matter.
Animal models are frequently used to learn about various physiological processes. While many animals can be used, a murine model is often utilized. A question that arises in regards to these animals is whether or not they are appropriate to use in order to learn about human processes.
Frog populations decreasing is a response of increasing levels of habitat loss, the conditions the frog population is put under is unfavorable because the frogs have semi permeable skin which allows pollutants go be absorbed by the body. Their natural habitats are quickly shrinking and pollutants from populated areas are seeping into what’s left of them. Scientists believe the leading factor of this population decrease is due to habitat loss to humans, as we expand our horizons so quickly, many ecosystems and populations are destroyed. As stated in the article, “some regions of the United States retain less than 20% of the wetland acreage they once had” (Volume 50). The importance of this quote is that it states the problem, less than 20% of their habitat still exists. This means there will be a struggle for resources amongst them and numbers will be forced to decline. As wetlands are drained, and rivers and streams are dammed up habitats change forcing the frogs to change as well. If the frogs can’t adapt to their habitat quickly they will die.
Compare and /or contrast the anatomy of the White Rat with that one of the Human body.
Dr. Balanoff and Shuo Wang, using fossils and a big comparative analysis of the animals of today, found the relationship
The frenzy over deformed frogs began on a lazy summer day in August 1995. Cindy Reinitz, a teacher at a school in Henderson, Minnesota, was walking with her middle school students down a deserted, dusty back road on the way to a field trip at a local farm. Along the way, the kids began to chase frogs along the side of the road. When one of the kids showed her a frog with a missing leg, her first instinct was that one of her less than angelic students had pulled the leg off. However, a closer examination of the frog showed no fresh wound, and when she and her middle schoolers set out to capture more frogs, they noticed that a large number of the frogs were missing legs, had more than two legs, or were deformed in some other way (Souder, 1).
In this study of different body structures of different species in manner that will help us to understand and get to know how they are adapted to different tasks and to learn the adapted changes that have occurred throughout their life dating from their ancestry to date. Charles Darwin is a great scientist in this history of evolution in terms of studying the comparative anatomy and he has
Frogs, toads, caecilians, and salamanders are the members of the class Amphibian (amphi- meaning “on both sides” and bios- meaning “life”). These members always require water for reproduction. Most Amphibians undergo metamorphosis, which is a usually degenerative pathological change in the structure of a particular body tissue. And, in the case of Amphibians, it is the changing of a tadpole into